Content of all studies Flashcards
Bartlett (1932)
Aim: To investigate how memory is influenced by cultural factors and schemas.
Method: British participants read “The War of the Ghosts” (American) and then recalled it after varying intervals (short and long).
IV: Time interval between reading and recall.
DV: Accuracy of recall (number of details remembered and distortions).
Results: Participants altered the story to fit their cultural backgrounds, showing memory is reconstructive; details were omitted or changed to align with their experiences.
Rogers and Kesner
Aim: Investigate the role of acetylcholine in memory formation.
Method: Administered scopolamine (an acetylcholine inhibitor) to rats before navigating a maze.
Results: Rats given scopolamine made more errors in the maze.
Conclusion: Acetylcholine is important for the consolidation of spatial memories.
Brown and Kulik (1977)
Aim: To investigate how surprising and personally significant events trigger flashbulb memories.
Method: 80 participants (40 Black and 40 White American men) completed a questionnaire about significant events, like the deaths of JFK and MLK.
Results: 90% remembered details about the event day; accuracy varied by personal relevance: 75% of Black participants recalled MLK’s death vs. 33% of White participants.
Conclusion: Suggested a biological mechanism for flashbulb memories but didn’t investigate it further; noted limitations included retrospective data and a small, specific sample affecting causality and generalisability.
Caspi et al (2003)
Aim: Investigate gene-environment interaction (G x E) for the serotonin transporter gene (5-HTT) in relation to depression.
Method: Sample of 847 New Zealanders (age 26), divided into three groups based on 5-HTT alleles:
Group 1: Two short alleles
Group 2: One short, one long allele
Group 3: Two long alleles Participants completed a “Stressful Life Events” questionnaire and were assessed for depression.
Results:
Individuals with one or more short alleles showed more depression symptoms and suicidal ideation in response to stressful events.
The effect was strongest with increased stressors; inheritance of the gene alone was not sufficient for depression.
Conclusion: Interaction between genetic predisposition and environmental stressors increases the likelihood of developing depression.
Draganski (2004)
Aim: To investigate how learning a new skill (juggling) affects brain structure.
Method: Participants (jugglers and non-jugglers) underwent initial MRI scans for baseline brain structure. Jugglers learned a three-ball routine and had a second MRI after mastering it, followed by a third MRI three months later (after stopping juggling).
Results: Jugglers showed increased grey matter in the mid-temporal area, linked to visual memory, after learning to juggle. This increase diminished after they stopped practicing. Non-jugglers showed no significant changes.
Conclusion: Brain changes were associated with the practice of juggling, indicating that skills can lead to structural brain modifications.
Englich and Mussweiler (2001)
Aim: To investigate how suggested sentences from a prosecutor influence judges’ sentencing decisions.
Method: 19 young trial judges were divided into two groups: one received a low anchor (2 months) and the other a high anchor (34 months). Participants recommended a sentence after reviewing the case.
Results: Judges given the low anchor recommended an average of 18.78 months, while those with the high anchor recommended 28.70 months.
Conclusion: The study demonstrated a cause-and-effect relationship between anchor values and sentencing, supporting the existence of anchoring bias. However, the small sample size and the specific demographic of judges limit the generalisability of the findings to broader populations.
HM: Milner (1966)
Aim: To examine the effects of surgery that removed parts of HM’s medial temporal lobes, including the hippocampus, to treat epilepsy.
Results: HM developed severe anterograde amnesia, losing the ability to form new long-term memories but retaining childhood memories and motor skills.
Conclusion: Brenda Milner’s extensive research demonstrated the critical role of the hippocampus in converting short-term memories into long-term ones, significantly enhancing the understanding of memory localisation in the brain.
Loftus and Palmer (1974)
Aim: To investigate how the phrasing of questions influences eyewitness memory.
Method: Participants watched video clips of car accidents and were asked to estimate the speed of the cars using different verbs (e.g., “smashed,” “collided,” “bumped,” “hit,” “contacted”).
Results: The verb used significantly affected speed estimates, with stronger verbs like “smashed” leading to higher estimates.
Conclusion: The study demonstrated the malleability of memory, suggesting that leading questions can distort eyewitness testimony.
Maguire (2000)
Aim: To investigate the brain structure of London taxi drivers, known for their extensive knowledge of the city’s streets.
Method: Conducted a single-blind study comparing brain scans of right-handed London taxi drivers to right-handed males who were not taxi drivers.
Results: Found that taxi drivers had significantly larger posterior hippocampi and smaller anterior hippocampi compared to control subjects. The volume of the right posterior hippocampus correlated with the duration of taxi driving experience. No significant differences were observed in other brain areas.
Conclusion: The study supports the idea of neuroplasticity, suggesting that the posterior hippocampus is involved in recalling spatial information, as taxi drivers rely on this knowledge daily.
McGaugh and Cahill (1995)
Aim: To investigate the impact of emotional arousal on memory retention.
Method: Participants viewed a series of slides paired with either a neutral story or an emotionally intense story.
Results: Participants exposed to the emotionally charged story recalled more details about the slides. Emotional arousal was found to enhance memory retention, influenced by stress hormones like adrenaline.
Conclusion: The study highlights the role of emotional arousal in strengthening memory consolidation.
Newcomer et al (1999)
Aim: To examine the effects of elevated cortisol on verbal declarative memory.
Method:
Participants: Healthy employees and students at Washington University Medical Center.
Design: Double-blind experiment with three conditions:
- High cortisol: 160 mg/day for 4 days
- Low cortisol: 40 mg/day
- Placebo
Task: Participants recalled prose paragraphs at baseline, one day after, and four days after treatment.
Results:
- The high cortisol group showed impaired recall.
- Memory performance normalized after treatment cessation.
- No significant differences between low-dose and placebo groups.
Conclusion: High cortisol levels negatively affect recall, indicating a link between stress hormones and memory performance.The high cortisol group showed impaired recall.
Memory performance normalized after treatment cessation.
No significant differences between low-dose and placebo groups.
Conclusion: High cortisol levels negatively affect recall, indicating a link between stress hormones and memory performance.
Rogers and Kesner (2003)
Aim: To investigate the role of the neurotransmitter acetylcholine in memory formation.
Method: Rats were trained to navigate a maze, then injected with either scopolamine (which blocks acetylcholine receptors) or a placebo.
Results: Rats given scopolamine took longer and made more mistakes in the maze compared to the control group.
Conclusion: Acetylcholine is crucial for the formation and retrieval of spatial memory.
Rosenzweig et al (1972)
Aim: To study the effects of environmental enrichment on brain plasticity in rats.
Method: Rats were raised in either enriched or impoverished environments.
Results: Rats in enriched environments had thicker cerebral cortices and greater brain weight compared to those in impoverished environments.
Conclusion: Stimulation from enriched environments positively affects brain development and neural growth.
Sparrow (2011)
Definition: The tendency to forget information easily found online, affecting declarative memory. Digital amnesia.
Study 1:
Participants: 60 Harvard undergraduates.
Design: 2 x 2 independent samples (Save vs. Erase; Remember vs. Not Asked to Remember).
Procedure: Participants typed trivia facts, with half saving and half erasing their entries. Then recalled facts.
Results:
No significant difference in recall based on memory prompts.
Participants who thought information would be saved recalled less.
Study 2:
Participants: 34 Columbia undergraduates.
Procedure: Typed trivia facts, each linked to a folder (unknown to participants). Then recalled facts and folder names.
Results:
Better recall for folder names than for facts.
Suggests reliance on external memory reduces effort to remember information.
Conclusion: Confidence in online information storage leads to reduced encoding and retrieval effort for important information.
Tversky and Kahnemann (1974)
Aim: To examine how anchoring effects influence numerical estimations.
Method: High-school students were divided into two groups:
Ascending group estimated
1×2×3×4×5×6×7×8 in 5 seconds.
Descending group estimated
8×7×6×5×4×3×2×1 in 5 seconds.
Results:
Median estimate for the ascending group: 512
Median estimate for the descending group: 2250
Actual product: 40,320
Conclusion: Participants’ estimates were influenced by the anchoring effect, with the ascending group providing lower estimates and the descending group providing higher estimates based on their starting point.