coding, capacity, duration of memory✅ Flashcards
what are the 5 studies conducted regarding this?
study 1 = Baddeley - coding in STM + LTM
study 2= Jacobs - capacity if the STM
study 3 = miller - capacity of the STM (7 +- 2)
study 4= Peterson and Peterson - duration of STM
study 5= Bahrick - duration of LTM
1️⃣what did baddeley study?
give some examples
what did he find out?
acoustically similar and dissimilar words
semantically similar and dissimilar words
STM = acoustic similar words had worst recall after 20 mins (acoustic)
LTM = semantically similar words had worse recall after 20 min (semantic)
2️⃣what did Jacobs study?
what happened in the procedure?
what were there findings?
capacity of STM through digit span.
research read 4 digits and increased until the ppt couldn’t recall the order correctly
on average, ppts could recall 9.3 numbers and 7.3 letters incorrect order immediately after pronounced
3️⃣what did miller study?
what did he find out about the span of the STM?
looks at capacity of STM via chunking, suggesting thing happen in 7’s eg 7 days of week
- plus or minus 2 items… chunking = grouping meaningful info together
4️⃣
what did Peterson + Peterson study?
procedure and findings?
- looked at duration of STM suggesting that it lasts for 18 - 30 secs, without maintenance rehearsal.
- 24 ppts were given a consonant syllable and a 3 digit number and counted backwards, recall was around 80% after 3 second interval, with average recall after 18 seconds falling to 3%
5️⃣
what did bahrick at el study? age of ppts?
what were the two tests?
what % pf ppts tested after 48 years were accurate on the photo recognition?
looked at duration of the LTM , ppts of around 17-74,
2 tests:
- recognition test = 50 photos from ppts year books
- free recall test= ppts listed names of those in graduating class
70% but free recall was a lot less
AO3 - baddeley
❌whats a limitation of his study?
❌didn’t use meaningful material.
the words used had no meaning to the ppts so there obviously not gonna want to remember it or associate it with anything.
so the stud as limited application
AO3- jacobs
❌whats a limitation of Jacobs study?
❌the study was conducted along time ago, confounding variables may make it less valid
for example, some ppts may’ve been distracted while the were being tested so they didn’t perform as well as they should have
AO3- miller
❌limitation?
❌overestimated the capacity of the STM, Cowan (2001) concluded that capacity of STM was only 4 chunks, suggesting Miller’s estimate is wrong
AO3- Peterson and Peterson:
❌weakness?
❌used an artificial stimulus, trying to memorise syllables doesn’t reflect daily memory activities where what were remember is meaningful… lack of external validity
AO3 - bahrick et al:
✅ state a strength
❌ weakness?
✅there is high external validity , real life meaningful memories
❌ high attrition rates, ppl doppping out bc its a longitudinal study