Chapter 14- Theft Flashcards
define theft from the section its from
Section ONE
they are guilty of theft if the dishonesty appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it
list the sections 2-6 and what they cover
Section 2- dishonestly
Section 3-appropriates
Section 4- property
Section 5- belonging to another
Section 6- intention of permanently depriving another
Which sections act as the actus reas
-S 3 appropriation
s 4 property
s 5- belonging to another
state 3 rights that the owner has over their property-
-selling. it
-destroying it
-hiring it out
-lending it
-consuming it
describe the case of R v Vinall and when did appropriation occur
The defendants saw some people with a bike and attacked them. one of them took the bike and abandoned it later.
Appropriation occurred either after taking the bike OR when they abandoned the bike
List 3 types of items in property s 4
-Money
-personal property
-real property
Describe the case of R v Woodman and which property was stolen
-A company had scrap metal that they were unaware of that remained and the defendant stole them. The stolen property was real propertyand fenced.
what are the subsections for s 5
s5(2)- trust property
s5(3)-property received under an obligation
s5(4)-property received by another’s mistake
Describe the case of R v Webster and state which subsection it is from
-An army sergeant received a duplicate medal by mistake and sold it as the duplicate still had huge value.
-s5(4)
which sections act as Mens rea
-s2- dishonestly
s6-intention to permanently deprive the other person
which behaviour is not considered dishonest in the section
-if they believe they have the right in law to take the property
-if they believe they would have gained consent from the owner
-if they believe the owner cannot be discovered by taking reasonable steps
what does appropriation refer to
-This is the assumption by a person over the rights of an owner
Describe the case of R v Small how was he not held for theft
-An old car was found by the defendant and he thought it was abandoned, he took it and fixed it. He honestly believed he had the legal right to take the car
Describe the case of R v Barton and Booth and how they were dishonest
-Barton and booth took advantage of vulnerable elderly people in their nursing home. They showed dishonesty from the 2017 civil case
weaknesses to the law relating to dishonesty
- the beliefs of the defendant must be proved objectively
- The views of the jury may be unclear and different