Chapter 7 Flashcards
IC is about:
contingencies (If R, then O)
(however contingencies change)
can contingencies change?
YES
Discriminative stimulus (S):
tells us which contingencies are in effect
- if S, then R –> O
-If no S, then R does nothing
IC is really a _ association
IC is really a three-part association
What are the three parts associations in IC:
- context / discriminative stimulus, S
- behavioural response, R
-outcome, O
The associative structure of instrumental conditioning originated with:
Thorndike
Do pavlovian mechanisms play a role in instrumental conditioning?
yes
What is thorndike’s law of effect (S-R learning):
If a response in the presence of a stimulus results in a satisfying event then the S-R association is strengthened
If the response is followed by an annoying event then the S-R association is weakened
S =
the context (Stimuli)
How important are discriminative stimuli in instrumental conditioning?
they are crucial
R=
the instrumental response
O=
The response outcome
In Thorndike’s law of effect (S-R) learning, the reinforcer (O) serves to:
“stamp in” the S-R association
How is Thorndike’s law of effect motivation for instrumental behaviour?
Activation of the S-R association upon exposure to contextual stimuli (S), in the presence of which the response was previously reinforced
In thorndike’s law of effect : S-R learning, there is no learning about:
“o” or “S-O” or “R-O”
The earliest two process theory was proposed by:
Hull and Spence
reward expectency :
S-O
What was the early two process theory proposed by Hull and Spence?
Two factors motivate the instrumental response:
A) S-R Association
–>The stimulus comes to evoke the response directly
B) S-O Association
–> Response is motivated by the expectancy of reward
Two factors INFLUENCE each other (we know today that this is not true)
The modern two-process theory was proposed by:
Rescorla and Black
What is the modern two-process theory about?
(1) S-O association (Pavlovian Learning)
(2) Conditioned, central emotional state (positive or negative based on the reinforcer)
(3) Response
PIT test: how can we test the idea that pavlovian conditioned emotions motivate instrumental behaviour?
Manipulating the expectancy should change response rate
IC is about :
contingencies ( if R then O)
( contingencies change)
IC is really a __ association
Three part :
-context (discriminative stimulus)–> S
- Behavioural response –> R
- Outcome, O
__ are crucial in Instrumental conditioning
Discriminative stimuli
What motivates instrumental behaviour?
In Thorndike’s law of effect, the reinforcer “o” serves to:
“stamp in” the S-R association
In thorndike’s law of effect there is no learning about:
“O” or “s-o” or “R-O”
What is the PIT test comprised of?
three phases
Phase 1 : instrumental conditioning
Phase 2: Pavlovian Conditioning
(Phase 1 and Phase 2 can be interchanged)
Phase 3: Present Pavlovian CS during performance of instrumental response
ex : Lever press –>
Food w/ tone vs food w/ no tone
In the pavlovian instrumental transfer test, the positive emotional state generated by the appetitive CS :
summates with the appetitive motivatin that is involved in pressing the lever to obtain food
__ and __ activity associated with PIT
AMYGDALA and VENTRAL STRIATUM activity associated with PIT
In regards to specific reward expectency: summation occurs when?
summation occurs only when organism expects same outcome
Do R-O associations exist?
yes
How were R-O associations proven/demosntrated
Using instrumental devaluation
Who used instrumental devaluation to prove that R-O associations exist?
Colwill and Rescorla
Describe the process of instrumental devaluation
- Instrumental training: rats trained to push rod left or right for food or sucrose on VI 1-min schedule
- Devaluation of the reward: for some animals the food, for others the sucrose, was paired with LiCl (conditioned aversion). Rod was ABSENT
- Rod places back into the chamber, Instrumental responding was examined in the absence of any reinforcement
What motivates instrumental behaviour?
- Associative structure of instrumental conditioning
- Response allocation
Associative structure of instrumental conditioning: S activates:
- S activates R
-S also activates the R-O association
Response allocation has a __ view
molar
What do we mean by molar view:
Molar view: how performing one response limits other activities/ redistributes activities
What was Thorndike’s definition of a reinforcer?
A stimulus that produces a satisfying state of affairs
What was Skinner’s definition of a reinforcer:
A stimulus or outcome that increases the response that caused the stimulus to become available
What is wrong with Skinner and Thorndikes definition of a reinforcer:
-These are valuable definitions, but NOT theories of reinforcement
- they describe a relationship between a behaviour and a consequence
-do not let us predict what “things” will be in reinforcers
“they do not let us predict if certain “things” will serve as reinforcers in different situations
What was Sheffield’s definition of a reinforcer:
Reinforcers are species-specific consummatory responses
First time that reinforcers were considered to be anything other than “stimuli”;
Consummatory Response Theory (Scheffield)
Describe the consummatory response theory:
Many reinforcers, such as food and water, elicit species-typical uncondi- tioned responses, such as chewing, licking, and swallowing. The consummatory-response theory attributes reinforcement to these species-typical behaviors. It asserts that species- typical consummatory responses (eating, drinking, and the like) are themselves the critical feature of reinforcers. In support of this idea, Sheffield, Roby, and Campbell (1954) showed that saccharin, an artificial sweetener, can serve as an effective reinforcer, even though it has no nutritive value and hence cannot satisfy a biological need.
The Premack Principle
Reinforcers are high probability responses
According to the premack principle, difference in __ is critical for reinforcement
acccording to the premack principle, difference in RESPONSE PROBABILITY is critical for reinforcement