Chapter 6 Flashcards
Three ways to reduce cognitive dissonance:
- By changing our behavior to bring it in line with the dissonant cognition.
- By attempting to justify our behavior through changing one of the dissonant cognitions.
- By attempting to justify our behavior by adding new cognitions.
Cognitive dissonance
When confronted with information implying that we may have behaved in ways that are irrational, immoral, or stupid - we experience discomfort.
Impact Bias
The tendency to overestimate the intensity and duration of our emotional reactions to future negative events.
Self affirmation
distortions aimed at protecting one’s self-image
Post Decision Dissonance
Dissonance aroused after making a decision, typically reduced by enhancing the attractiveness of the chosen alternative
Lowballing
Salesperson induces a customer to agree to purchase a product at a very low cost and subsequently claims it was an error and then raises the price
Justification of Effort
The tendency for individuals to increase their liking for something they have worked hard to attain
External Justification
A reason or an explanation for dissonant personal behavior that resides outside the individual
(e.g. in order to receive a large reward or avoid a severe punishment)
Internal Justification
The reduction of dissonance by changing something about oneself (attitude or behavior)
Counterattitudial Advocacy
Stating an option or attitude that runs counter to one’s private belief or attitude
When someone publicly advocates something that is counter to what they believe or how they actually behave, it arouses dissonance.
Insufficient Punishment
The dissonance aroused when individuals lack sufficient external justification for having resisted a desired activity or object, usually resulting in individuals devaluing the forbidden activity or punishment
The less severe you make the threat of punishment, the less external justification there is; the less external justification, the greater the need for internal justification.
Self-Persuation
A long-lasting form of attitude change that results from attempts at self-justification
Hypocrisy induction
a method of making people face the difference between what they say and what they do.
It takes advantage of the need to reduce dissonance to foster socially beneficial behaviors.