Chapter 35- Common Law Remedies Flashcards
1
Q
What is the purpose of damages
A
- To compensate the innocent party for losses from a breach of contract
- Damages: This refers to the sum of money paid for compensation
- The damages aim to put the person in the same position they were in had not the breach occurred
2
Q
List the measures/ calculations of Damages
A
- Expectation loss
- Reliance loss
- Non-pecuniary loss
3
Q
What are expectation losses
A
- These aim to put the innocent party in the position they would have been in if the contract had been performed
4
Q
What are reliance losses
A
- These damages compensate for wasted expenditure
- They also apply where it would be difficult to assess what the benefits would have been to the claimant
5
Q
What are non-pecuniary losses
A
- These cover losses that are not financial such as:
- emotional distress
- pain and suffering
- damage to commercial reputation
- physical inconvenience
6
Q
List the limitations on recovery of damages
A
- Causation
- Remoteness
- Mitigation
7
Q
Define Causation
A
- The breach must be the cause of the loss
- the court will decide whether the breach is the main reason for the loss suffered by the claimant
8
Q
Define remoteness
A
- Losses must have been foreseeable at the time of contracting
9
Q
Define mitigation
A
- The innocent party is required to take reasonable steps to minimize losses
- The claimant should not take any unreasonable steps that would increase the amount of loss
10
Q
Advantages to use of remedy of damages
A
- Provides financial compensation
- Flexible
- widely recognized
11
Q
Disadvantages to use of remedy
A
- May not fully compensate for non-pecuniary losses
- does not restore the specific performance of the contract
12
Q
Evaluate the use of common law remedies
A
- Easier to quantify financial loss than emotional distress
- When calculating monetary damages, some guess work is used however, is limited in non-pecuniary losses
- Allowing distress claims can lead to floodgates of cases
- Compensation for emotional loss is cheaper
- Courts rarely award damages for emotional distress in business cases
- Loss of reputation is only compensable once they prove financial harm has been done
13
Q
Evaluate the causation and remoteness of damages as well as mitigation
A
- Not fair to make defendant liable for every consequential loss
- Justice would be served if there was a link between the breach of contract and loss
- Would only be fair to claim for losses that are reasonably foreseeable.
- The tests relies on what the reasonable man MIGHT have foreseen not what they MUST seen
- Mitigation is necessary in order to prevent defendant being liable for excessive losses
- Mitigation can be subjective