Chapter 7: Group Influence Flashcards
Group
Two or more people who interact with and influence on another
All groups have one thing in common: their members interact
Perceive an us vs them
Mere Presence
People are not competing, do not reward or punish, do nothing except be present as a passive audience or co-actors
Bikers go faster when in group than alone (when competing)
Children wind string faster in the presence of others doing the same task
Presence of others improves accuracy of simple motor tasks
Makes us better at recognizing faces
Social facilitation effect in animals
Presence of same species helps performance (e.g. Ants excavate more sand, Chickens eat more grain)
Presence of same species hinders performance (e.g. Cockroaches, parakeets, green finches learn maze more slowly with others there)
Presence of others can hinder performance
Diminishes efficiency at learning nonsense syllables, completing a maze, performing complex multiplication problems
Can even be worse at learning new faces
Role of arousal in response
Arousal enhances dominant response tendency
Arousal & Simple Tasks
Increased arousal enhances performance on easy tasks for which the most likely dominant response is correct
Overlearned, instinctual, automatized, require no resources
E.g. easy anagrams, quicker to learn short maze
Arousal & Complex Tasks
Increased arousal promotes incorrect responding when answer is not dominant
E.g. hard anagrams, take longer to learn difficult mazes
Novel, learned, controlled, require cognitive resources
Presence of many others
Crowding
Crowds intensify positive or negative reactions
Arousal and self conscious attention created by audience can interfere with well learned and automatic behaviours such as speaking
Effect of others’ presence increases with their number
Even supportive audience may elicit poorer performance on challenging tasks
Evaluation Apprehension
Observers make us apprehensive because we wonder how they are evaluating us
Enhancement of dominant responses is strongest when people think they are being evaluated
Social Loafing
Group members may be less motivated when completing additive tasks
People in tug of war line pull less when in a group and more when alone
People think they put in full effort with group even though didn’t
Reducing Social Loafing
Groups loaf less when members are friends or are identified with or indispensable to their group
People loaf less if the task is challenging, appealing, or involving
If goal is very compelling maximum output from everyone is essential
Using rewards based on effort
Evaluating each member alone
Deindividuation
When arousal and diffused responsibility combine and normal inhibitions diminish
Occurs in group situations that foster anonymity and draw attention away from the individual
Lessening of restraint
Impulsive self gratification
Destructive social explosions
Counteracting Deindividuation
Increase self awareness (e.g. mirrors, name tags, individualized clothing, decrease alcohol)
Group Polarization
Groups enhance initial inclination
Groups come to more extreme decisions than individuals
Groupthink
Tendency of decision making groups to suppress dissent in the interest of group harmony (big groups make bad decisions)
Lead group members to overestimate their group’s might and right
Group members become close minded
Group suffers from pressures toward uniformity