Components of Memory Flashcards
MEMORY STORAGE MODEL
ATKINSON & SHIFFRIN (1968)
- incoming stimuli -> SM (lost if ignored) + attention = STM/WM (lost if not encoded/rehearsed) + elaborative rehearsal = LTM
- LTM forgetting = retrieval failure/interference/decay theory
- SM = brief/passive/modality buffers ie. iconic/echoic
- STM = only attended items represented; can be operated/initiate action/transferred into LTM; limited capacity; contents decay/displace via new inputs/info retrieval from LTM unless maintained
STM/WM
BADDELEY & HITCH (1974)
- central executive phonological loop/episodic buffer/visuo-spatial sketchpad LTM
LTM
EXPLICIT (DECLARATIVE) - episodic (experienced events) - semantic (knowledge/concepts) IMPLICIT (NON-DECLARATIVE) - procedural (skills/action) - emotional conditioning
WM/LTM INDIVIDUALITY
JAMES (1890)
- introspection = primary VS secondary memory
- computers use temporary work-spaces to keep info analysable/temporarily store unimportant info
PHYSIOLOGY
- info in current neural activity VS changes in synaptic strength
- (MULLER 1900); new info during initial consolidation into LTM; needs protein synthesis
- (FUSTER, 1989); cells in monkey pre-frontal cortex show sustained activation in delayed-response/match-sample tests
WM
- primary/STM/active memory
- arguments for independence: introspection/physiology/consideration of computational utility/experiments on normal subjects/bran damage effects
STM FORGETTING
MURDOCK (1961)
- Brown-Peterson distraction paradigm
- pp reads short 3 word list; tries retention while counting back x3 until cued to recall
- retention interval varies trial-trial; rapidly declines over time then levels; proves 2 memory components
STM FREE RECALL FORGETTING
MURDOCK (1962)
- pp sees/hears a long item sequence
- tries recall; if one asks to recall last items + relatively well remembered = recency effect
STM FORGETTING PATTERNS
SINGLE-TRACE THEORY
- memory trace decays rapidly at start then slows
DUAL-TRACE THEORY
- retrieval after short interval mediated via temporary rapidly decaying memory trace; retrieval after long interval mediated by more permanent memory trace
- supported by:
A) retention over short interval influenced by factors not influencing retention over a long interval
B) retention over long interval influenced by factors that don’t influence retention over short interval
FREE RECALL IMPAIRMENT
MURDOCK (1962)
- the longer the list the fewer items recalled but recency effect is unchanged
GLANZER & CUNITZ (1966)
- faster presentation rate reduces recall of items presented NOT recent items; same for longer ones
- single dissociation consistent w/single memory trace whose decay rate is manipulated
- counting back at end eliminates recency effect but not prob of recall of earlier items
- some earlier items recovered from dif permanent trace
SPERLING’S PARTIAL REPORT SUPERIORITY EFFECT (1960)
- whole array report = poor (3-4 items)
- cued report of a row = good (3-4 items)
- if cued at display offset effect lost -1s; image of all objects briefly outlasts display (iconic)
- pre/post fields dark, advantage lasts -5s
VISUAL WM/CHANGE DETECTION
RENSINCK, O’REGAN & CLARK (1997)
- brief interpolated blank frame produces transients over visual field; attention no longer automatically attracted to change
- only way to detect change is comparing present display w/memory for objects in previous frame
- difficult change detection unless region attended; limited memory for previous objects = change blindness
CHANGE BLINDNESS/TRANSITION FROM ICONIC TO VISUAL WORKING MEMORY (VSTS)
- dif attributes of objects in visual field represented by local activity in multiple visual cortex maps; separate ones for orientation/movement/colour
- activity persists beyond stimulus offset/memory unless overwritten w/new retinal image but not long
- remains available; feature binding by focal attention creates object files in VSTS
- w/o attending object in previous frame; file made it into VSTS; won’t detect change
VISUAL STM VS VISUAL LTM INDEPENDENCE
PHILLIPS & CHRISTIE (1977)
- 8 Phillips checkerboards followed by sequence of test checkers same as/dif to each pattern in 1st sequence but in reverse; pp decides which one
- recency effect = final item much better remembered; eliminated by 5s of mental arithmetic
- most recent complex array seen held in visual STS