Consolidating the Kingdom of Italy, 1861-70 Flashcards
What obstacles did the French pose to Italian unity after 1861?
- French troops still in Rome and Napoleon III would not withdraw them
- In late 1860, Napoleon proposed that if Umbria and the Marches were returned to Papal power, and Abruzzi also, then the French would leave. This was unacceptable to VEII
- At a convention in September 1864 (The September Convention) Napoleon agreed to evacuate Rome in return for the switch of the Italian capital from Turin to Florence
- When the Italian government led by Minghetti agreed, there was a storm of protest and 23 people died in rioting in Turin. VEII sacked Minghetti
What obstacles did the Austrians pose to Italian unity after 1861?
- They had lost Lombardy but they had no intention of quitting Venetia where they maintained a large army
- The Great Powers also supported Austria’s position to maintain the balance of power in Europe
- Cavour had tried to encourage Hungarian revolutionary leaders to start an uprising but it came to nothing
- Austria’s position was also weakened by the increased power of Prussia, who made a free trade treaty with France in 1862 and excluded Austria
What threat did Austria and France both pose to Italy by 1861?
By 1861 both the French and the Austrians maintained their control over parts of Italy. They were both still militarily and diplomatically more powerful than the new Italian state.
What happened to the Italian state in June 1861 and what followed?
- In June 1861, Italy lost it’s most successful politician, Cavour, to Malaria
- A succession of men followed Cavour. Ricasoli (1861-1862), Ratazzi (1862), Farini (1862-1863), Minghetti (1863-1864), and La Marmora (1864-1866).
- None of them were of the same calibre as Cavour and were largely ignorant of Italian politics
How were Ricasoli and, more critically, Ratazzi weakened by Garibaldi?
Neither Ricasoli no Ratazzi objected to Garibaldi’s agitation over Rome.
In 1862, Garibaldi set up the ‘Society for the Emancipation of Rome’, and attempted to attack Rome
Ratazzi was forced to stop him with troops as not to upset the French, but now he was seem as anti Italian nationalism and was soon sacked
What did all prime ministers after Cavour suffer from?
All ministers suffered from a lack of support from the King, combined with a weak parliamentary discipline
Farini even tried to stab the King and was removed from office!
Why did Mazzini and Gioberti dislike the new Italian state?
There was no republic, as Mazzini had hoped, and no federation under the Pope as hoped for by Gioberti. Mazzini described the new Italy as a “sham”.
What a whiny bitch.
Why could the new Italian state be seen as undemocratic?
The government was mostly made up of Piedmontese nobility and the educated middle class. An all male parliament was elected by a narrow electorate which made up 2% of the population (literate, male taxpayers from northern Italy), totally unrepresentative of the masses
There were 443 members of parliament elected by a mere 150,000 voters. The King even kept the title “the second” rather than VEI of Italy
What were some early, positive legal changes to Italy?
- A single criminal legal code was adopted except for Tuscany and a civil law code was in the whole of Italy from 1865
- A unified Italian army was formed and modernised under Prussian guidance
- A unified Navy was formed
- Schools and universities came under state control as a way to create a unified education system
Why was the Pope annoyed by the new state of Italy?
In March 1861, Cavour faced a lot of opposition from the Pope who had lost two-thirds of his land to the new kingdom
He was also threatened by the claims of nationalists for Rome as the natural capital of Italy
The Pope’s temporal power had also been largely destroyed by the Risorgimento and Cavour hoped that the Pope would give up Rome in return for Church freedom of action
What was the Fractious cohabitation, and what did Catholics who supported the Pope suppose other Catholics should do?
The Church ignored Cavour and so began a period of Fractious Cohabitation, an uneasy relationship between church and state
In 1858, a Catholic paper editor Margotti had argued that Catholics should be “neither electors no elected”. The Church’s spiritual power was also under threat from scientific theory, such as Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species (1859)
Theologians, such as the French Catholic Renan, also said in the early 1860s that the Bible should not be treated as accurate.
What did the Pope set out in his Syllabus of Errors in 1864?
- The Church would retain control over the education system and all culture and science
- The Catholic Church rejected all ideas of tolerance for other religions
- The Church reasserted its temporal power
- It criticised Liberalism, attacked religious toleration, freedom of expression and thought, as well as socialism, nationalism, and communism
- It would not accept modern progress and modern civilisation
How did the Italian state react to the Syllabus of Errors?
In response, the new Italian state, which had been rejected by the Pope in his earlier Allocution, began to attack Church property
They made the Church increase taxation to the state, and in 1866, demanded that the Church hand over property
How did the Pope double down on his Syllabus of Errors?
The Church was losing its temporal power, so turned its attention more heavily to the spiritual role.
In 1869, the Vatican Council met and agreed to the Dogma of Papal Infallibility, which stated that the Pope’s statements were indisputable. When it was proclaimed in July 1870, it marked the spiritual supremacy of the Pope
The situation was made worse when the Pope declared himself a prisoner in the Vatican following the annexation of Rome in 1870
What was the problem of the plebscites used in 1861?
Italy was socially, politically, and economically diverse. The plebiscites =in 1860 covered up many issued.
Firstly, people voted against the tyranny of the rulers and revolts of the peasantry, not really for unification
Secondly, the voting systems were corrupt, e.g. in Nice the “no” slips were not even brought to the voting stations. The “yes” voters didn’t really know what they were voting for. Was it a federation or a centralised one?
How little understanding did the Piedmontese politicians have of the South, and what problems did Garibaldi leave in the South?
Piedmontese politicians had very little understanding of the South. Its backwardness and poverty meant it was unsuitable for unification with Piedmont.
An example of this was in 1859 when the Casati Law made primary education compulsory, yet it didn’t happen in the South as the majority were illiterate
As for Garibaldi, his invasion had promised land reform and improved living standards, but these weren’t forthcoming
How did Cavour decide to deal with the South upon unification?
Both southern states, Sicily and Naples, had a long tradition of regional autonomy. After considering “self-government” for the south, Cavour decided to crush any opposition in the south, whether loyal to the Bourbons, the remnants of Garibaldi’s army, peasants demanding land reform or those hoping for some freedom.
Cavour ordered Farini south to crush opposition following an October 1860 uprising by Bourbon agents, leading thousands of peasants against the Pro Garibaldi national guards.
What was Piedmontisation, and how far did Piedmont go in Naples?
The new government in Turin decided to impose Piedmonts systems over the whole peninsula - Italy became Piedmontised at an almost indecent rate
The South’s distinct features made it entirely unsuitable for unification with Piedmont. The legal system of Naples, for example, was changed by 53 decrees (!) in just two days, in February 1861
How did Piedmontisation divide up Italy, and unify some civilian functions?
The new kingdom was divided up into 53 provinces, each governed by a prefect.
All customs, coinage, weights, and measures were standardised, at least in theory, and the Piedmontese constitution became the Italian constitution
How did Piedmontisation display regional ignorance, and attack the church?
Showed ignorance of regional affairs in Italy, particularly ignorance of the north to conditions in Naples and Sicily. Cavour never travelled further south than Tuscany.
Education had to be paid for by attacking the Church, leading to the dissolution of 2382 monasteries and convents which deprived areas of charitable institutions, which the state didn’t replace
The jury system was introduced in the South but the mafia was able to corrupt and intimidate Jurors.
How did a lack of resources affect unity?
The Italian state lacked resources, both financial and human
The South became a drain on the North and Piedmont had neither the resources or manpower to administer the region well.
How did Piedmontisation sweep aside Lombardy, but not Tuscany?
Lombardy had been promised its own legal constitution and it had its own legal system, education system, and local government. These were swept aside by Piedmontisation, introduced by La Marmora with an emergency decree and no debate
In August 1860, Modena, controlled by Farini, voted for annexation, but Tuscany was excluded from this; the powerful Baron Ricasoli was able to retain Tuscan customs and legal systems, at least in the short term
Who were the Brigands, and what initially led to their rise in the South?
Brigands had been bandits that lived in mountains and forests during the Napoleonic wars, seen as protectors of the south.
The collapse of Bourbon rule in the south had left a power vacuum of law and order
What laws did Piedmont introduce which contributed to the rise of Brigandage?
The new government in Italy had increased taxes to pay for the 2.5 bullion Lire debt caused by the war and agents of Francis II (deposed king) were stirring up unrest
Many Bourbon soldiers had also fled to the mountains after the Piedmontese General Cialdini ordered they be shot if found with weapons
Conscription was also introduced, which took young men from their families, where they were needed on farms. In 1861, around 25,000 took to the hills to avoid military service