Clinical Trials Flashcards

1
Q

Define clinical trial

A

A specialised assay designed to measure therapeutic efficacy and detect adverse effects

Planned experiment involving patients to elucidate most appropriate treatment of future patients with a given medical condition (limited sample, inferences on general population)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Phase 1a

A
  • Exploaratory, safe, tolerability
  • Healthy subjects, single dose - placebo, random, double-blind
  • Adverse events, PK parameters
  • 20-100 subjects
  • 6 months
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Phase 1b

A
  • Exploratory, safety, tolerability
  • Healthy subjects, repeat dose - placebo, random, double-blind
  • Adverse events, PK parameters
  • 20-100 subjects
  • 6 months
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Phase IIa

A
  • Exploratory, safety, efficacy
  • Patients given clinical dose - placebo, random, double-blind
  • Adverse events - PK parameters, efficacy ‘proof-of-concept’
  • 50-200
  • 6 months-2 years
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Phase IIb

A
  • Confirmatory, dose selection
  • Patients given selected dose levels - placebo, random, double-blind
  • Statistical analysis of dose response, confirmation of dose
  • 200-500 subjects
  • 2-3 yrs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Phase III

A
  • Confirmatory, efficacy, safety
  • Patients in target indications - selected dose level, placebo, random, double-blind
  • Statistical measurements demonstrating safety and efficacy
  • 300-3000+
  • 1-4 years
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Phase IV

A
  • Obligatory post marketing surveillance
  • Treated patients
  • Adverse events
  • 10000+
  • 2-4 yrs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

2 important principles underpinning the integrity of the scientific method

A

SIZE

  • The trial must recruit enough patients to obtain a reasonably precise estimate of response on each treatment

AVOIDANCE OF BIAS

  • The selection, ancillary care and evaluation of patients should not differ between treatments, so that the treatment comparison is not affected by factors unrelated to treatments themselves
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Organisation and planning of clinical trials

A

Which patients are eligible

Which treatments are to be evaluated

How each patient’s response is to be assessed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

3 sources of funding for clinical trials

A
  1. Pharmaceutical companies - majority
  2. National Health Organisations - justified for trials of major treatment issues
  3. Locally based trials - no external backing - can provide important source of new therapeutic ideas but many are poorly organised
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Most important regulatory authorities

A
  • Investigational New Drug (IND) for first human studies
  • New Drug Application (NDA) for launching on to the market
  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
  • Health Products Regulatory Authority (HPRA - Ireland)
  • European Medicines Evaluation Agency (EMEA) - mutual recognition
  • Japan insists on clinical trials within Japan
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Randomised control trials problems

A
  • Uncontrolled trials - no direct comparison with a similar group of patients on more standard therapy
  • Historical trials - potential incompatibility with patient selection and patient environment
  • Concurrent non-randomised controls - systematic assignment and judgement assignment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Justification for placebo trials

A

To make patient attitudes to the trial as similar as possible in treatment and control groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define double-blind trials

A

Neither the patient nor those responsible for care and evaluation know which treatment they are receiving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Ethics of double-blind testing

A

Double-blind procedure should not result in any harm or undue risk to a patient

Strong connection between ethics and high scientific and organisational standards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Practicality of double-blind testing

A

It might be impossible in some trials

17
Q

Avoidance of bias with double-blind testing

A

One needs to assess just how serious the bias would be without blinding

18
Q

Compromise with double-blind testing

A

Sometimes partial blinding (e.g. independent blinded evaluators) can be sufficient to reduce bias in treatment comparison

19
Q

How are patients protected in clinical trials

A
  • Respect for persons, the requirement to treat individuals as autonomous agents , and the requirement to protect those with diminished autonomy
  • Beneficence, maximising possible benefits and minimising possible harms
  • Justice, as demonstrated by fairness in distribution of the opportunity to participate in research
20
Q

What should a trial avoid

A
  1. BIAS - exaggeration of benefit of new therapy - too few patients
  2. NOT PUBLISHING THE FINDINGS - publication no matter the outcome furthers medical knowledge
  3. Each trial requires a balance between individual and collective ethics - informed patient consent is essential
21
Q

How is the size of a clinical trial determined

A

Statisitical methods (power calculations) can be used to determine the required number of patients to meet the trial’s principal scientific objectives

22
Q

Advantages of multi-centre trials

A

Patient accrual faster

Any conclusions have a broader more representative base, collaboration should raise standards

23
Q

Disadvantages of multi-centre trials

A

Planning is more complex

Expensive

All must follow the same protocol

Standardised training

A well-organised centre for data essential

Motivation of all participants

24
Q

Critical evaluation of results

A

Check that the conclusion are justified from the results given

Potential for distorting results (trial size, failure to account for all, inappropriate stats methods, confusing presentation of results)

25
Q

Overall conclusion of clinical trials

A

Weighing up the efficacy (therapeutic benefits) and safety (harms) of the treatment

Sufficient evidence to enable reg. authorities to grant licence

Follow up in postmarketing surveillance