correlations Flashcards
correlation analysis
looks for a relationship between two associated co-variables
allows us to establish the type of relationship between the variables: whether it is positive, negative or a zero relationship
positive correlation
as one co-variable increases, the other increases
correlation coefficient between 0 and +1
eg no hours spent revising v test scores
zero correlation
there is no relationship between the two co-variables
correlation coefficient of 0
eg amount of pets v test scores
negative correlation
as one co-variable increases, the other decreases
correlation coefficient of 0 and -1
eg no hours of sleep v likelihood of a car crash
scattergraphs
relationship between two co-variables can be expressed graphically on a scattergraph
distribution of data points on the graph indicates the direction and strength of the relationship between co-variables
correlation coefficients
relationship between two co-variables can be expressed quantitatively as a correlation coefficient
this is a number between -1 and +1 which indicates the direction and strength of the relationship between co-variables.
data sloping upwards from left to right
indicates a strong positive relationship between the co-variables
data sloping downwards from left to right
indicates a strong negative relationship between the co-variables
first strength of correlation analysis s
- shows the strength of the relationship between two co-variables
- expressed quantitatively with a correlation coefficient, proving a precise measure of how two variables are related
- correlation coefficient is a number between +1 and -1 which allows researchers to establish the direction and strength of the relationship between co-variables
- if the variables are strongly related, it may suggest hypotheses for future research
2nd strength of correlation analysis p
- unlike laboratory experiments (conducted in an artificial setting), it allows researchers to investigate behaviour that would be unethical to study in controlled conditions as it would cause physical or psychological harm which participants have the right not to experience
- this is due to CA making use of naturally occuring variation in the IV which is not directly manipulated by the experimenter
- eg it would be unethical to cause participants stress to see its effect on illness, so we use naturally occuring incidents of stress to shows the positive correlation with illness
1st limitation of correlation analysis c
unlike laboratory experiments (conducted in artificial settings with control over variables), a limitation is that correlation analysis is that it has a low level of control over confounding variables (which are any uncontrolled variables that could systematically affect the DV)
this is due to correlations often make use of the real world, naturally occuring variation in the IV and so do not have control over confounding variables
as a result, a third (unknown) variable could in fact be the cause of the observed relationship between two co-variables
2nd limitation of correlation analysis r
unlike lab experiments (conducted in an artificial setting with control over variables), a limitation is that it’s difficult to establish cause and effect which is when it is impossible to establish a casual relationship between two variables, lowering the internal validity of research
this is because correlation analysis only shows the strength and direction of the relationship between two co-variables; doesn’t show which variable caused the other.
in some cases, the direction of causality may appear clear, this isn’t true in every case
eg may appear that long-term stress causes illness however, becoming ill may cause stress.