chapter 2 Flashcards

1
Q

quality scientific research meets the following criteria:

A
  1. it is based on measurements that are objective, valid and reliable
  2. it can be generalized
  3. it uses techniques that reduce bias
  4. it is made public
  5. it can be replicated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

objective measurements

A

the measure of behaviour that, within an allowed margin of error, is consistent across instruments and observers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

variable (objectivity)

A

the object, concept, or event being measured (independent and dependent)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

operational definitions

A

statements that describe the procedures (or operations) and specific measures that are used to record observations (what you’re doing vs. what you get)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

validity

A

refers to the degree to which an instrument or procedure actually measures what it claims to measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

reliability

A

when it provides consistent and stable answers scores multiple observations and points in time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

test-retest reliability examines

A

whether scores on a given measure of behaviour are consistent across text sessions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

generalizability

A

refers to the degree to which one set of results can be applied to other situations, individuals or events

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

population

A

the group that researchers want to generalize about

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

sample

A

a select group of population members

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

random sample

A

a sampling technique in which every individual of a population has an equal chance of being included

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

convenience samples

A

samples of individuals who are the most readily available

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

ecological validity

A

meaning that the results of a laboratory study can be applied to or repeated in the natural environment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

researcher bias

A

distortion of evidence because of the personal motives and expectations of the viewer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

subject bias

A

changes in behaviour that result from knowledge of being observed for evaluated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

hawthorne effect

A

a behaviour change that occurs as a result of being observed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

social desirability

A

participants may respond in ways that increase the chances that they will be viewed favourably by the experimenter and/or other participants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

placebo effect

A

a measurable and experienced improvement in health or behaviour that cannot be attributable to a medication or treatment
- participants expectations or beliefs about what’s supposed to happen may bring about behavioural change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

demand characteristics

A

subtly communicates cues given off by the experimenter or the experimental context that provide information about how participants are expected to behave, producing the disease reaction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

anonymity

A

means that each individuals responses are recorded without any name or other personal information that could link a particular individual to specific results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

confidentiality

A

means that the results will he seem only by the researcher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

reducing subject bias

A
  • provide confidentiality and anonymity to gather honest responses from research participants
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

single-blind study

A

the participants do not know the true purpose of the study, or else do not know which type of treatment they are receiving

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

double-blind study

A

a study in which neither the participant nor the experimenter knows the exact treatment for any individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
peer review
a process in which papers submitted for publication in scholarly journals are read and critiques by experts in the specific field of study
26
peer review involves two main tasks
- an editor receives the manuscript from the researcher and determines whether it is appropriate subject matter for the journal - the editor sends copies of the manuscript to a select group of peer reviewers and critique the methods and results of the research and make recommendations to the editor regarding the merits of the research
27
replication
the process of repeating a study and finding a similar outcome each time
28
publication bias
successful and novel results are published and studies that showed no effects are not
29
why replication is so important
it helps us determine if these published studies are simply statistical flukes
30
a characteristic of poor research, anecdotal evidence
an individuals story or testimony about an observation or event that is used to make a claim as evidence
31
questionable evidence, appeal to authority
the belief in an “experts” claim even when no supporting data or scientific evidence is present
32
appeal to common sense
a claim that appears to be sound, but lacks supporting scientific evidence
33
research design
a set of methods that allows a hypothesis to be tested
34
descriptive research answers
the question of “what” a phenomenon is
35
qualitative research
involves examining an issue or behaviour without performing numerical measurements of the variables
36
critical thinking examine, evaluate and entertains
examines assumptions evaluated evidence entertains alternative explanations
37
hindsight bias
tendency to believe, after learning outcome, that one could foresee it (“i knew it all along” phenomenon)
38
the process of research: the scientific method
observe (initial observation or question) predict (form a hypothesis) test (design the study) interpret (analyze the data and draw conclusions communicate (report the findings, consider open questions, act on open questions)
39
standardization
using uniform and consistent procedures in all phases of data collection
40
representative sample
a subset that closely matches the characteristics of the population being studied
41
quantitative research
involves the examining an issue or behaviour by using numerical measurements and/or statistics
42
case study
an in-depth report about the details of a specific case
43
case study occurs when
an individual undergoes a rare event or exhibits highly unusual characteristics
44
information from case studies
are not considered definitive but are useful in generating new research (i.e. new hypotheses)
45
scientists performing a case study describe
an individuals history and behaviour in great deal | - an intensive observation of a particular individual
46
naturalistic observations
unobtrusively observe and record behaviour as it occurs in the subjects natural environment
47
naturalistic observations can occur
a where that behaviour occurs
48
self-reporting
a method in which responses are provided directly by the people who are being studied, typically through face-to-face interviews, phone surveys, paper and pencil tests, and web-based questionnaires
49
self reporting methods allow
researchers to assess attitudes, opinions, beliefs, and abilities
50
how do researchers figure out if their questions are valid?
researchers perform a large amount of pretending in order to calculate norms, or average patterns of data
51
correlational research
involves measuring the degree of association between two or more variables
52
correlational methods
method is used to determine the extent to which two variables can’t be manipulated
53
if correlations are posistive
it means that the two variables change values in the same direction
54
positive correlation range
+0.1 to +1.0
55
if correlations are negative
it means that as the value of one variable increases, the value of the other variable tends to decrease
56
negative correlation range
-0.1 to -1.0
57
a correlation coefficient of zero means
that there is no relationship between the two variables
58
third variable problem
the possibility that a third, unmeasured variable is actually responsible for a well established correlation between two variables
59
independent variable
a factor that is manipulated by the researcher. the causal part of the relationship
60
dependent variable
a factor that the experimenter measures to determine the impact of the independent variable. the effective part of the relationship
61
illusory correlations
relationships that really exist only in the mind, rather than in reality
62
random assignment
a technique for dividing samples into two or more groups in which participants are equally likely to be placed in any condition of the experiment
63
experimental methods
procedures used to make strong causal claims about the impact of the IV (manipulated) on the DV (measured)
64
confounding variable
a variable outside of the researchers control that might affect or provide an alternative explanation for the results
65
between subject design
an experimental design in which we compare the performance of participants who are in different groups
66
experimental group
the group in the experiment that receives a treatment or the stimuli targeting a specific behaviour
67
control group
the group that does not receive the treatment or stimuli targeting a specific behaviour; this group therefore serves as a baseline to which the experimental group is compared
68
a between subjects design
allows researchers to examine differences between groups
69
within subjects design
an experimental design in which the same participants respond to all types of stimuli or experience all experimental conditions
70
quasi experimental research
a research technique in which the two or more groups that are compared are selected based on predetermined characteristics, rather than random assignment
71
case studies strengths and limitations
yields detailed information, often of rare conditions or observations. focus on a single subject limits generalizability
72
naturalistic observations strengths and limitations
allows for detailed descriptions of subjects in environments where behaviour normally occurs. poor control over possible influential variables
73
survey/questionnaires strengths and limitations
quick and often convenient way of gathering large quantities of self report data. poor control; participants may not answer honestly
74
correlational study
shows strength of relationships between variables. | does not allow researcher to determine cause and effect relationships
75
experiment strengths and limitations
tests for cause and effect relationships; offers good control over influential variables. risk of being artificial with limited generalization to real world situations
76
research ethics board
a committee of researchers and officials at an institution charged with the protection of research participants
77
perceptual constancy
the ability to perceive objects as having constant shape, size, and colour despite changes in perspective
78
shape constancy
we judge the angle of the object relative to our position
79
size constancy
is based on judgments of how close an object is relative to ones position as well as to the positions of other objects
80
colour constancy
allows us to recognize an objects colour under varying levels of illumination