Chapter 15- Robbery Flashcards

1
Q

what does the Theft act state about Robbery and which section does it cover

A

Section 8-
the person is guilty of robbery if they steal while either subjecting the person to force or threatening them to it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the 2 elements of actus reus

A

-theft
-giving force or having the intention to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is the law “on any person”

A

This means that force can apply to not just the victim but other people present as well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

give an example case of where force was applied immediately before the theft

A

R v Hale
The defendant used force on the victim in order to get her jewelry right after.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are the 3 elements of mens rea of robbery

A

-permanent deprivatiton
-dishonesty
-intention to use force to get the property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the 3 categories for sentencing robbery

A

-street and less sophisticated commercial
-professionally planned commercial
-dwelling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

mention 2 points of elements of theft when evaluating robbery

A

-appropriation can be considered as a continuing act
-a person is guilty even if appropriation had occurred before any force was given

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mention 2 points on level of force when evaluating robbery

A

-there may be issues when deciding what was the level of force when it was minimal
-accidental force to someone else and not the victim does not count as robbery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Describe the case of R v Lockley on level of force and why it was difficult for the jury to make a decision

A

-The defendant was stealing some cans of beer and the shop owner caught him. The defendant used force on him to escape and act of appropriation was considered a continuing act. The jury had to decide whether the theft was complete before the use of force or after

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Describe the case of Corcoran v Anderson

A

A man hit a woman’s back and tugged at her bag. She dropped her bag and let go of it. The man ran off with it and the theft was complete hence, he was guilty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly