Contracts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Offer: elements

A

(1) manifestation of intent to enter into a K; (2) certain and definite terms; (3) communicated to offeree

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Firm Offer

A

The general rule is that an offer can be revoked by the offeror at any time prior to acceptance. One exception to this rule is the Firm Offer under the UCC. A firm offer is irrevocable and requires that (1) a merchant (2) signed a writing (3) in which he made assurances to keep the offer open. If no time is stated, the offer will be kept open for a period of up to 3 months.

Note: “merchant” and “signed” are broadly defined (signature can be letterhead)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Does making an inquiry constitute a counteroffer and rejection?

A

No!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the remedies for breach of construction K–if owner breaches? if builder breaches?

A

Owner breaches:
––Before completion: builder gets lost profits + costs
––After completion: builder gets full K price + interest

Builder breaches:
––Cost of completion + costs of delay - benefit conferred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the 6 ways an offer can be terminated?

A

1) lapse of time
2) revocation
3) rejection
4) death b/f acceptance [but won’t terminate an irrevocable offer]
5) destruction of proposed K’s subject matter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

An offer generally terminates when the offeror revokes prior to acceptance. What are the 4 exceptions to this–i.e., when is an offer irrevocable before acceptance?

A

1) Option
2) Firm Offer (UCC)
3) Detrimental Reliance [GC/SC]
4) Beginning performance of unilateral K

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the exception to surety agreements being covered by the Statute of Frauds

A

If the main purpose of the promisor (surety) is to benefit himself, then the surety agreement does not need to be in writing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mistake

A

Mistake can be a defense to formation.

A mutual mistake will be a defense to formation and grounds for rescission if it goes to the essence of the contract–i.e., a mutual mistake of material fact as to the subject matter. A mutual mistake as to value will NOT be a defense.

A unilateral mistake is generally not a defense to formation; but, it can be when the non-mistaken party knows or should know of the mistake–in that situation, the party cannot take advantage of the mistake.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Promissory Estoppel/Detrimental Reliance + Remedy

A

Substitute for consideration.

Even where there is no consideration, a PROMISE can be enforced to PREVENT INJUSTICE if (1) the promisor should REASONABLY EXPECT to induce action/forbearance and (2) such action/forbearance is actually INDUCED. Under the modern view, if a court finds promissory estoppel, the remedy is reliance damages (not expectation damages).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Do modifications require consideration?

A

It depends…
––CL: the historical rule is that a modification must be supported by consideration pursuant to the Preexisting Duty Rule, but the modern trend allows for modifications that are not supported by consideration if it is fair and equitable and the need for the modification was not foreseeable at the time of the agreement.
–UCC: no; only requires good faith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Unconscionability

A

Operates as a defense to contract formation. Typically arises when one party has substantially superior BARGAINING POWER over the other party and can DICTATE the terms of the contract.

OPPRESSIVE TERMS or UNFAIR SURPRISE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Incapacity

A

Defense to contract formation. A party who lacks capacity–minor, intoxicated, mentally incompetent–at the time of contracting has the right to disaffirm the contract. A minor’s misrepresentation of her age does NOT defeat the defense of incapacity. However, a minor can impliedly affirm the contracting after reaching majority.

An incapacitated person will be liable in restitution for the reasonable value of necessaries (food; clothing; medical care).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Merchant’s Confirmatory Memo

A

Operates as an exception to the Statute of Frauds. Under the Statute of Frauds, sales of goods for $500 or more require a signed writing by the party to be bound. However, under the merchant’s confirmatory memo exception, if (1) both parties are merchants (2) the party seeking to enforce the contract signs a document confirming the details of the verbal agreement, including the quantity, and (3) there is no written objection from the party to be bound within 10 days, that satisfies the Statute of Frauds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When do the rights of an intended beneficiary vest?

A

(1) learns of the K + immediately sues
(2) learns of the K + assents to it
(3) learns of the K + relies on it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When are modifications allowed on a K that involves a 3P beneficiary?

A

It depends…
Step 1) is the beneficiary an intended beneficiary or an incidental beneficiary? If incidental, modifications are allowed anytime.
Step 2) if INTENDED beneficiary, the contract can be modified WITHOUT the intended beneficiary’s consent ONLY IF her rights have NOT VESTED

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Assignment

A

All contracts can be assigned–except where it (1) is prohibited by law (2) would substantially change the obligor’s duty (e.g., personal service K where services are unique) or (3) involves assignment of future rights to future Ks.

Is a writing required? NO
Is consideration required? NO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

When is an assignment revocable?

A

It depends on whether the assignment is for value or gratuitous?
––If for value: NOT revocable
––If gratuitous: revocable, unless detrimental reliance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Accord/Satisfaction

A

An accord is an agreement where one parties agrees to receive a different, future performance. Satisfaction is the performance of the accord agreement. An accord will SUSPEND performance of the original agreement; once the accord is SATISFIED, then the performance is excused (discharged). An accord requires consideration.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Purpose of K damages

A

Place non-breaching party in position she would have been in had the contract been performed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Anticipatory Repudiation

A

Clear indication of intent not to perform. Mere doubt is not enough.

21
Q

When does breach occur?

A

Promisor under absolute duty to perform + that duty has not been discharged + promisor fails to perform

Non-breaching party must show she is willing and able to perform, but for other party’s breach

22
Q

Breach: CL

A

SUBSTANTIAL PERFORMANCE DOCTRINE
Is the breach material or minor?

Minor: non-breaching party has received substantial benefit of bargain –> non-breaching party can sue for damages, but cannot suspend her own performance

Major: non-breaching party has not received substantial benefit of bargain –> non-breaching party can stop her performance, treat K as being at an end, and immediately se for damages
––factors: (a) benefit conferred; (b) extent of part performance; (c) adequacy of compensation for damages
––failure to perform on time is generally not material, unless K provides that time is of the essence

23
Q

Breach: UCC

A

PERFECT TENDER RULE
Buyer can accept all, reject all, or accept some

Right to reject will be cut off by acceptance. Buyer can accept by (i) indicating her acceptance to seller; (ii) failing to reject within reasonable time; (iii) acts inconsistent with seller’s ownership

24
Q

UCC: when can a buyer revoke his acceptance of goods?

A

Defect that substantially impairs value AND
––(i) accepted on reasonable belief defect would be cured, and it has not been cured; OR
––(ii) defect was not discoverable upon a reasonable inspection at the time of acceptance or seller made assurances that goods conformed to K

Revocation must be made in reasonable time and b/f substantial change to the goods occurs

25
Q

UCC: what are the exceptions to the perfect tender rule

A

(1) - Installment Ks. An installment can only be rejected if there is a substantial non-conformance that cannot be cured. The entire contract is only breached if the non-conformity substantially impairs the value of the entire K.

(2) - Seller’s Right to cure
––If there is still time for performance under the K, seller can cure by giving notice and shipping conformity goods, which buyer must accept
––If time for performance has expired, the seller has no right to cure. But, if seller shipped non-conforming goods reasonably believing that they would be acceptable, seller will have further reasonable time to make a conforming tender.

26
Q

What are a seller’s delivery obligations for a common carrier case, and how do they impact risk of loss?

A

For a shipment K (“FOB + [seller’s city]”)…
––Seller has to get goods to CC, make delivery arrangements, and notify the buyer. Once that happens, the risk of loss passes to the buyer.
––Note: shipment Ks are presumed

For a destination K (“FOB + [buyer’s city]”)…
––Seller has to get goods all the way to specific destination. Once that happens, the risk of loss passes to the buyer.

27
Q

Who bears the risk of loss in non-carrier cases

A

If seller = merchant –> seller bears risk of loss until buyer has possession

If seller = non-merchant –> seller bears risk of loss until he tenders the goods

28
Q

Anticipatory Repudiation v. Prospective Failure to Perform

A

Anticipatory Repudiation is unequivocal, and allows a party to a) rescind K b) sue immediately c) suspend own performance and wait to sue until performance date or d) urge promisor to perform. Note that a party can retract his repudiation, unless the non-repudiating party has detrimentally relied.

Prospective failure to perform is conduct or words that raises mere doubts about performance. The innocent party can suspend performance until she seeks adequate assurances. If she does not receive adequate assurances, she can treat as repudiation.

29
Q

Failure to perform part of a divisible K

A

If a party performs for one of the units, but not the rest, he is entitled to payment for the one unit. This is just the idea that in a divisible contract, performance of the entire contract is not a condition precedent for the other party’s liability.

30
Q

Can a party waive a condition without consideration?

A

Yes, but for it to be effective, it must be ancillary or collateral to the main purpose of the K

31
Q

Discharge by Impossibility

A
  • -Non-occurrence of event was a basic assumption of the parties at time of contracting and neither party assumed the risk of the event occurring
  • -Contractual duties will be discharged if they have become IMPOSSIBLE to perform. The test for impossibility is objective–i.e., the duties cannot be performed by ANYONE.
  • -Note that impossibility can be partial (duty discharged to limited extent) or temporary (duty suspended)

Examples
––death of necessary person
––supervening illegality
––destruction of subject matter or means of performance
––Note: for UCC, where a seller bears the risk of loss when the goods are destroyed and the destroyed goods had been identified to the K, the seller’s performance WILL be EXCUSED

32
Q

Discharge by Impracticability

A
  • -Non-occurrence of event was a basic assumption of the parties at time of contracting and neither party assumed the risk of the event occurring
  • -Party has encountered EXTREME AND UNREASONABLE DIFFICULTY/EXPENSE
  • -Mere increase in costs ≠ impracticability; however, shortage of raw materials due to a strike (or similar event) will be ground for discharge of performance
33
Q

Discharge by Frustration

A
  • -Non-occurrence of event was a basic assumption of the parties at time of contracting and neither party assumed the risk of the event occurring
  • -Contract has become VALUELESS by supervening event (i.e., K purpose has been destroyed). Both parties must have REALIZED the central purpose of the K at the time of making.
34
Q

Risk of Loss: Common Carrier

A

note: if one of the parties was in breach, she will bear risk of loss. If not, then see below

If delivery by CC, risk of loss shifts to buyer when seller completed its “delivery obligations.”

Shipment K [default]
––tip off: “FOB Seller City”
––S must (1) make arrangements w/ CC; (2) get goods to CC; and (3) notify B

Destination K
––tip off: “FOB Buyer City”
––S must get goods all the way to destination

35
Q

Risk of Loss: Non-Common Carrier

A

note: if one of the parties was in breach, she will bear risk of loss. If not, then see below

If merchant-seller: M-S bears risk of loss until B takes possession

If non-merchant seller: B bears risk of loss once seller tenders the goods (i.e., makes them available to buyer)

36
Q

Requirements K / Output K

A

Requirements K: B agrees to buy all requirements from S and S agrees to sell that amount

Output K: S promises to sell to B all the goods that S makes and B agrees to buy that amount

  • Not illusory b/c of exclusivity
  • UCC assumes parties will act in good faith
  • Can’t tender or demand an unreasonably disproportionate quantity
37
Q

Elements of indirect revocation of an offer

A

(1) conduct by offeror indicating he’s changed his mind

(2) offeree is aware of the conduct

38
Q

Acceptance that includes additional or different terms

A

CL: Mirror Image Rule. An acceptance that does not mirror the offer is a rejection.

UCC: No mirror image rule.
––Additional terms: included if (1) both merchants (2) not a material change and (3) no objection from offeror in a reasonable time
––Different terms: some courts apply the same test; some courts apply the knock out rule and gap fill

39
Q

What is the trigger situation for the CL Preexisting Duty Rule and what are the 5 exceptions?

A

Trigger: under CL, new consideration is required to modify a K. Preexisting duty to perform is not sufficient consideration.

Exceptions to PED
(1) mod is fair and equitable given circumstances parties did not anticipate at time of contracting
(2) duty is owed to a third person
–––e.g., A and B have K where A provides service and B pays $10. Prior to performance, A demands $15 instead. C promises to pay the extra $5. A can enforce C’s promise.
(3) promise is to ratify a voidable obligation (minor’s debt)
(4) honest dispute
(5) new or different consideration is promised

40
Q

X owes Company $1000. That debt is barred by the statute of limitations. Despite this, X promises to pay Company out of the goodness of his heart. If X later changes his mind, will he be required to pay?

A

Yes. A promise to pay a time-barred debt does not require consideration.

41
Q

Trigger situation for implied acceptance

A

Buyer keeps goods after having a reasonable opportunity to inspect them

42
Q

Can a seller refuse a check?

A

Yes–but that gives B additional time to come up with cash

43
Q

Can a repudiation be retracted?

A

Yes, so long as it has not been relied upon

44
Q

Is consideration required for a valid waiver of a condition?

A

No, but the condition must be ancillary or collateral

45
Q

Damages: What are S’s damages if B breaches? What are B’s damages if S breaches?

A

S’s damages if B breaches

(a) Resale: K price - resale price
(b) Market: K price - market price
(c) Contract: Entire K price [used when custom goods]
(d) Lost profits: [used when S = lost volume dealer]

B’s damages if S breaches

(a) Cover: Cover price - K price
(b) Market: Market price - K price [used when B does not cover in good faith or does not cover at all]
(c) Loss in value: [used when B keeps non-conforming goods]

46
Q

What is the effective of a K that says “no assignments” but rights are assigned anyway? What about where the K says any assignments are “void”?

A

“No assignments”: If the assignee did not have knowledge of the clause, he can still recover from the obligor

“Void”: assignee will not be able to collect from the obligor

47
Q

What are the rules when there are multiple assignments of the same rights?

A
  • Last gratuitous assignment prevails
  • First assignment for value (consideration) prevails over subsequent assignments for value and all gratuitous assignments

Exception: a subsequent assignee for value (call him Y) will prevail over a prior assignee for value (call him X) if Y did not know of X’s assignment and was the first to get payment

48
Q

Does a delegating party remain liable on a K?

A

Yes, absent a novation