Criminal Flashcards
Discuss classic study
Loftus and Palmer
45 into 5 groups.
Shown seven clips and all same besides critical question
41-32 difference due to verb
Second study was broken glass
Smashed hit and control 16 7 6
Discuss amygdala
Associated with emotions and if removed or ablated react excessively or not at all
Sham rage by cannon and Britton
More empathy related neurocircuitry in females
Narabahayi severed amygdala and mood balanced in criminals
Discuss brain injury
Interferes with absorption of b1 thiamine and become aggressive.
Elbogen states issue with brain of those after war
Kreuker found ineffective as 20% pre and 10% post injury out of 74 criminals so cannot be stated unless substance abuse implicated
Discuss xyy
Super male syndrome
Theilgaard found small prevalence and hence cannot be generalised
Also cannot be used for women
Discuss personality
Eysenck PEN
Testosterone levels
High activation and low threshold
High cortisol arousal via the ARAS
Rushton and Chrisjohn found high PE in delinquent behaviour but not n
Discuss SLT
4 stages attention retention reproduction and motivation
Williams supported with tv and aggression for 16 people
Cornstock and paik 0.19 meta analysis for tv and aggression
But used on kid samples reductionist and deterministic
Discuss SFP
Issue with labelling and internalising these labels and acting affording to them
Pygmalion effect with rosenthal and Jacobson proving with kids and the bloom idea
Jahoda with 22% and 7% and cultural expectations
Unethical and reductionist
Discuss contemporary study
Valentine and mesout 56 people Mean anxiety score was 49 No Difference in trait 75% compared to 71% Higher confidence in those who guessed right suspect
Discuss cognitive interview
Based on two principles of association and reinstating context
4 methods to it: reinstate context, free recall, other perspective and change order
Geiselman looked into it and found 29.56 to 39.46 difference and reinforced by Fisher with 47% accuracy and holliday with young and old
Discuss character as an influence for jury making a decision
Race- Bradbury and Williams with black and Hispanic jury being most guilty but, skolnic and shaw stated we do not find black defendant guilty due to issue with being stated as racist
Attractivess Saladin 8people and the most attractive less likely to commit crime
Accent - Dixon and Mahoney with transcript of non brummie person- stated brummie and black brummie most likely to be guilty. Consistent in 2002/2004 too
Discuss publicity as a Factor affecting jury decision making
Pre
Steblay did meta analysis of 44 studies found more likely to be guiltily if shown negative media
Ogloff- tv more effect than news due to 24/7 access,
During
Defendant characteristics
Expert witness testimony
Story models as proven by Pennington and hastie with 75% guilty if easy to follow and only 31% if hard to follow
Post
Normative or informational conformity
Minority influence shown by moscovsi
Foreperson influence
Evaluate this
Good control and meta analysis are objective and valid as already proven and analysed
But mock jurors and mainly students so limite validity
2 other ways to understand the individual
Ethics and psychological formulations
Discuss anger management as a treatment
3 stages cog prep, skills acquisition, application of practise
Ireland- 92% improvement in 50
And mcdougall with 18 offenders
Focuses on triggers
Watt et al- no difference in Western Australia
Expensive and may lie for early release
Studies not long enough to look into recidivism
Hormones and drugs as a treatment
Dopamine
Le blanc with 163 boys and conduct disorder minus 56.4 in aggression
Serotonin
Coccaro and kavoussi outpatients and found when scale used and fluoxetine that after 2 months less irritable and 3 months no aggression
Testosterone
MPa administered and 8 men lowered by loosen
Consistent results and placebo used, so allows valid findings but side effects can take 4 weeks for ssris to work and maletzy 41% didn’t receive due to shortage