chapter 4 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Synaesthesia

A

condition in which sensory input of one modality is consistently and automatically experience as a sensory event in a different modality (e. g. seeing color on hearing musical notes)

  • also within the same modality ( seeing a letter, seeing a color)
  • Most common: experiencing color on seeing or hearing a letter, number or word.
  • Usually unidirected
  • only Low-level percepts like colors or special location
  • genetically or environmentally
  • Almost all report having the condition as long as they can remember
  • appr. equally distributed in men and women
  • automatic and mandatory
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

two kinds of synaesthetes by Dixon

A

Projectors: experiencing the colour as if it is in the physical world
Associatiors: see the color in their ‘mind’s eye’ (90 %)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Synaesthestes and the Stroop test

A

-if the inducer colours are congruent with the synaesthetic colours, they are faster
- if incongruent with the synaesthetic colours, they are slower
= synaesthesia is mandatory and automatic
- participants were better in answering questions in the colour of the answer (7 is green, question was 3 + 4 in green) than if not, therefore the effect holds even if the colour is not present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Mattingley (2001)

A

tested synaesthetes with visual masking tasks in which they were primed without conscious awareness
=> found that conscious awareness is necessary for synaesthetic responses
-> synaesthete’s interpretation is crucial rather than the physical properties of the stimulus, which predicted the synaesthesia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

visual search paradigms (Edquist et al., 2006))

A

Since letters are experienced as being colored tests were made if they are better in detecting letters between other distractor letters, as would the FIT theory suggest => No they aren’t: no built-in advantage in separating it out from blue distractors
-> Another proof that conscious awareness is necessary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

fMRI, EEG, & TMS studies on synesthestes

A
  • results suggest that there is activation in related regions (colour for people seeing numbers), but all this measurement instruments are unprecise
  • signal for word-colour form in the area V4 for colors was found (not measured in normal people) BUT other studies failed to detect this activation
  • activation in frontal & parietal lobes, particularly in the intra-parietal sulcus (IPS) = IPS integrates sensory information from different modalities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

fMRI, EEG, & TMS studies on synesthestes

A
  • results suggest that there is activation in related regions (colour for people seeing numbers), but all this measurement instruments are unprecise
  • signal for word-colour form in the area V4 for colors was found (not measured in normal people) BUT other studies failed to detect this activation
  • activation in frontal & parietal lobes, particularly in the intra-parietal sulcus (IPS) = IPS integrates sensory information from different modalities
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

brain functions in synesthestes

A
  • Brain always integrates information across modalities to develop a useful model of the world
    In synaesthesia: regions related to the perception of the inducer become linked to regions related to the experience that the former activates the latter
    -> Available in everyone, just stronger in synaesthetes or inhibited in non-synaesthetes
    Theory suggest that we all had the connections as strong, but they are usually pruned out in early childhood
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

‘Dishinhibited-feedback’ theory

A

-> connections are there in everyone , but the activity is usually inhibited
- LSD and other hallucinogenic drugs can induce temporary synaesthetic experiences
-> LSD involves the disinhibition of existing pathways
Functional imaging evidence supports this theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Synasthesia conclusion

A
  • some people with synesthesia have enhanced memory and mathematical manipulations and many synaesthetes are drawn towards creative arts
  • Synasthesia can take on many forms
  • it runs in families
  • it is automatic & mandatory
  • it requires conscious awareness
  • it can be seen as evolutionary disadvantage
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Blindsight

A
  • restricted visual field due to brain damage
  • Scotoma = A blind area within the visual field, resulting from damage to the visual system
  • Damage to left striate cortex will result in blindness in the right visual field of both eyes and visa verse
  • People were able to point to a light source on their ‘blind sight’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The patient DB

A
  • was able to report details about objects appearing in the blind areas, but no conscious experience of seeing them:
  • Detect presence
  • Indicate location in space by pointing
  • Discriminate between moving and stationary
  • Between horizontal and vertical lines
  • Distinguish letters X and O (unable to distinguish X and triangle and other letter => X and O dependent on low-level characteristic of these stimuli)
  • Was not able to distinguish between rectangles of various sizes, between straight- or curved-sided triangles
  • -> people do perceive something but without being conscious aware
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

sceptics to explain blingsight

A
  • Blindsighted patients might responding to light, which was reflected from the object onto functioning areas of the visual field (stray light)
  • > BUT this fails to explain how DB distinguishes X and O
  • > evidence against the stray light explanation came from DB’s inability to respond accurately to objects whose image fell onto his blindspot(= where the optic nerve passes through the retina and where we are all blind)-> we would expect him to perform equally well whether the image fell on blindspot or in the scotoma.
  • -> DB could not detect objects presented at blindspot, but those presented to scotoma( immediately adjacent to the blindspot)
  • Computer screens that use ‘raster displays’ give a ‘ghost’ image on the other side of the screen that can explain some blindsight patients abilities
  • islands (no proof)
  • Change in response criterion but not in sensitivity
  • Patients equally sensitive to the presence of a stimulus but less willing to report conscious awareness
  • change in response criterion but also qualitative change
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

islands ( Kentridge et al.)

A

Small areas or ‘islands’ in the scotoma within which vision is spared and blindsight might be mediated by what is left of the primary visual pathway rather than other secondary pathways.
- Kentridge et al. looked for scattered regions of spared vision in one patient using a procedure which ensured that the effects of eye movements were abolished. Under these testing conditions, they noted that blindsight did not extend across the whole of the area of the scotoma, but was evident in some areas even without eye movement,
conclusion : although there may be some spared islands within the scotoma, these cannot account for all blindsight.-> study not been evident in patients eye sight and not been proven in the MRI

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

two-alternative-forced-choice tas

A

test in which one of this two time intervals was the signal

-> showed that there is not just change in response criterion, but also by qualitative differences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

widely accepted explanation for blindsight

A

two separate visual systems :
1. primitive non-striate system => sensitive to movement, speed, and other characteristics without conscious perception, function : localize
2. More advanced striate system => conscious perception, function: identify
=> Perhaps blindsight represents the working of the primitive visual system whose functioning is normally masked by the conscious perception
-the two system might be incompatible types of representation, therefore only one of them became access to consciousness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

DB rather..

A

felt than saw something
-> however, blindsight is a very poor substitute for normal vision with significantly reduced sensitivity to fundamental aspects of the scene

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Unilateral spatial neglect (USN)

A
  • difficulty in noticing or acting on information from one side of space typically caused by a brain lesion to the opposite hemisphere.
  • Also called hemispatial neglect or hemispatial inattention.
  • Patients fail to respond to stimuli which they can see
  • Main reason: Stroke)->84 % of patients with damage to the right hemisphere from stroke show symptoms
  • > 64 % of patients with damage to the left
  • > Right hemisphere lesions are more severe and persistant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Odd behavior of people with USN

A

Ignore people approaching from the damaged side, eat food only from the side of the plate they see, wash and dress only that side, draw a clock only on the right side

  • Patients can remember places they were from one side and if they imagined to stay at the opposite square, they remembered the other side
  • Patients would choose a not-burning house over a burning house, even if they failed to recognize the fire

-Patients with USN have difficulties remaining focussed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Difference USN & visual field loss (VFL)

A

USN can exert an influence across modalities: over haptic & somatosensory perception, smell, audition, imagery
VFL restricted to vision (blind area moves with the eyes)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Variations of USN

A
  • Egocentric space: Objects to one side of the body
  • Allocentric space: Something’s side that is not seen (e.g. a page or room) - > rotating an object until patients sees the other side of it is possible
22
Q

attention and USN

A

-Patients recognize objects that are pointed out
-Competition seems to play a role in USN:
if a stimulus appears in isolation in the neglected field it is often detected
but not if it appears in competition with a rival on the good side it is more likely missed => called extinction =>tested through confrontation testing (finger wiggle on the bad side to see if it is recognized)

23
Q

extinction

A

if a stimulus appears in competition with a rival on the good side it is likely missed, even if it was pointed out to the patient

24
Q

confrontation test

A

wiggling with fingers on the bad side to see whether a USN patient recognizes the signal

25
Q

Rehabilitation of USN patients

A
  • Robertson: movements of the patients’ left arm/hand could generally enhance visual awareness of the left, even if those movements occurred out of sight.
  • Karnath: By simulated neck movement through electrodes and deviating prism lenses, USN patients improved in spatial tasks, because the body believes that the body was rotated
  • Spatial attention may reflect a dynamic competitive balance between the widely distributed networks in the hemispheres that can easily be disrupted
26
Q

explanations for USN (brain related)

A

normal spatial attention may reflect a dynamic, competitive balance between the widely disributed networks in hemispheres -> the left hemisphere is pushing attention into right space and the right hemisphere pushing back to the left.
=> In USN we are seeing the effect of the lesioned hemisphere (which may have much residual function) but also its exaggeration due to the supressing effects of its undamaged rival

27
Q

Agnosia

A

the failure to recognise or interpret stimuli despite adequate sensory function. It is usually classified by sensory modality

28
Q

Visual agnosia

A

the failure to recognise objects that are seen.

29
Q

Two kinds of visual agnosia

A
  • Apperceptive agnosia= normal visual acuity with an inability to draw an object, to say whether two similar objects were the same or different, describe components
  • Associative agnosia=able to draw an object, match similar objects and describe parts – unable to recognise the objects they had just seen or drawn
30
Q

apperceptive and associative (Lissauer)

A

two stages are serial and hierarchical:
-In Apperceptive stage the elements or components are established
-In Associative stage these elements are integrated into a representation of the whole object which is then linked to a store of object knowledge, that enables recognition
=>
apperceptive agnosia: intact store of knowledge about objects, but unable to distinguish the shape and unable to identify visually
associative agnosia: able to perceive objects but often unable to identify them
If not able to copy a drawing: apperceptive
If not able to recognize object: associative

31
Q

an other word for apperceptive agnosia is …

and common causes for it

A

… Form agnosia= unable to discriminate between objects and unable to copy line drawings of objects

  • common cause : Carbon monoxide poisoning
  • > very confused and distorted visual world, as if we would look through a powerful microscope
32
Q

an other word for associative agnosia is…

and common causes for it

A

… integrative agnosia: unable to recognise the objects they had just seen or drawn

  • common cause: trokes, brain trauma & Alzheimer
  • > more medial ventral lesions than patients with form agnosia
33
Q

patients with visual form agnosia are often still able to…

A
  • pick up objects accurately
  • > example patient Dee : Action (reaching, grasping) and recognition abilities might be facilitated through different brain areas
  • They are unconscious
  • The two visual mainstreams
34
Q

patient SA

A
  • had form agnosia
  • processed more on a local level
  • Dorsal route damage
  • Could not match shapes
  • Fine local details
  • Drawings contain errors
  • SA was better at identifying animate objects
35
Q

patient HJA

A
  • had integrative agnosia
  • processed more on a global level
  • Ventral route damage
  • Match shapes
  • Able to copy drawings
  • Could code shapes of objects
  • Could not segment parts of objects and group them
  • HJA was better at identifying inanimate objects
36
Q

global level/ local level explanation (Riddoch)

A

successful object recognition depends on ability to code the global aspects of an object’s shape with the fine and local detail at the same time

37
Q

Prosopagnosia

A

An inability to recognize faces despite adequate visual acuity

38
Q

two differentiations in prosopagnosia

A
  • Developmental prosopagnosia= thought to be a result of early neurological trauma that might be caused by accident or injury.
  • Congenital prosopagnosia= thought to be present from birth on and is thought to occur without any apparent brain injury.
39
Q

possible causes for prosopagnosia (brain)

A
  • Bilateral lesions occipito-temporal cortex: => both hemispheres play an important role in face processing
  • unilateral damage in the right hemisphere ( seldom) and even more seldom by left-hemisphere damage
  • Damageto fusiform and lingual gyri:
  • > Fusiform gyrus contains area dedicated to face processing (FFA)
  • no single area in the brain responsible for processing faces
40
Q

Fusiform face area (FFA)

A

area in the fusiform gyrus dedicated to face processing

  • Variability in individuals of FFA’s location
  • Located through the ‘functional localiser approach: Tests are performed and activity in defined areas measured
41
Q

Face recognition requires…

A

… a within category judgement:

-Discriminate between similar-looking faces from our ‘pool’ of all other people we know

42
Q

Individuation

A

Recognizing one specific item from other members of that class of item (e.g. recognizing the face of a particular individual).

43
Q

within category: animals (cows)

A
  • some can recognize cows but not people
  • some cannot recognize cows and also not people
  • some can just recognize people, but not cows anymore
  • > there is still evidence that animals can be distinguished
44
Q

covert recognition (Bruyer)

A

on some brain level, some patients do discriminate between faces

45
Q

Covert familiarity

A

evoked neural potentials produced by viewing familiar faces
EEG and fMRI:
-neural activity for familiar and famous people,
even when they did not recognized them & no conscious familiarity
-FFA only activated for familiar, not for famous people:
FFA involved in covert processing as well as in individuating faces
-Easier to associate faces with real names than with randomly assigned names

46
Q

Explanations for covert recognition (Bauer)

A

-Conscious overt face recognition => ventral pathway
-Covert recognition => dorsal pathway
=> Damage to ventral pathway in prosopagnosia

47
Q

Disconnection hypothesis (Haan)

A

Disconnection between an intact face-processing system and a higher system that facilitates conscious awareness

48
Q

Independent activation and competition (IAC) model

Burton

A

Disconnection between connecting strengths
-Different units are linked together with bidirectional weighted connection links
Eg. Face recognition units (FRU) or person identity nodes (PINS)
-model is able to simulate covert recognition behaviours
-Weights (or strength) of the links between e.g. FRU and PINS are necessary
-> Activation still occurs in the FRU, but this activation does not reach the level that is required for overt recognition
=> Covert recognition is not an “all or none” phenomenon

49
Q

Contingental prosopagnosia and brain abnormalities

A
  • present from birth and without apparent brain injury but with abnormalities in the fusiform gyrus => too small!
    -> the smaller, the more severe impairment
  • the nature of the impairment in contingental is unclear yet
    => Associative & integrative impairment => recognize face as face, but unable to link to stored representation
    Also show signs of covert recognition!
50
Q

Developmental prosopagnosia

A
  • result of early neurological trauma, maybe by accident or injury
  • > Sometimes impairments in ability to process facial emotion
  • impairment in making gender judgements
  • > some individuals show same signs as people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but some others do not