Contracts Flashcards
What is consideration?
A bargained for exchange of something of legal value
What are the substitutes for consideration?
Detrimental reliance, promissory estoppel, or good faith modification
UCC SALE OF GOODS CONTRACT IS STILL VALID IF THERE IS A MISSING PRICE TERM
Reasonable terms will be supplied by the COURT if those terms are consistent with the parties INTENT
Death or incapacity of either party will also terminate an offer. If you die or don’t have legal capacity to enter into a contract. What are the exceptions?
1) Options contracts. If someone paid for the option… and the person on the other side dies… sorry… we paid for the option, OFFER IS STILL ALIVE; AND
2) Part performance of an offer when entering into a unilateral contract.
Option Contract
The offeror promises to keep the offer open and the offeree pays for the privilege of the offer being kept open (if no consideration is paid, the offer can be revoked at any time)
Firm offer rule
Must be UCC sale of goods
Offeror must be a merchant (someone who REGULARLY deals in goods of a certain kind or someone with specialized knowledge of the business practices involved); AND
A written and signed offer that PROMISES to keep an offer open for a certain period of time
If these elements are met, the offer cannot be revoked for up to 3 months… and there is no need for consideration to make this offer firm.
Detrimental reliance
An offer cannot be revoked if there has been detrimental reliance by the offeree
Part performance of a unilateral contract
It won’t be revocable for a reasonable time in which the offeree could complete performance
Conditional acceptances are essentially counteroffers
Under BOTH the common law and the UCC this terminates the offer and then becomes a new offer.
Mirror Image Rule
Acceptance to create a valid, enforceable contract, it must exactly match the terms of the offer.
For merchants, if a material (important) term is added that alters the original bargain
It is not incorporated unless it is agreed to
For merchants, if it is NOT a material term
it is incorporated unless it is objected to
Accommodation for goods
(1) accept the shipment and pay the list price, or (2) reject it with no remedy.
Accommodation is treated as a counteroffer with no breach.
Mailbox rule for option contracts
Acceptances are not effective until they are received by the offeror
If the offer says “acceptance is only to be effective when RECEIVED”
The mailbox rule does not apply.
The Double Mailbox -> Acceptance and then Rejection
whichever arrives first wins.
When we send an acceptance first… then a rejection next… A contract will be formed.
UNLESS the rejection arrives FIRST and is relied upon by the offeror.
OFFER GIVEN -> ACCEPTANCE MAILED -> REJECTION MAILED -> OFFEROR RECEIVES REJECTION FIRST & RELIES ON IT -> THEN OFFEROR RECEIVES ACCEPTANCE =
NO CONTRACT
Rejection and THEN acceptance
whichever arrives first controls
An offeror’s revocation of an offer is not effective until the offeree RECEIVES it.
The contract price is not the measure of recovery in quasi-contracts.
You will get the reasonable value of the benefits conferred ONLY.
Restitution or “quasi-contract” is only available for TOTAL breach, not partial breach.
Missing Terms UCC
Gap fillers for price, time of shipment, place of delivery, time of payment
Missing Terms Common Law
so long as the parties have shown a willingness to enter into a contract… the court will try to fill any holes with reasonable terms.
Promissory Estoppel
(1) A Promise, (2) Reasonable, Foreseeable and Detrimental Reliance, and (3) Enforcement Necessary to Avoid Injustice
Common Law Modification
Requires consideration to be valid
Accord
New agreement by the parties to an already existing obligation to accept a DIFFERENT promise instead of the original promise, with consideration on both sides
An accord suspends the other party’s right to enforce and must be supported by different consideration.
The performance of the accord results in satisfaction - which discharges BOTH the accord and the ORIGINAL contract!!!
Defenses to Enforceability
Incapacity to Contract, Infants (under 18), Mentally incompetent, Intoxication,
When a mistake of both parties at the time the contract was made as to a BASIC ASSUMPTION on which the contract was made has a material effect on the agreed exchange of performances, the contract is ________
VOIDABLE by the party that got screwed
If the parties use a material term that is open to at least two reasonable interpretations… and EACH party attaches a different meaning to the term… and NEITHER party has reason to know the meaning attached by the other
There is no contract, it is VOIDABLE
In UCC contracts, words prevail over NUMBERS.
If the contract is for “two hundred thousand dollars ($2,000)” it will be for $200,000 because WORDS will win out over numbers in the UCC contracts.
Statute of Frauds - Sales of goods worth $500 or more exceptions
Mnemonic: SWAP
Specially manufactured goods
Written confirmation of oral agreement between merchants (we want merchants to go fast… and if one sends a confirmation memo and the other merchant doesn’t object… that’s good enough for us. Battle of the forms lifestyle. No writing needed)
Admission in a pleading that a contract for goods existed
Partial payment or delivery that has been made and accepted
A writing is not needed for a simple promise to pay… it is needed when someone promises to pay if someone else does NOT
EXCEPTION:
If guaranteeing the loan PRIMARILY BENEFITS the promisor… we are not worried about the Statute of Frauds and no writing is required.
If 2 merchants have an oral understanding… and one of them sends a signed written confirmation, this will be enough to satisfy the statute of frauds… EVEN IF the recipient didn’t sign.
So long as the recipient doesn’t object within 10 days
In a real estate transfer contract, partial performance by the buyer of real estate can satisfy the statute of frauds
If we have 2/3
Partial payment;
Possession;
Buyer’s improvements of real estate.
Partial Integration
The parties agree on everything in the writing itself, but the writing does not reflect EVERYTHING they ACTUALLY agreed to.
Full or Total Integration
The writing is BOTH (a) final as to ALL the terms it recites on the sheet of paper, and (b) COMPLETE (any and every term they agreed on is included here)
If the bar exam says there is no merger clause it is a ____________
this is partial integration
Exceptions to parol evidence rule
1) Conditions precedent exception
2) Collateral agreement exception
3) Sale of goods (course of performance, trade usage, or course of dealing)
Even if a contract is COMPLETELY INTEGRATED
parol evidence can still get in to interpret, clarify or explain a term in the contract