Crim 131 final Flashcards
El Salvador’s War on Gangs vid
- What was the primary reason for El Salvador’s government constructing the mega-prison for gang members?
The government built the mega-prison to control the growing gang violence and to isolate dangerous gang members from the public.
- How does the prison design reflect the government’s approach to handling gang violence?
The prison is designed to keep gang members separated and under strict surveillance, showing that the government is taking a strong approach to stop gang activity and prevent violence.
- What are some of the human rights concerns raised about the conditions inside the prison?
Concerns include overcrowding, poor living conditions, and the lack of basic human rights, such as adequate food, healthcare, and access to legal support.
How has the public in El Salvador reacted to the government’s approach to tackling gang violence?
Many people support the government’s hardline approach, seeing it as necessary to combat the gang violence, while others are worried about the impact on human rights and the fairness of the system.
- What are the potential long-term implications (outcomes) of El Salvador’s approach to gang violence for its justice system and society?
Long-term effects may include more pressure on the justice system, more human rights abuses, and the risk of gang members becoming more extreme. This approach could also cause greater social divisions and unrest. (Society might become more divided, with more protests or conflicts.)
Questions Based on Foucault’s Panopticon: The Inspiration for George Orwell’s 1984 video
(concept inspired by the architectural design of a prison created)
1. What is the central concept of the Panopticon, and how does it function as a system of control?
The Panopticon is a prison design where a single guard can observe all prisoners without them knowing when they are being watched. It works as a system of control because prisoners behave better if they believe they are always under surveillance.
- How does Foucault use the Panopticon as a metaphor for modern society?
Foucault uses the Panopticon to show how modern society controls people. He argues that, like prisoners in the Panopticon, people in society feel watched and self-regulate their behavior even without direct observation.
- What parallels (similar) can be drawn between Foucault’s Panopticon and Orwell’s depiction of Big Brother in 1984?
Both the Panopticon and Big Brother represent constant surveillance to control individuals. In both systems, people modify their behavior because they fear being watched, even though they might not always know when or how.
- Why does Foucault consider the Panopticon a more effective form of power than physical punishment?
Foucault sees the Panopticon as more effective because it encourages self-discipline. Instead of using force, it makes people control their actions because they are unsure when they are being watched, leading to a more constant form of power.
- In what ways does the Panopticon influence social structures beyond the prison system?
The Panopticon influences areas like schools, workplaces, and surveillance systems, where people are constantly monitored or feel watched, leading them to behave in ways that align with societal expectations.
- How does the concept of self-surveillance connect to modern technologies?
Self-surveillance is connected to modern technologies like smartphones, social media, and cameras, where individuals often track their own behavior or feel watched by others, encouraging conformity and self-regulation.
Question Based on Norwegian Prisons video
What is the central philosophy of punishment used in Norway, and how does it reflect their approach to rehabilitation?
Norway’s central philosophy of punishment focuses on rehabilitation rather than retribution. They try to help offenders return to society by providing education, job training, and therapy. They believe treating prisoners kindly lowers the chance they will commit crimes again.
Questions Based on An Eye for an Eye (CNN) Video
- Describe the key events involving the main character in this video.
“The main character is a victim of a violent crime who seeks justice through the legal system. The video highlights their physical and emotional struggles after the attack, their experiences in court facing the offender, and their thoughts on the concept of ‘an eye for an eye’ as a form of justice. It explores their journey from pain to seeking closure or retribution.”
- What kind of punishment did the victim request from the court, and how is this type of punishment classified?
The victim requested a form of punishment that involved revenge or retribution. This type of punishment is classified as “retributive justice,” where the focus is on making the offender suffer in a similar way to the victim’s harm.
- What action did the victim specifically want to take against the offender?
The victim specifically wanted to take matters into their own hands and inflict physical harm on the offender as payback for what had been done to them.
Questions Based on Ashley Smith: Out of Control (2010) - The Fifth Estate video
- What led to Ashley Smith’s initial incarceration, and how did her sentence extend over time?
Ashley Smith was first jailed for throwing a crabapple at a postal worker. Over time, her sentence grew longer due to multiple offenses in custody and her ongoing behavioral problems.
Assaulting staff or other inmates
Damaging property
Self-harm incidents
Non-compliance with prison rules
Disruptive behavior
- How did the correctional system respond to Ashley Smith’s self-harming behaviors, and what were the outcomes?
The correctional system placed Ashley in solitary confinement when she self-harmed, but this approach failed to help her. Her mental health worsened, and she continued to hurt herself.
- What role did solitary confinement play in Ashley Smith’s mental health and behavior?
Solitary confinement made Ashley’s mental health worse. It led to increased isolation, depression, and anxiety, contributing to more self-harming behavior.
- What were the consequences of correctional staff adhering to orders about intervening during Ashley Smith’s self-harm incidents?
Staff were told not to intervene during Ashley’s self-harm, leading to her injury and eventually her death. The failure to act showed a lack of proper care and concern.
- How did the public and media react to the release of footage showing Ashley Smith’s treatment in custody?
The public and media were shocked and outraged by the footage. It led to widespread criticism of how Ashley was treated and raised concerns about prison practices.
- What systemic issues within the Canadian correctional system were highlighted by Ashley Smith’s case?
Her case highlighted issues like poor mental health care, the overuse of solitary confinement, and the lack of appropriate treatment for vulnerable inmates
- Why were correctional staff ordered to reduce the frequent “use of force” during Ashley Smith’s self-harm episodes?
Staff were ordered to reduce the use of force because it was seen as damaging and ineffective, and it could worsen Ashley’s condition.
- What was Ashley Smith’s psychiatric or psychological diagnosis?
Ashley Smith was diagnosed with mental health issues like depression, anxiety, and borderline personality disorder, which contributed to her self-harming behavior.
Describe briefly the issues that surround the effectiveness of police strategies and operations
What makes it hard for police strategies and actions to work well?
- Responsibility and Openness: People are concerned when police officers act inappropriately, use excessive force, or fail to be open about their actions. Without accountability, the public may lose trust in the police, thinking they are not being held responsible for their actions. Transparency is important to show that the police are doing their job properly.
- Bias and Discrimination: Issues like racial profiling or treating certain communities unfairly can harm the relationship between the police and the public. When people feel that police are biased or discriminatory, they may lose confidence in law enforcement, making it harder for police to do their job effectively.
- Limited resrouce: Police departments often have limited resources, such as funding, staff, and equipment. This can affect their ability to respond quickly to crime or meet the needs of the community. When resources are stretched too thin, it can impact the quality of police work and the safety of the public.
- Community Trust: Building trust between the police and the community is essential for effective policing. If the public views the police negatively or believes they do not have their best interests at heart, it can lead to a breakdown in cooperation. Positive relationships are key to preventing crime and addressing community concerns.
- Technology and Innovation: The use of new technologies, like surveillance cameras, body cameras, or data collection tools, can help police do their job more effectively. However, this raises concerns about privacy and people’s civil rights. Striking the right balance between safety and individual freedoms is a major issue in modern policing.
Professional Model of Policing
Focus: Law enforcement, maintaining order
Approach: Reactive, centralized control, strict law enforcement
Strengths: Efficient and organized, Effective at addressing immediate crime issues
Weaknesses: Creates a disconnect with the community, Lacks focus on crime prevention
Main Goal: Enforce the law and maintain order
Community Policing
Focus: Building trust and collaboration with the community
Approach: Proactive, working directly with the community to solve problems
Strengths:
* Fosters trust between police and community
* Improves crime prevention
* Enhances quality of life in neighborhoods
Weaknesses:
* Time-consuming and resource-intensive
* May face resistance from some communities
Main Goal: Prevent crime by building positive relationships with the community
Community-Focused Strategic Policing
Focus: Addressing root causes of crime through partnerships and social services
Approach: Proactive, combines law enforcement with social service collaboration
Strengths:
* Long-term crime reduction
* Holistic approach to public safety
Weaknesses:
* Requires significant resources
* Depends on collaboration with various community groups
Main Goal: Solve social issues contributing to crime, reduce crime in the long-term
Describe the various techniques used in community-focused strategic policing.
- Crime Prevention: Focuses on long-term prevention by addressing social issues like poverty, education, and substance abuse
- Problem-solving policing: Police work with the community to address the root causes of crime.
- Community engagement: Officers build trust by attending meetings and interacting with community members.
- Hot spot policing: Police focus on high-crime areas to allocate resources effectively.
- youth programs and mentoring: Police mentor at-risk youth to prevent involvement in crime.
Summarize public attitudes toward and confidence in the police.
People’s views on the police vary. Some support the police for keeping people safe, but others, especially minorities, don’t trust them due to concerns about unfair treatment and violence. Trust is higher when police engage with the community but drops after incidents of police misconduct