Cohort Studies Flashcards
what were the red spot babies
all babies born in may and june 1947 in Newcastle
1142
over first year of life info on hospital visits, health, housing
result: 14% houses unfit for habitation
1625 infections
children followed up annually to 15
90s hypothesis about birth weight and adult CVD
60+ year follow up - wealth of data
what is a cohort
group of people who share a ‘common experience’
what is a cohort study
follows a cohort over a period of time to see how their exposures affect their outcomes
why may a cohort be chosen
they represent the general population, special exposure groups, special resource groups or geographically/facility defined groups
what is the design of a cohort study
identify the cohort, assess exposure, assess outcome and interpret findings
what is the Framingham heart study
1948
study impact of factors on CVD
cohort - defined population 30-62yrs live in Framingham did not have CHD
exposures = BP, weight, diabetes, smoking exercise
outcomes = CHD, stroke, congestive heart failure
evaluated every 2 years
what questions are asked when looking at a cohort study?
does exposure to the risk factor affect chances of developing disease?
so is there more disease in unexposed group or exposed group
what were the milestone findings of the Framingham studies?
1960 - smoking increases risk of heart disease
1961 - cholesterol and Bp increase risk of heart disease
1965 - first report on risk factors for stroke
1974 - diabetes associated with heart disease
what is the UK biobank
cohort study of 500,000 middle aged adults in general population. UK
collect medical lifestyle data and samples
follow cohort participants over time for wide range of diseases
questionnaires
still going
outline the issues with measuring the disease/other outcomes
must be done in the same way for exposed and unexposed groups to avoid INFORMATION BIAS
those assessing outcomes should be blinded to exposure status of the participant - to avoid observer bias
what should be calculated in cohort study to find out if exposure affects chances of getting disease
relative risk and incidence rate
incidence rate separate for exposed and unexposed groups
what are the strengths of cohort studies
clear temporal relationship between exposure and disease
eliminates possibility of recall bias
suitable for studying rare exposures
can study multiple outcomes from single exposure
can study complex interactions between exposures
what can a good cohort provide
answers to questions the original investigators never thought of asking
what are some potential challenges of cohort studies
defining and measuring exposure
defining and measuring disease
loss to follow up over long period
for diseases of long latency , may have to wait many years before first study result
non participation (selection) bias may affect external validity (generalisability) of results
very expensive
time consuming
logistically challenging
what can cohort studies help establish
temporality