Chapter 5: Legal Issues with Policing Flashcards
1
Q
3 Due Process Areas Most Relevant to Policing
A
- Search and Seizure (Evidence and Investigation)
- Arrest
- Interrogation
2
Q
Exclusionary Rule
A
- Prevents (excludes) evidence that is unlawfully obtained from being admitted and used in a court of law
3
Q
Mapp vs. Ohio (1961)
A
- Expanded the exclusionary rule to the state level
4
Q
2 Purposes behind the Exclusionary Rule
A
- Exclusion of evidence obtained in violation of a defendant’s constitutional rights will act as a deterrent to police misconduct
- The integrity of the judicial system requires that the courts not be made party to lawless invasions of the constitutional rights of citizens
5
Q
Good Faith Exception
A
- Holds that the exclusionary rule does not bar evidence that was obtained by police officers acting in good faith with objectively reasonable reliance on a search warrant issued by a proper magistrate but ultimately found to be unsupported by probable cause
6
Q
Independent Source Exception
A
- Allows evidence to be admitted in court if knowledge of the evidence is gained from a separate, or independent source that is completely unrelated to the illegality at hand.
7
Q
Inevitable Discovery Exception
A
- Allows evidence of illegally seized items that would have been discovered anyway
- Allows evidence to be admitted, even though it was seized in violation of the Constitution
8
Q
Frisk
A
- Patting down of the outer clothing of a suspect based upon reasonable suspicion, designed to protect a police officer from attack with a weapon while questioning a suspect
- A frisk is limited to the outer clothing while a search is a full-blown investigation
9
Q
Reasonable Suspicion
A
- Legal term that refers to a police officer’s suspicion that a person has recently committed a crime, in the process of committing a crime, or is soon going to commit a crime.
- This suspicion has to be justified based on the reasonable person standard. What would a reasonable person do in this situation?
10
Q
Probable Cause to Arrest
A
- Two conclusions must be justified by substantial and trustworthy evidence.
1. That a violation of the law has been committed
2. That the person to be arrested has committed the violation
11
Q
Probable Cause to Search
A
- Two conclusions must be justified by substantial and trustworthy evidence.
1. That the specific items to be searched for are connected with criminal activity
2. That these items will be found in the place to be searched
12
Q
3 requirements to allow a seizure under Plain View
A
- Officer must be legally on the premises or at the place from which the item is plainly viewed.
- The incriminating nature of the item seized must be immediately apparent.
- Officer must have a lawful right of access to the object itself.
13
Q
Police Interrogation and Confessions
A
- Confession can only be used if it was
1. Voluntary (not the product of coercion by police)
2. In conformity with the Miranda ruling
14
Q
Two Elements Required for Miranda Warnings
A
- Custodial
- Interrogation
- These two elements have to be occurring in the same place at the same time. Remove one and there is no legal requirement for Miranda warnings.
15
Q
Arrest
A
An arrest occurs whenever a law enforcement officer, under legal authority, restricts a person’s freedom of movement or freedom to leave.