Chapter 10: Aversive control Flashcards
Positive punishment
behaviour decreases due to the presentation of consequences
negative punishment
behaviour decreases due to removal of consequences
- time out
- response cost
negative reinforcement
- behaviour increases due to the removal of consequences (escape or avoid punisher)
punishment is not equal to _______
retribution
behavioural punishment should not be _____
vindictive
time out
removal of reinforcers or availability of reinforcers
- short usually better
- negative punishment
point loss experiment
lever press responding of college students reinforced on a variable interval schedule w/ points that could be exchanged for money
during baseline phase, only S^D was presented (discriminative stimulus)
During next phase, S^D present in alternation with a punishment stimulus (S^Dp), during which the VI schedule remained in effect but each response was also punished by point loss
decrease in responding during SDp
key features of aversive stimuli
most research done with shock
- easy to control amount
- simple setup
- consistently aversive w/o damage
- uncomfortable (usually not very painful)
- only used when necessary
punisher intensity
stronger punisher will produce greater decreases in behaviour
- ceiling effect
- importance of appropriate level
- punisher should STOP behaviour when it occurs
- do not start low and “ramp up”
Contingent vs. independent aversive stimulation
Aversive stimulation contingent on an instrumental response is more effective in suppressing that response than delivering aversive stimulation independent of behaviour
delayed punishment
small delays lead to huge decreases in punishment value
- contingency
- contiguity
reinforcement considerations
most behaviours occur bc they are reinforced or reinforcing
- generally need to remove reinforcer
- avoid aversives that are actually reinforcing
- allow for alternative behaviour to produce reinforcement
- reduce motivation for bad reinforcement
punishment is most effective when an _______ response is available
alternative
sensitivity to the reinforcer: cocaine addicted rats
- cocaine addicted rats sought cocaine despite punishment
- not true for sucrose
thorndike and the negative law of effect
just as reinforcement strengthens behaviour, punishment weakens behaviour
Conditioned emotional responses: theory of punishment (Estes)
- punishment suppresses behaviour
- stimuli/behaviours just before punishment = CSs
- these stimuli elicit freezing
- explains many (not all) punishment effects
Avoidance of punishment (Dinsmoor)
- punishment as a form of avoidance behaviour
- stimuli that accompany the punished response bc aversive
- animals avoid these stimuli by doing something besides the punished behaviour
Premark principle of punishment
- with total freedom, diff behaviours have diff probabilities of occurring
- premack principle:
H = high prob. response, L = low prob. response - if L allows H, reinforces L
If H forces L, punishes H