Criminal 1: Bringing Proceedings and Burden of Proof Flashcards

1
Q

At which court are different criminal cases filled against?

A

ALWAYS Magistrates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who can bing a criminal case to court?

A

Generally CPS on behalf of the crown (Regina)

Also can be brought by
- local authorities (county council and cities)
- Government agencies if permitted by parliament including:
- Environmental Agency
- private citizens
- organisations
- charities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the aim in bringing criminal case?

A
  • compensate for criminal acts
  • punish (prison, fine etc.)
  • incapacitation (imprisonment, curfew)
  • deterrence
  • rehabilitation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who has the burden of proof and what is the standard?

A
  1. Prosecution
    - beyond a reasonable doubt
  2. Sometimes defendant for:
    - certain defences (on balance of probabilities)
    - certain excuses (balance of probabilities)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the evidential burden of the defence of self-defence?

A

Once raised by defendant
- prosecution must disprove it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What elements may make up the AR?

A
  1. Conduct
    - generally positive action
    - omission only if breached a duty owed to defendant
  2. Circumstance
    - that must exist for a offence (eg. stolen property must belong to another)
  3. Results Crimes
    - must satisfy causation test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How is causation for results crime tested?

A
  1. Factual Causation
    - but for test
    - if more than one cause or if actions accelerated result that is sufficient
    - eg. poisoning ill person so they die sooner // two people poison same food independently of each other both liable
  2. Legal Causation
    - Action must be substantial cause (more than minimal, slight or trifling); and
    - Action must be operative (no intervening act)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What intervening acts are there for results crimes?

A
  1. Medical Negligence
    - Only if negligent treatment was so independent of D’s act and so potent in causing death, that they regard the contribution made by D as insignificant
  2. Act of 3rd party
    - 3rd party has to act freely, deliberately and informed
  3. Acts of Victim
    - if voluntary and not foreseeable by defendant or reasonable person
    - must be so daft as to be unforeseeable
    - think skull rule applies
  4. Acts of Defendant
    - yes if new act
    - stab someone and then infect them they only die of infection - this breaks chain of causation
  5. Natural Event
    - if unforeseeable by defendant and reasonable person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Mens Rea?

A
  • state of mind D must have during the event
  • NOT motive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Different types of intent

A

Direct Intent
- D’s aim or purpose

Oblique Intent
- result was virtual certainty; and
- realised by defendant as such
- only available for specific intent offences

Specific Intent
- some crimes requires only specific intent (can only commit intentionally)
- can use oblique intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

List of Specific intent offences

A
  • attempt
  • encouragement and assistance
  • murder
  • wounding or causing GBH with intent (s.18)
  • Theft
  • Robbery
  • Burglary (under s. 91a)
  • fraud by false misrepresentation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is transfer malice

A
  • Applies to intention
  • If defendant has intention to commit an offence against one victim but inadvertently commits the offence against a different victim mens rea is satisfied
  • Only applies to same offence (ie throwing brick with intention of hitting someone (assault) but hits window (criminal damages) then transfer malice will not apply)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are strict liability offences?

A
  • Can be found guilty from the mere fact that they committed the act
  • No Mens Rea is required
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how to show MR for Corporate Liability

A

Identification Doctrine
- To show MR for crime committed by corporation must find a controlling mind (a person whose actions and mental stae can be said to be that of the corporation as a whole)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly