Coding, Capacity and Duration: AO3 Flashcards

1
Q

What is a strength of Baddeley’s study?

A
  • P: Strength = clear difference between the two memory stores
  • E: Later research showed that there were some exeptions to Baddeley’s findings
  • E: But the idea that STM uses mostly acoustic coding and LTM uses mostly semantic coding has stood the test of time
  • L: This is an important step in the understanding of the memory system which led to the MSM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is a limitation of Baddeley’s study?

A
  • P: Limitation = artificial stimuli not meaningful stimuli
  • E: Word lists had no personal meaning to PPs. Baddeley’s findings may not tell us much about coding in different kinds of memory tasks
  • E: When processing more meaningful information people may use semantic coding, even for STM tasks
  • L: Findings have limited application
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a strength of Jacob’s study?

A
  • P: Strength = Jacob’s study has been replicated
  • E: Study is very old and early research lacked adequate controls e.g some PPs digit spans might have been underestimated because they were distracted during testing (confounding variable)
  • E: However, it has been confirmed by otheer better controlled studies (Bopp & Verhaeghen (2005))
  • L: Valid test of digit span in STM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a limitation of Miller’s study?

A
  • P: Limitation = it may overestimate STM capacity
  • E: Cowan (2001) reviewed other research
  • E: He concluded that the capacity of STM was only about 4 plus or minus 1 chunks
  • L: Suggests that the lower end of Miller’s estimate (5 items) is more appropraite than 7 items
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is a limitation of Peterson and Peterson’s study?

A
  • P: Limitation = meaningless stimuli
  • E: We can sometimes try to recall meaningless things so the study is not completely irrelevant
  • E: But recall of consonant syllables does not reflect meaningful everyday memory tasks
  • L: Study lacked external validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a strength of Bahrick et al’s study?

A
  • P: Strength = high external validity
  • E: Everyday meaningful memories (e.g of peoples’s faces and names) were studied
  • E: When lab studies were done with meaningless pictures to be remembered, recall rates were lower e.g Shepard (1967)
    L: Bahrick et al’s findings reflect a more “real” estimate of the duration of LTM
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly