Chapter 18: Macroevolution Flashcards
microevolutionary processes will
alter the pattern and extent of genetic and phenotypic variation within populations
- when these processes differ between populations, the populations will diverge genetically, and they may eventually become so different that they become different and distinct species
speciation
smallest evolutionary independent unit
the process of species formation
- independence occurs when mutation, selection, gene flow, and drift operate on populations seperately
- evolution=changes in allele frequencies
- species form a boundary for the spread of alleles
WOULDN’T REPRODUCE W/ ANOTHER SPECIES
- genetics are too different it would create a nonviable offspring
- if they can interbreed fine then they aren’t different species
Morphological definition of a species
- all individuals of a species share measurable traits that distinguish them from individuals of other species
- concept dates to Linnaeus’ classification system
PRO: works for extinct (fossils) or living species
i.e. field guides for plants/birds use this information
macroevolution
occurs at or above the species level
Mutation, NS, migration, and drift causes populations to diverge and form new species…. these can only be beneficial if
isolated
different species follow
different evolutionary trajectories
speciation has never been DIRECTLY observed in nature or a lab, but there are many examples of where populations become so divergent that they can no longer exchange genetic material and become distinct species
example: stickleback (isolated in freshwater)
a lack of gene flow
can also be described as speciation
Disadvantages for morphological definition
- individuals in a single species look very different in size and coloration (mallards)
morphology does not help distinguish some closely related species that are nearly identical in appearance
- tells us little about evolutionary processes that produce new species
{MALARD}
male = green
female = beige
(we initially thought they were 2 different species)
- individuals may look different subtle ways
- can vary by sex, geography, which makes them look different
- could have subtle differences that WE must generalize
Diagnostic Characters
Warblers:
these birds can look very similar but they actually have subtle differences
= diagnostic character
= experts can see these
- distinguished species via feather colour on throat and rump
Biological Species Concept
- groups of interbreeding natural populations that are reproductively isolated from (don’t produce fertile offspring with) other such groups
- legal definition for endangered species acts
advantage:
- meaningful criteria for identifying species because it confirms lack of gene flow
- lack of gene flow is the key test of evolutionary independence (sexually reproducing spp)
- hard to apply in many situations (hard to force organisms to mate = you kinda have to SEE if they breed together)
- if populations don’t overlap, its hard to tell (“is this whale in SA = whale in NA?”, if they have a geographic barrier how will they mate?)
Disadvantages for biological species concept
- problems with biological species (cannot be used for the following)
*asexual organisms = some insects
*extinct organisms = dinosaurs
Phylogenetic Species definition
- using both morphological and genetic sequence data you have to first reconstruct the evolutionary tree for the organism of interest
- then define a phylogenetic species as a cluster [B1;B2;B3] of populations that emerge from the same branch
= is the species in the same cluster, if yes, then they’re the same species - thus, phylogenetic species comprises populations that share a recent evolutionary history
PRO:
- can be applied to any group of organisms including extinct ones (if u have morphological {fossils} or genetic data)
- works for asexually reproducing species
Disadvantages of Phylogenetic Species
- detailed phylogenies not available for all organisms, and thus, not able to apply phylogenetic criterion to all species
= if you don’t have a strong data set you probably cant compare them to a lot of things
Geographical Variation
- species can exhibit geographic variation
(i.e. birds from Canada vs birds from Mexico= gain subtle differences) - populations can differ genetically and phenotypically due to geographical separation
- neighbouring popns share characteristics because they’re in the same environments, exchange individuals and experience comparable NS
- very different in populations that are far away
Gene Flow and Geographical variation
(populations living far away)
- gene flow is less likely to occur between distant populations, their gene pools and phenotypes will be different
- widely separated populations live in diff conditions and experience diff patterns of selection
- geographically separated populations of a species have dramatic phenotypic variation, we identify them as different subspecies [local variants of a species]
Individuals from different subspecies will
interbreed where their distribution meets
- offspring will usually exhibit intermediate phenotypes
- 5 subspecies of rat snakes in eastern N.A. and they differ in colour and presence of stripes
What is geographical variation
2 versions
patterns of geographic and studies that examine how the variation related to climatic or habitat variation provide insights into the speciation process
Two of the best studied patterns are:
- ring species [salamander case study]
- clinal variation [house sparrow case study]
how does climate and habitat provide insight into speciation
Ring species
- ring shaped geographic distribution that surrounds uninhabitable areas
- adjacent populations exchange genetic material
- BUT gene flow btwn distant populations occur only through intermediate populations
(further apart the animals get the less genes are shared) - i.e. lungless salamander
a) SOUTHERN SUBSPECIES: since they still have the ability to exchange genetic information through intervening populations that form the ring they are of the same species - in the intermediate stage of species formation
b) but in general, the populations are so divergent they’re separate species
Salamanders and being Ring species
- widely distributed in coastal mountains and Sierra Nevada, BUT, cannot survive in hot dry central valley
- 7 subspecies differ in a variety of traits (e.g. colour, size, ecology, etc.)
- adjacent subspecies interbreed where they overlap in geography (intermediate phenotypes are common)
- southern end of Central Valley adjacent subspecies rarely interbreed (differentiated so much, no longer exchange genetics)
What would happen if one of the salamander species came back to the ring
- after a long period of separation, they won’t recognize each other
- but they’ll still produce the same fertile babies
clinical variation
- when species distributed over large, environmentally diverse area, some traits exhibit a cline
CLINE= pattern of smooth variation in a trait along a geographic gradient (continuous connection amongst all populations)
- e.g. clinal variation in body size
- northern species have larger bodies and shorter appendages (conserve body heat)
clinial variation is due to
- oftentimes, due to gene flow between adjacent populations that are adapted to slightly different conditions
- at opposite ends of clines (separated by large distances) may have little gene flow via reproduction
- thus, over big enough cline, distant populations are genetically and morphologically distinct
mechanisms of genetic isolation
*how do species form?
1) initial step isolates the population
2) next step results in divergence in traits such as mating system or habitat use
3) final step produces reproductive isolation
- isolation and divergence steps take place over time and to occur while populations were located in and adapting to different geographic regions
final phase:
- occurs when the diverged populations came back into physical contact (secondary contact)
{test to see if two individuals, one that has been separated can still be fertile}
*isolation/divergence/secondary contact model provides framework to work with (too simple)