Class 2 Flashcards
Criticisms of the Rorschach
- Lack of good norms
- Overpathologizes
- Low inter-rater reliability
- Lack of relationship to diagnoses
- Lack of incremental validity
- The problem of R
How do you address the critique of “Lack of relationship to diagnoses”
BUT Rorschach is not intended to diagnose
Must consider this indicator by indicator, not rule on the method as a whole
Replication is always an issue in research (but is not the focus of most research)
Better training
How do you address the critique of “Low Inter-rater reliability”
Better graduate training
How do you address the critique of “lack of incremental validity”
Depends on the assessment—add it to a protocol wisely
Better training
Incremental validity: Incremental validity is a type of validity that is used to determine whether a new psychometric assessment will increase the predictive ability beyond that provided by an existing method of assessment
Role of intersubjectivity in the Ror.
Tester’s personality is part of the process
This insight was ahead of its time
Projective Tests Traditionally are….
Projective traditionally refers to:
- ambiguous stimulus or activity
- test-taker generates a response with minimal external guidance
- in responding the test-taker projects or puts forward elements of her personality
- interpretation requires subjectivity
What is projection
Things that aren’t there
Movement probably is a bit projective because blot does not move
Embellishment leaves the field too
- Bats classification answer
- Bat that just went through a storm and is all beat up
Minus responses may be projections (FQ minus?)
Special scores
Projective vs Performance-based
Performance-based tests are nomothetic, that is, one’s performance can be scored into meaningful categories that can be compared to norms, resulting in reliable and valid implications that are totally separate from projective analysis.
AKA there are “right” and “wrong” answers, so you can compare to norms
Performance-based Measures vs self-report
Value as a different method from Self-report tests
What do we miss with self-report tests?
- Maturity?
- Narcissism?
- Intelligence?
- Trauma?
The value of the rorschach
The Rorschach is a standardized behavioral experiment that “provides a sample of how one:
- “filters and organizes information,
- applies meaning to stimuli and situations,
- how conventionally they perceive,
- how logically they think and communicate, and
- how they handle inconsistencies, contradictions, and ambiguity”
“Using normed information one can infer likely behavior in everyday life when the person is left to his or her own devices to understand, represent, and make meaning about complex environmental stimuli that validly can be seen from multiple perspectives”
Rorscach correlation to self-report tests
Rorschach results do not correlate highly with self report measures (e.g., DEPI index with Scale 2 of the MMPI)
Some explain this as failure of the Rorschach. Others call it incremental validity allowed by a different method/level of investigation
Explicit vs implicit and self-report vs performance based
Self-report measures tend to tap explicit aspects of a person (i.e., how a person sees themselves)
Performance-based measures tend to tap implicit or underlying aspects of a person
Similar to intelligence—self-report likely very different from WAIS-IV results (performance-based)
The role of the ‘inkblot” in the rorschach
We cut out the possibility of a correct answer—an inkblot
Thus, we set into motion a complicated set of psychological operations
> Enter it into short term storage, scan it, cognitively identify it, dredge up long-term storage for comparison data, etc.
Critical distal bits
The part of the card that they do intentionality because it gets an answer to be popular
Ex. On card 10: popular response is crab (blue part). When they changed the color to not blue, people didn’t see it. Even with brown they didn’t see crab.
AKA – the most potent properties of the field, they create the parameters that limit the range of possible objects
Distal features of the inkblots are not as precise and discrete as usual
BUT each contains distinctive features that could be identified as similar to objects in memory traces (Rorschach made them that way)
Thus, the blots fall far short of being ambiguous
THIS IS WHAT MAKES IT PERFORMANCE-BASED
The critical bits that limit the array of possible translations allow for rapid formation of potential answers
Popular responses (this is a scoring category)
Popular responses
Each blot has high valence bits that tend to define classification