Chapter -8 Higher Level Thinking Flashcards
Higher level thinking
Higher order thinking refers to a more advanced level of thoughts than that used to acquire factual knowledge.
7 major forms of higher level thinking
Analysis ( analytical thinking)- Breaking down information to identify it’s essential parts and underlying elements.
7 major forms of higher level thinking
Synthesis [integrative thinking)- breaking up ideas by connecting them to form a larger whole or more comprehensive system
7 major forms of higher level thinking
Application or applied thinking- putting thinking into practice to solve problems and resolve issues
7 major forms of higher level thinking
Multidimensional thinking – viewing issues from a variety of vantage points to gain a more complete or comprehensive perspective It includes: Perspective of person ( self) Perspective of place Perspective of time Perspective of culture.
7 major forms of higher level thinking
Balanced thinking – carefully considering arguments for and against a particular position or viewpoint
7 major forms of higher level thinking
Critical thinking or evaluation – judging the quality of arguments, conclusions and thought processes – including all forms of thinking on this list
7 major forms of higher level thinking
Creative thinking – generating ideas that are unique, original or distinctively different
Definitive evidence
So strong or compelling that a definite conclusion should be reached.
Suggestive evidence
Strong enough to suggest that a tentative or possible conclusion may be reached.
Inconclusive evidence
Too weak to reach any conclusion.
Standards for evaluating ideas or arguments ( critical thinking)
Validity- truthfulness. Is it true or accurate?
Morality- ethics. Is it fair or just?
Beauty- aesthetics. Does it have artistic merit or value?
Practicality- usefulness. Can it be put to use for practical or beneficial purpose?
Priority- order of importance or effectiveness. Is it better than other ideas and alternative courses of action?
2 major ways in which we use inferential reasoning to make Armand reach conclusions are
Logical reasoning Citing empirical ( observable) evidence .
Logical reasoning
Reaching a conclusion by showing that it logically follows from or is logically consistent with an established premise.
Example: if statement A is true , then it can be concluded that statement B is also true.
empirical ( observable) evidence .
Reaching a conclusion by showing that it is supported by statistical data or scientific research findings.
Example: based on evidence A, it can be concluded that B is true.
Logical fallacies
Inferential reasoning errors.
Major types of logical fallacies
Non sequitur- drawing a conclusion that doesn’t follow form Or connect with the premise -initial statement or observation