Classifying sounds Flashcards
Phonology=
how sounds are organised in a particular language
(more to do with systems/patterns)
phoneme=
minimal contrastive unit
allophone=
phonetically similar, predictable, ways of producing a phoneme
(i.e. /p/ is [pʰ] in <pin>)</pin>
phone=
a speech sound, that does not rely on being classified as a phoneme or allophone
segment=
a minimal chunk of speech (can be phones or morphs)
criteria for phonemes (2)
- must be in CONTRASTIVE distribution (aka sam phonetic contexts)
-demonstrated via minimal pairs (‘den’ ‘then’)
methods of transcribing speech> (4)
- India & Pāṇini
-Quieyun & middle chinese
-Arabic & sibawayh
-Western europe & IPA
India & Pāṇini- what is it?> (5)
- is a systematic minimalistic description of sanskrit grammar (with p/p, semantics), that:
>aimed for oral recital
-provided inspo for ling work in 18th c western europe (IPA)
Quieyun & middle chinese- what is it?>
- Quieyun as a phonological framework for rhyming based on middle chinese
-based on literary dialect of ‘lyoyang & nanjing’ (601CE) - aim to provide a framework so writers could prodcue correct rhymes in literature
India & Pāṇini- features
-consisted of ‘shiva sutras’–> (14) verses which group sanskirt phonemes to roguhly vowels/consoanants/syllables
- had wide ranging lingusitic descriptions
Quieyun & middel chinese- features>
- based around syllable structure and tones
- allows description of chinese lang syllables in terms of ‘initials’ and ‘finals’
- incorporates tone as a fundametnal part of phonology
arabic & sibawayh- what is it?>
-treatise on arabic known as ‘al-Kitāb’ (780CE)
- based on qur’am poetry
-sibaway as L2 speaker of arabic from iran who produced text to assist in learning ‘correct’ Arabic
arabic & sibawayh- features>
consisted of:
-grammar, phonetics & phonology
-concepts similar to phonemes
-descriptions of places of articulation
IPA- what is it?>
- widely used & international description
- aims to represent all sounds in all langs
- origins in western europe
- most suitable for western european langs (OTHER column encompasses a lot of langs> not typologically diverse)
limitations of IPA> (5)
IPA as theoretical model of what is and not relevanrt in speech
>(1)-IPA forces us to choose which bits are relevant (doesnt include socioling info, speech rates, voice quality, pitch)
>(2) is speech discrete? (speech as continuous; overlap but IPA doesnt allow for
>(3) are consonants & vowels really separate? (lots of exceptions ‘syllabic consonants’)
>(4) inaccuracy of link between production with auditory characteristics (i.e. vowel quadrilateral doesnt fully align with tongue; more complex than height, front, rounding)
>(5) suprasegmentals vs ‘segmentals’ (designed from western perspective, not for those with tone for phonology; suprasegmentals are sidelined)