Chapter 5: Operant Conditioning Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

outcomes are ________ of an animal’s behaviour

A

consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why is instrumental behaviour emitted?

A

Because it is effective in producing a particular consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Operant conditioning?

A

a response defined by the effect it produces in the environment (goal- directed)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

E. L. Thorndike

A

Puzzle box
– Hungry animal placed in box
– Food visible to animal
– Measured how long it took to escape the box on successive trials

Thorndike measured latency to get out of box on successive trials

Law of effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Law of effect

A

Responses in presence of stimulus followed by satisfying events
will strengthen the association between the S and R;
If response followed by annoying event, association is weakened

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Standard tasks for examining instrumental behaviour: Discrete trial procedure

A

– Instrumental response produced once per trial
– Each training trial ends with removal of the animal from the apparatus

ex. Operant Devices
Mazes
Inspired by observing animals in nature (burrows of rats)
measure: Running speed, Latency, Correct choices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Standard tasks for examining instrumental behaviour: Free-operant procedure

A

– Animals remain in apparatus and can make many responses
– No intervention by the experimenter
– Developed by BF Skinner
– Need a unit to measure behaviour:
•Operant response: defined by the effect that the response produces on the environment
– Response rates are often the behavioural measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Standard tasks for examining instrumental behaviour: Magazine training

A

– How you establish the operant response
– Animal must be shown how to “use” the experimental set up
– You need a series of training steps
– Involves classical conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Examining instrumental behaviour

• Shaping

A
– Sequence of training steps
1) Light always occurs with
food delivery 
2) Light and tone occur
with food delivery 
3) Tone occurs with food
delivery
• Light does not occur
anymore

shaping takes advantage of response variability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Burrhus Frederick Skinner

A

shaping a pigeon to turn

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Response Variability

A

Behaviour starts off highly variable
Successful variations are maintained;
unsuccessful variations are not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

appetitive stimulus

A

pleasant outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

aversive stimulus

A

unpleasant outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

instrumental responses can

A

result in a stimulus

turn off a stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Reinforcer

A

Reinforcer : An event that follows behaviour,

and that behaviour increases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Punisher:

A

Punisher: An event that follows behaviour,

and that behaviour decreases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Reinforcement:

A

increases responding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Punishment

A

decreases responding

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

positive

A

add something (appetitive or aversive)

20
Q

negative

A

remove something (appetitive or aversive)

21
Q

positive punishment

A

response-outcome contingency: response produces an aversive stimulus

result: decrease in response rate

22
Q

positive reinforcement

A

response-outcome contingency: response produces an appetitive stimulus
Result: incerase in response rate

23
Q

Negative reinforcement

A

response-outcome contingency: eliminates or prevents the occurrence of an aversive stimulus
result: increase in response rate

24
Q

Negatove punishment

A

omission training

response-outcome contingency: response eliminates or prevents the occurrence of an appetitive stimulus

result: decrease in response rate

25
Q

Omission training (DRO treatment) for Self-Injurious Behaviour

A

Reinforced with attention when not performing self-injurious behaviour

26
Q

Reinforcer vs. Punisher is all based on the __________

A

Reinforcer vs. Punisher is all based on the

target behaviour

27
Q

Instrumental Conditioning: The Players

A
  1. Instrumental response
  2. Outcome of response (reinforcer)
  3. Response-reinforcer relation
28
Q

Instrumental response

A

• Thorndike “stamping in” of S-R association
• Skinner “reinforcement” or strengthening of
behaviour
• Language suggests that instrumental conditioning results in necessarily stereotyped behaviours
• Led to studies of Response Variability

29
Q

Response Variability

Method:

A

– Pigeons in operant chamber
– Peck two response keys a total of 8 times
– No restriction on distribution of pecks between the two keys
– BUT, pattern of left/right pecks on a given trial had to be different that on the previous 50 trials
– Only “novel” patterns reinforced

Summary:
• Response variability can be increased by
reinforcement
• In absence of reinforcing variability in responses, responding becomes more stereotyped

30
Q

Relevance or Belongingness

A

Relevance or Belongingness
• Remember bright-noisy/water Classical
Conditioning experiment with rats?
– (taste with sickness, audiovisual with pain)

• Belongingness - Proposed by Thorndike
– Evolutionary history makes certain responses belong
with certain reinforcers
– Pawing at door vs. yawning

31
Q

The outcome or reinforcer

A

• (1) Quality and quantity
• (2) Previous experience with other reinforcers
(shift in quality or quantity)
– Similar to R-W
• Larger than expected reinforcer (or US) supports excitatory conditioning
• Smaller than expected reinforcer (or US) supports inhibitory conditioning

32
Q

Manipulation of Quality vs. Quantity

A

• Independent groups of rats given flavoured water
reinforcement • More responses when reward is greater in quantity
and/or quality

33
Q

Response-reinforcer relation

A

Temporal relation

Causal relation

34
Q

Temporal relation

A

Time between response and
outcome
– Reinforcement is most effective if it happens
immediately after the target response

35
Q

Causal relation

A

The extent to which the response
is necessary and sufficient for the occurrence of the reinforcer
– Reinforcement is most effective if it only happens afterthe target response

36
Q

Effects of Temporal Contiguity

A
  • Immediate reinforcement preferred
  • Delays over 0.5 s can hinder performance
  • Recent research suggests: can use delays up to 30 s
37
Q

Effects of Delayed Reinforcement

A

Delay between response and food reinforcement in rats

No learning in 64-sec delay condition

38
Q

How to overcome delay in reinforcement?

A
  1. Conditioned (secondary) reinforcer

2. Marking procedure

39
Q

Conditioned (secondary) reinforcer

A

A stimulus that becomes an
effective reinforcer because of its association with a primary or unconditioned reinforcer (e.g., food)
helps overcome delay in reinforcement

40
Q

Marking procedure

A

Instrumental response is immediately followed by a distinctive event that makes the instrumental response more memorable

helps overcome delay in reinforcement

41
Q

Response–reinforcer contingency:

A

The relation of a response to a reinforcer
defined in terms of the probability of getting
reinforced for making the response as
compared to the probability of getting
reinforced in the absence of the response

42
Q

Skinner’s Superstition Experiment

A

Pigeons trained with temporal-contingent

reinforcement exhibit “superstitious” behaviours

43
Q

Behavioural Momentum

A

More than just response rates, reinforcers
strengthen the tendency to persist in
behaviour

44
Q

Reinforcers: primary vs. secondary

A

Primary: US
Secondary: CS (i.e. money)

45
Q

Reinforcers: intrinsic vs. extrinsic

A

inside

outside (i.e money)