Chapter 8 Flashcards
What groups need is an institutionalized procedure that ensures that decision making optimizes creativity and potential innovation.what is one way this can be done
constructive controversy
what is the nature of controversy
…
definition, decisions involve conflict, why
as several alternative courses of action are identified and considered before agreement is reached.
T: the conflict that arises when one person’s ideas, information, conclusions, theories, and opinions are incompatible with those of another person, and the two seek to reach an agreement
controversy
how are controversies solved
diliberate discourse
T: the discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of proposed actions
deliberate discourse
5 steps for managing controversy ?
research and prepare a position
- present and advocate the position
- open discussion
- reverse perspectives
- reach a group decision through consensus
Each alternative course of action is assigned to a two-person advocacy team T
researching a prepared position
go over figure 8.1
…
T: occurs when members of a group inhibit discussion to avoid any disagreement or arguments, emphasize agreement, and avoid realistic appraisal of alternative ideas and courses of action
concurring seeking
what method are most group decisions based on
concurring seeking
T: members of a decision-making group set aside their doubts and misgivings about whatever policy is favored by the emerging consensus to be able to concur with the other members
group think (similar to concurrence seeking)
exists when two or more individuals argue positions that are incompatible with one another and a judge declares a winner on the basis of who presented their position the best:T
debate
T: occurs when isolated individuals independently decide on a course of action without talking with one another
individualistic decision making
T: can be defined as differences in opinion or conclusion, especially from the majority
dissent (often results in arg)
T: is a thesis statement or claim supported by at least one reason
argument
T: a social process in which two or more individuals engage in a dialogue where arguments are constructed, presented, and critiqued
arguing
2 types of arguments
collaborative and adversarial
4 main ways to make a decision
controversy, debate, concurring seeking, individualistic
review table 8.2
..
Decisions are by their very nature controversial
t
theory of constructive controversy: what are the 2 ends of the continuum of how you can structure decision making
constructive controversy and concurrence seeking
6 steps in the process of controversy
figure 8.2
2 outcomes of controversy
productivity and positive attitudes
T: An individual’s mental interpretation of a situation based on his or her knowledge, understanding, and experiences.
cognitive perpective
what is step 1 in process of cog controversy
Organizing Information and Deriving Conclusions
step 2?
presenting and advocating positions
T: occurs when an individual presents a position and provides reasons why others should adopt it.
advocacy
Individuals’ commitment to decrease the more they have to advocate for it
f their position tends to increase as they advocate it. = freeze in epistemic process
step 3?
Being Challenged by Opposing Views
which step unfreezes the epistemic process
being challenged
what steps freeze the epistemic process
1 and 2
what is step 4
Conceptual Conflict and Uncertainty
The greater the number of people disagreeing with a person’s position, the more … the context of the controversy.
competitive
what is step 5
Epistemic Curiosity and Perspective Taking
T: An active search for more information in hope of resolving the uncertainty caused by conceptual conflict.
epistemic curiosity
which step is epistemic curiosity triggers
5 to response uncertainty
Indices of epistemic curiosity in an individual include actively …3
(a) searching for more information, (b) seeking to understand opposing positions and rationales, and (c) attempting to view the situation from opposing perspectives.
what is step 6
Reconceptualization, Synthesis, and Integration
T: occurs when individuals integrate a number of different ideas and facts into a single position.
synthesis
T: knowledge is available only in degrees of certainty
probabilistic
T: there is only right and wrong and authority should not be questioned
dualistic
T: authorities are seen as sometimes right, but right and wrong depend on your perspective
relativistic
what kind of thinking do you need for synthesis
probabilistic
6 steps of concurrence
- dominant position derived
- The Dominant Position Is Presented and Advocated
- Being Confronted with the Demand to Concur and Conform
- Conflict Between Public and Private Positions
- Seeking Confirming Information
- public consensus
how do controversy and concurrence seeking compare
tabel 8.3
Group decision making often goes wrong because …3`
alternatives are not considered carefully, minority opinions are silenced, and disagreement among members’ conclusions is suppressed.
controversy promotes what 5 things
high productivity and quality of decision making, creativity, task involvement, positive interpersonal relationships, and psychological health
3 benefits of constructive controversy
- greater recall of reasoning behind positions
- more transference
- more generalizing to wider variety of situations
is dissent good for groups
increase overall group preformance = deeper understanding of task
Can the advocacy of two conflicting but wrong solutions to a problem create a correct one?
yes through qua
T:A conflict not only cognitively motivating, but also one in which the resolution of the conflict is likely to be in the direction of correct performance.
qua
Presenting immature children with … that conflicts with their initial position has been found to promote some cognitive growth, although not as much growth as when they receive correct information
erroneous information
The value of the controversy process lies not so much in the … of an opposing position as in the attention and thought processes it induces
correctness (aim for 2)
how does controversy promote creativity 2
- view from Dif perspective
2. reformat to new orientation of a solution
what aids good argumentation= production
heterogeneity
the connection between controversy and … is so strong
creativity
did controversy ever lead the correct position to be dropped for the erroneous one
Change tended to be unidirectional and nonreversible. Children who understood conservation did not adopt erroneous strategies