Con Law Flashcards
Type of process required: Commitment to Mental Institution
Adults: prior notice + prior evid. hearing
Children: prior screening by neutral fact finder
Type of process required: Welfare Benefits
Prior notice + prior evid. hearing
Type of process required: Disability Benefits
Prior notice + opportunity to respond + subsequent evid. hearing
Type of process required: public employment (tenured or termination only for cause)
Prior notice + opportunity to respond + subsequent evid. hearing
Type of process required: public education
Prior notice + opportunity to respond
Type of process required: DL suspension
Prior evid. hearing, unless breathalyzer suspension statute
Type of process required: child custody
Prior notice + prior evid. hearing
Type of process required: civil forfeiture
Real property: prior notice + prior evid. hearing
Personal property: subsequent notice + subsequent hearing
Type of process required: detention of citizen enemy combatant
Subsequent notice + meaningful opportunity to be heard
Procedural Due Process: Test for deprivation –> what level of process is required?
The level of process that is required before deprivation of liberty or property depend on the circumstances. Courts weigh (a) the importance of the individual interest and (b) the value of specific procedural safeguards to that interest against (c) the government’s interest in fiscal and administrative efficiency
Procedural Due Process: property
Legitimate claim or entitlement to benefit under state law
Takings Clause
Government is prohibited from TAKING private property for PUBLIC USE without JUST COMPENSATION
Takings Clause: What constitutes a “taking”?
- Physical invasion or appropriation; even if temporary, unless emergency situation
- Denial of ALL economic use of the land, unless the owner is causing a nuisance; if temporary, it could be a taking, depending on the circumstances (does fairness and justice require compensation?)
- MERE DECREASE in economic value is generally NOT a taking. Courts consider (i) social goal (ii) diminution (iii) if there is substantial interference w/ investment-backed expectation
Is a zoning ordinance that prohibits the most beneficial use of the property a “taking”?
No–its a regulation, which does NOT require just compensation!
Is an exaction a “taking”?
Yes, unless (1) the condition relates to a legitimate gov’t interest and (2) the adverse impact of the development is proportional to owner’s loss from the forced transfer
What is an exaction?
It’s where local government will condition a building permit on the landowner giving the gov’t some of the property or granting an easement
Takings Clause: what is the test for “public use”
Rational Basis! Taking must be RATIONALLY related to a LEGITIMATE public purpose
Takings Clause: how is “just compensation” measured
FMV @ time taken–measured by loss to OWNER
What does an owner do when the gov’t takes his property without a condemnation proceeding?
Bring an action for inverse condemnation, seeking just compensation or temporary taking damages
Trigger for Substantive DP issue v. EP issue
Substantive DP: law denies all persons right to engage in activity EP: law treats person/class differently from others
Standards of Review for DP and EP
SS: gov’t must show law is necessary to achieve a compelling gov’t interest; narrowly tailored and LRM
IS: gov’t must show law is substantially related to achieve an important gov’t interest
RB: π must show the law is not rationally related to achieve a legitimate gov’t interest
Application of SS or IS requires a showing of intentional discrimination. That can be satisfied by…
a) facial classification
b) facially-neutral, but discriminatory application
c) discriminatory motive
- -note: discriminatory impact, standing alone, is NOT enough
Is diversity a compelling gov’t interest in public education?
It depends…
- -Primary/Secondary school: no
- -Public university: yes; but uni must show no race neutral alternatives and race cannot be predominant factor in admissions
What standard applies to alienage classifications?
It depends…
- -Federal: rational basis
- -State: strict scrutiny, except for laws that concern participation in state gov’t (police officer; jury; voting; probation officer; primary/secondary school teacher; elective office)
Note: classifications re undocumented aliens are subject to rational basis
What standard applies to gender classifications
IS, including intentional discrimination against males
What standard applies to legitimacy classifications
IS. State can’t enact discriminatory regulation intending to punish non-martial children
What are the four categories of fundamental rights?
Privacy; Voting; Interstate Travel; 1A
What are the rights that fall under privacy?
C-A-M-P-P-E-R-S
Contraception; Abortion; Marriage; Parental Rights + Procreation; Extended Family (right to keep together); Reading obscene material in the home; Sex
What is the current test for abortion?
Pre-viability: Undue burden
Post-viability: State can enact restrictions on abortion to protect health of the fetus, but must allow an abortion if necessary to protect woman’s health
What are examples re undue burden for abortion?
Undue burden: admitting privileges; spousal notification
No undue burden: licensed physician; parental consent of minor, if judicial bypass procedure available; 24-hour waiting period; required info for informed consent
Vote dilution: drawing districts
When states draw CONGRESSIONAL districts: almost exact mathematical equality is required.
–When Congress apportions: good faith
When states draw LOCAL districts: reasonable variance is OK (16% = constitutional; while 30% = no good). Exceptions: at-large elections and special purpose elections
Durational residency requirements can violate the right to interstate travel under some circumstances. When are such requirements valid/invalid
VALID
- -30 days to vote in state
- -1 year to get divorced in state
INVALID
- -1 year to vote in state
- -1 year to get full welfare benefits
- -1 year to get state healthcare
State action requirement + exceptions
To show a constitutional violation, state action must be involved. Exceptions…
- -Exclusive Public Function: e.g., running a town or an election
- -SIGNIFICANT state involvement in facilitating private action: when a state affirmatively authorizes, encourages, or facilitates acts of discrimination by private citizens.
- —-This includes enforcing racially restrictive covenants and leasing premises to a discriminatory lessee where the state derives an extra benefit.
- —-This does NOT include granting a license and providing essential services to a private club or granting a monopoly to a utility. This does NOT include a land grant to a private organization that later adopts discriminatory practices.
1A: restrictions on commercial speech
[Apply quasi-IS standard]. If the commercial speech is neither misleading nor fraudulent, the government can only place a restriction if (1) there is a SUBSTANTIAL gov’t interest; (2) the restriction DIRECTLY ADVANCES that interest; and (3) the restriction is NARROWLY tailored.
Commerce Clause
C-I-A
Congress can regulate (1) Channels of interstate commerce; (2) Instrumentalities of interstate commerce; and (3) Activities that have a substantial affect on interstate commerce.
Congress can regulate INTRAstate activity if (1) regulation concerns commercial or economic activity (2) there is a RATIONAL BASIS on which Congress could conclude that the the activity in AGGREGATE substantially affects INTERstate commerce.
When the INTRAstate activity is non-commercial, there is no aggregation, and the regulation will only be upheld if there is a showing of a direct substantial economic effect on interstate commerce
1A: Regulation of Gov’t Employee Speech
If the speech was within the gov’t employee’s official duties, the gov’t can regulate/punish based on the content (irrespective of whether it is a matter of public concern).
If the speech was NOT within the gov’t employee’s official duties and does NOT involve a matter of public concern, the gov’t has wide deference to regulate/punish speech that is disruptive to the work environment
If the speech was NOT within the gov’t employee’s official duties but DOES involve a matter of public concern, the speech can be punished/regulated only if government’s interest in providing public service outweighs the citizen’s interest in commenting on the matter.