Chapter 9- Intelligence Flashcards
Intelligence
Set of cognitive skills that includes abstract thinking, reasoning, problem solving, and the ability to acquire knowledge
May be our inherent potential for learning
How fast we are able to learn
The body of knowledge we possess
Different theorists add other components to this definition, but they are not uniformly accepted
Less agreed-on qualities of intelligence
mathematical ability, general knowledge, and creativity
There are two distinct theories of intelligence
1) Intelligence as One General Ability
2) Intelligence as Multiple Abilities
Intelligence as One General Ability
First theory of intelligence developed by Charles Spearman
Human intelligence is a single general capacity or ability
If you’re smart, your smart at everything
Came to this conclusion after research showed that spatial, verbal, perceptual, and quantitative factors of intelligence strongly correlated with each other, suggesting that they were all measuring the same thing
In other words: people who achieve high scores on the verbal section of an intelligence test are also likely to have high scores on the spatial, perceptual, and quantitative sections
Is now known as a g-factor theory
G-factor theory
Spearman’s theory that intelligence is a single general (g) factor made up of specific components
Strongly influenced intelligence test construction for most of the 20th century
Overall intelligence is determined by the person’s specific scores on subtests
Implies that a single number can accurately reflect a person’s intelligence
Illustrated by the question: “How intelligent are you?”
Intelligence as Multiple Abilities
Critics of Spearman’s theory argue that it does not do justice to the complexity of intelligence
Noted that correlations are low enough to say that verbal, quantitative, and other abilities are distinct dimensions of intelligence
Multiple-factor theory of intelligence
Theory that intelligence consists of distinct dimensions and is not just a single factor
Illustrated by the question: “How are you intelligent?”
A single test score cannot accurately reflect a person’s intelligence
Raymond Cattell
developed fluid and crystallized intelligence
Fluid intelligence
The ability to think through a problem one has never confronted before and recognize patterns that may lead to a solution
Raw mental ability, pattern recognition, and abstract reasoning
Examples of things that require fluid intelligence: finding relationships, understanding implications, and drawing conclusions. Speed of reasoning
Not influenced by culture or vocabulary
Less dependent on experience
Measured by Raven’s Progressive Matrices Test
Matrix reasoning
Requires fluid intelligence
Is non-verbal and requires pattern recognition, NOT PRIOR KNOWLEDGE
Is “culture fair” because does not require culturally acquired experience
Crystallized intelligence
Knowledge from experience and learning, education and practice
Influenced by how large one’s vocabulary is as well as knowledge of one’s culture
Dependent upon experience
Ex: Being asked, “Whether Dalmatian is to dog as oriole is to bird”
Language comprehension
The Cattell-Horn-Carroll (CHC) Model of Intelligence
Hierarchical model that integrates the concept of a general intelligence with fluid and crystallized intelligence
States that there are 3 levels of intelligence: general intelligence, broad intelligence, narrow intelligence
General Intelligence
Very similar to Spearman’s g factor: intelligence is one single ability. Is a single general (g) factor made up of specific components
Broad Intelligence
includes abilities such as crystallized and fluid intelligence, as well as memory, learning, and processing speed
Narrow Intelligence
Consists of nearly 70 distinct abilities
Includes specific cognitive, perceptual, and speed tasks used in studies of cognitive ability
Ex: Speed of reasoning and general sequential reasoning for fluid intelligence
Reading, spelling, and language comprehension for crystallized intelligence
Successful intelligence
Radical theory of multiple intelligence proposed by Robert Sternberg and Howard Gardner
Broader view of intelligence than g-factor theory
Skills and cognitive abilities needed to attain success in life
Made up of three interrelated but distinct abilities: analytic, creative, and practical intelligence
Triarchic Theory of Intelligence
Sternberg’s three-part model of intelligence, including analytic, creative, and practical intelligence
Analytic Intelligence
Involves judging, evaluating, or comparing and contrasting information
Resembles academic intelligence that leads to high scores on tests of intelligence
Ex: An analytic problem might require a person to figure out an uncommon word from its content in a sentence, or ask the person to determine the next number in a series of numbers
2) Creative Intelligence
Involves coming up with fresh and useful ideas for solving problems
Is not measured well by traditional measures of intelligence
Ex: A person might be given a number of cartoon images and then be asked to come up with a caption for each
3) Practical Intelligence
The ability to efficiently solve problems of everyday life
Plays a role in knowing how to do one’s job well
Requires street knowledge and skills rather than classroom
“Street smart”, common sense intelligence
Ex: Coming up with three solutions to a real everyday problem they are experiencing in life
Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences Theory
Argues that intelligence is composed of at least 8 distinct capacities
Different people can have different combinations of strengths
1) Linguistic Intelligence
Ability to learn, understand, and use both spoken and written language
Ex: Poets, writers, lawyers, politicians
2) Logical-mathematical intelligence
Ability to analyze information and problems logically and to perform mathematical operations
Ex: Scientists, engineers, accountants
3) Musical intelligence
Ability in performing, composing, or appreciating musical patterns
Ex: Musicians, dancers, songwriters
4) Bodily-kinesthetic intelligence
Ability to use one’s body or parts of it to solve problems or create products
Ex: Athletes, dancers, mechanics, craftspeople
5) Spatial intelligence
Ability to think about and solve problems in three-dimensional space
Ex: Navigators, pilots, architects, sculptors
6) Interpersonal intelligence
Ability to understand and be aware of other people’s intentions, motivations, thoughts, and desires
Also the ability to work well and get along with others
Ability to perceive and understand other people’s intentions, motives, and behaviours
Ex: Psychologists, social workers, teachers, politicians
7) Intrapersonal intelligence
Ability to be aware of, understand, and regulate one’s own behaviour, thoughts, feelings, and motivations
Ex: Psychologists, monks, priests
8) Naturalistic intelligence
Ability to recognize, classify, and understand the plants and animals in one’s environment
Ex: Naturalists, biologists, botanists, veterinarians, hunters, farmers
Opposition against Gardner’s Theories
Psychologists are critical of it: see little value in calling skills like music, movement, and social skills “intelligence”
Gardner hasn’t provided tests of these intelligences
Few direct empirical tests on Gardner’s theory, his ideas are more theory than science
Gardner’s ideas addresses two real problems:
Different students learn in different ways
Some students who have demonstrated ability in some areas fail academic subjects and door poorly on traditional intelligence tests
Early Measures of Intelligence
First Period
1910-1980
People constructed tests around practical and clinical concerns rather than theories and other understandings of intelligence
Second Period
Second Period
1980s
First theory-driven intelligence tests were developed
Third Period
1990s
Major shift
Creators of intelligence tests acknowledged that intelligence may be many things rather than just one
Integrated theory and measurement
Developed intelligence tests that assess several aspects of intelligence
Sir Francis Galton
First person to suggest measuring intelligence
Believed that intelligence was inherited
Wanted to prove that people who were more socially and occupationally successful would perform better on a series on intelligence tests
Set up a laboratory at the 1884 London International Health Exhibition
Measured reaction speed, muscular strength, and sensory acuity
Though big heads meant bigger brains
Performance on his measures wasn’t related to social and occupational success
Generated interest in testing mental abilities, but unsuccessful in developing a useful measure of intelligence