chapter 5 - social measurement Flashcards

1
Q

measurement

A

careful, deliberate observations of the real world for the purpose of describing objects and events in terms of the attributes composing a variable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

direct observables

A

things we can observe rather simply and directly (colour of apple)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

indirect observables

A

requires relatively more subtle, complex, or indirect observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

constructs

A

theoretical creations that are based on observations but that cannot be observed directly or indirectly (IQ)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

reification

A

regarding constructs as real but constructs aren’t actually real they are just useful to make sense of things

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

conceptualization

A

mental process whereby fuzzy and imprecise notions are made more specific and precise; gives definite meaning to a concept by specifying one or more indicators of what we have in mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

indicator

A

sign of the presence or absence of the concept we’re studying ;observation that we choose to consider as a reflection of a variable we wish to study (giving food to homeless is an indicator of compassion?)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

dimension

A

a specifiable aspect of a concept, making groups (economic dimension of compassion, social, political dimension)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

interchangeability of indicators

A

if several different indicators all present to some degree the same concept, then all of them will behave the same way that the concept would behave if it were real and could be observed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

real definition (reification)

A

not a stipulation determining the meaning of some expression but a statement of the ‘essential nature’ or the ‘essential attributes’ of some entity (mistakes construct for a real enitity)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

nominal definition

A

simply assigned to a term without any claim that the definition represents a ‘real’ entitity (arbitrary)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

operational definition

A

specifies precisely how a concept will be measured the operations we choose to perform (achieves maximum clarity about what a concept means in the context of a given study)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

measurement steps

A
  1. conceptualization; what are different meanings
  2. nominal definition; we define as:
  3. operational definition; how do you measure
  4. measurements in the real world; real life
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

variable 2 qualities

A
  • attributes composing variable should be exhaustive; must be able to classify every observation in terms of one of the attributes composing the variable
    -mutually exclusive; must be able to classify every observation in terms of one and only one attribute
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

choices of operationalization

A

-range of variation
-variations between the extremes; degree of precision, how fine will you make distinctions among the various possible attributes composing a give variable
-a note on dimensions; which dimension of a variable interested in
-defining variables and attributes, attribute: characteristic or quality of something, variable: logical sets of attributes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

levels measurement

A

-nominal
-ordinal
-interval
-ratio

17
Q

nominal

A

variables whose attributes have only the characteristics of exhaustiveness and mutual exclusiveness (sex, religious, political party) only offers names or labels

18
Q

ordinal

A

variables with attributes we can logically rank-order (education, high-medium-low)

19
Q

interval

A

describing a variable whose attributes are rank ordered and have equal distances between adjacent attributes, no true zero point (IQ-test, temperature)

20
Q

ratio (highest level)

A

attributes composing a variable, besides having all the structural characteristics mentioned previously, are based on a true zero point (age, weight)

21
Q

reliability

A

whether a particular technique, applied repeatedly to the same object, yields the same results each time: test-retest, split-half, established measures, research workers

22
Q

test-retest method

A

make the same measurement more than once; you must get the same response if you did it right the first round

23
Q

split-half method

A

using two sets to measure something; should give the same results because interchangeability of indicators

24
Q

established measures

A

getting information from people is to use measures that have proved their reliability in previous research

25
Q

validity

A

the extent to which an empirical measure adequately reflects the real meaning of the concept under consideration; are we actually measuring what we say we are measuring: face-, criterion-related -, construct-, content validity

26
Q

face validity

A

that quality of an indicator that makes it seem a reasonable measure of some variable (the frequency of going to church is a reasonable indicator of religiosity)

27
Q

criterion-related validity

A

predictive validity; the degree to which a measure relates to some external criterion (drivers’ license test is determined by the scores people get and the subsequent driving records, driving records is the criteria)

28
Q

construct validity

A

the degree to which a measure relates to other variables (construct) as expected within a system of theoretical relationships (logical relationships)

29
Q

content validity

A

the degree to which a measure covers the range of meaning included within a concept

30
Q

“interest in quality newspapers” How many days a week did you read a quality newspaper in 2010?

A

not reliable, too long ago

31
Q

how many days a week do you read a newspaper

A

not valid; not perse ‘quality’ newspapers

32
Q

how many hours have you spent reading a quality newspaper yesterday?

A

not reliable; only one day -> not reading by coincidence?

33
Q

solutions validity

A

-give definitions
-complex concepts (constructs) -> try to cover all dimensions
-compare to other ‘objective’ evidence

34
Q

solution reliability

A

-more than one question / observation
-similar circumstances

35
Q
A