Chapter 4 - Agency Flashcards

1
Q

Does the agent require full contractual capacity

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Does the principal require full contractual capacity

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

T/F
Agency can be created orally or in writing

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the exception to agency being created orally or in writing

A

if agent is to execute deed on principal’s behalf, then agency must be created by deed (agend given POA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In commercial transactions how is it usual to appoint an agent

A

in writing - not essentail

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

When does agency by estoppel arise

A

when words/conduct of principal give third party the impression that the person who purports to contract is an agent of the principal
third party as a result acts upon this

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

T/F
Agency by estoppel can only arise where the conduct of the apparent principal creates it

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

T/F
Agency does not arise by estoppel if it is the agent who holds themselves out as agent, not the principal

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When does agency of necessity arise?

A

Where a person is faced with an emergency in which the property/interests of another person are in imminent jeopardy and in order to preserve that property/those interests, it becomes necessary to act for that person without authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Agent seeking to bind a principal on grounds of agency by necessity must show that

A
  • agent had no practical way to contact principal
  • actions arose from pressing need for action
  • acted in good faith in interest of principal
  • action was reasonable and prudent in the circumstances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Sachs v Miklos 1948

A

M agreed to store S furniture, after time, M needed storage space. Couldn’t trace S so sold furniture, M pleaded agency of necessity
Held no agency of necessity since no emergency and furniture sold for own convenience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

T/F
ratification only validates past pacts of the purported agent and gives no authority for the future

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

T/F
Where A makes contract on behalf of P when they have no authority, P may later ratify the contract, retrospectively establishing an agency at the time the contract was made

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What conditions must be satisfied for a principal to ratify

A
  • principal must have been in existence at time of agent’s act
  • principal must have legal capacity to make contract themselves both when act carried out and at time of ratification
  • agent must name or sufficiently identify principal at the time of making the contract
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Can principal select parts of the contract to ratify

A

No - must ratify entire contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What must a principal do to ratify the contract

A

Communicate a sufficiently clear intention of ratifying, either by express words or by conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Y/N
A valid agency relationship can be created by
Law - if necessity

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Y/N
A valid agency relationship can be created by
Ratification

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Y/N
A valid agency relationship can be created by
Consent between the parties

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Y/N
A valid agency relationship can be created by
The agent holding themselves out as an agent

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Duties of agent

A

Accountability
No conflict of interest
performance
obedience
skill
personal performance
confidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Rights of an agent

A

Indemnity
remuneration
lien

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Agent duty - accountability explained

A

agent must provide full information to P of agency transactions and account for all monies arising from them. If they accept from the other party comission/reward to make the contract, considered a bribe and contract is fraudulent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Boston Deep Sea Fishing and Ice co v Ansell 1888

A

A was MD of C, accepted commission from suppliers on order he placed with them for goods supplied to the company. He was dismissed and company sued to recover commissions
held company was justified in dismissing A and he must account to it for commissions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Agent duty - on conflict of interest explained
Agent owes to their principal a duty not to put themselves in a situation where their own needs conflict with those of the principal
26
Agent duty - performance explained
agent who agrees to act as agent for reward as contractual obligation to perform agreed task, any agent may refuse to perform an illegal act
27
T/F Unpaid agent is not bound to carry out their agreed duties unless there is other consideration
True
28
Agent duty - obedience expalined
agent must act in accordance with principal instructions if they are lawful and reasonable. Even if they believe disobedience to be in principal best interest, must not disobey (unless illegal/unreasonable acts)
29
Agent duty - skill explained
Agent undertakes to maintain the standard of skill and care to be expected of a person in their profession
30
Agent duty - personal performance expalined
agent owes duty to perform their tasks themselves and not delegate it to another (selected often due to personal qualities)
31
Agent duty - confidence explained
agent must keep in confidence what they know of principals affairs even when agency relationship ceased
32
Agent rights - indemnity explained
Agent is entitled to be repaid their expenses and to be indemnified by their principal against losses and liabilities if acts are proper and in limits of authority. may recover expenses even if not legally bound to pay.
33
Rights of agent - remuneration explained
agent entitled to be paid agreed remuneration for their services by the principal. Must have been agreed expressly/inferred from circumstances
34
Agent rights - lien explained
agent has right to exercise a lien over property owned by principal (right to retain and hold goods pending payment of sums owed to them)
35
Duty of agent or principal Duty not to retain benefit from agency relationship
Agetn
36
Duty of agent or principal Duty to pay agreed remuneration, even if no benefit derived from acts
Principal
37
Duty of agent or principal Duty of confidence
Agent
38
What describes agent's right of lien
right to retain property owned by the principal until they have been paid
39
How may an agents authority be given
expressly, impliedly or ostensible/apparent on basis of principal's conduct
40
What is actual express authority
explicitly given by the principal to the agent to make a particular contract
41
T/F The contract made by the agent is binding on the principal and other party only if the agent was acting within the limits of their authority from the principal
True
42
What does an agent have implied authority to do
all things incidental to the actions expressly authorised to do all things that are usual by virtue of the agent's office
43
Watteau v Fenwick 1893
C owned hotel, employed previous owner to manage it. Against C's instructions, previous owner bought cigars on credit from supplier. Supplier sued C on contract, C argued not bound as previous owner had no authority to make it Held was within usual authority of a manager of hotel to buy cigars on credit and C was bound by the contract, since restriction on actual authority had not been communicated
44
what is ostensible (apparent) authority
that which their principal represents to other persons (with whom the agent deals) that they have given to the agent.
45
Is ostensible authority restricted to what is usual and incdental
No - principal may expressly or by inference from their conduct confer on the agent any amount of ostensible or apparent authroity
46
T/F It is not necessary that the agency agreement be in the form of a contract
True
47
Freeman & Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties 1964
Two individuals carried on business as property developers. One abroad and the business of the company was left entirely under control of the other who had no actual/apparent authority to entre into contracts as an agent, and was never formally appointed as MD, was allowed to. C sued company for work done on MD instruction. Held although no actual delegation and authorisation, company had led C to believe that the individual was the MD and as such an authorised agent and the claimants had relied on it.
48
T/F Representation of authority must be made to the third party and must be shown that the third party relied on the representation
True - if no causal link between loss and reliance on representation, third party will not be able ot hold principal liable
49
T/F Agent has no rights and liabilities on the contract, unless it appears that the parties intended otherwise
True - intention may be express/inferred from circumstances
50
T/F Where the agent does not name the principal, it is more likely that they will be considered to be a contracting party
True - but if clear the parties intend they should only act as an agent, they will drop out of the picture
51
Particular circumstances where agent may incur personal liability
under rules of trade usage, where they add their name as party to a negotiable instrument where they make a contract under seal, unless they do so as a trustee for the rpincipal or unless the law provides
52
What happens where the agent has authority, but is not known to be an agent
in these cases, where principal becomes known at a later date, either agent or principal may sue on the contract either the agent or principal may be sued on the contract ONLY where agent's authority existed at the time of making contract, and the contract cannot be said to have been intended to operate only between the contracting parties
53
What happens if agent has no authority
the principal cannot sue or be sued on the contract unless they choose to ratify it. agent may be liable for tort of deceit
54
Four ways in which agency can arise
agency by consent agency by estoppel agency of necessity ratification
55
T/F a principal may, in certain circumstances, ratify the acts of the agent which has retrospective effect
True
56
what is the definition of ostensible authoirty
The authority that the principal represents to other persons they have given to the agent
57
T/F An agent may disobey the instructions of the principal if they believe disobedience to be in the best interests of the principal
False
58
Three types of authority agent may have
actual express authority actual implied authority (incidental and usual) ostensible or apparent authority
59
T/F Provided agent has authority and is known to be an agent, they can never have any personal liability under the contract and only the principal can be liabile
false
60
What happens when agent has authority but is not known to be agent and principal becomes known at later date
Either agent/principal may sue on the contract either agent or principal can be sued on the contract
61
What happens when agent has no authroity
the principal cannot sue or be sued unless they choose to ratify it
62
T/F agency of necessity will arise where there is no pre-existing contractual relationships and a person can be bound by the act of a complete stranger
False
63
T/F - agency by estoppel The third party must show they have relied on a representation that the contracting party was acting as an agent for their principal
True
64
T/F - Agency by estoppel It is not necessary to show that the claimants loss was caused by reliance of the third party on representation that the contracting party was acting as an agent for their principal
False
65
T/F For an agency by estoppel to arise there must be a pre-existing agency relationship between the principal and the agent
False
66
T/F The duties of an agent are limited to what was agreed and incorporated into the agency contract between agent and prnicipal
false
67
T/F An agent and principal have a fiduciary relationship between them
True
68
In the absence of express provision regarding remuneration of an agent, what is payable
a reasonable amount of remuneration
69
What is express authority
that which is expressly given to the agent
70
What is implied authority
that which is given in regard to what is expressly authorised or which is usual by virtue of the agent's position