Chapter 16 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Activist Approach

A

an approach to judicial review which holds that judges should discover the general principles underlying the Constitution and its often vague language, amplify those principles on the basis of some moral or economic philosophy and apply them to cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

In Forma Pauperis

A

a request to have a court waive filing fees in a civil action because the plaintiff is poor

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Judicial Restraint

A

a judicial philosophy in which judges play minimal policymaking roles, leaving the duty strictly to the legislation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Judicial Review

A

the right of federal courts to declare laws of Congress and acts yhe executive branch void and unenforceable if they are judged to be in conflict with the constitution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Litmus Test

A

a test of ideological purity used by recent presidents in selecting and senators in confirming judges to nominate to federal courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Per Curiam Opinion

A

a brief and unsigned opinion by the Supreme Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Plaintiff

A

party that intitiates a suit in law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

political question

A

an issue that the court refuses to consider because it believes the Constitution has left it entirely to another branch to decide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Remedy

A

a judicial order setting forth what must be done to correct a situation a judge believes to be wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Senatorial Courtesy

A

the tradition bu which the senate will not confirm a district court judge if the senator who is from that state and of the presidents party objects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Solicitor General

A

the third ranking officer in the justice department who decides what cases the federal government will appeal from lower courts and personally approves every case the government presents to the Supreme Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Sovereign Immunity

A

a legal concept that forbids a person from suing the government without its consent Congress has given its consent for the government to be sued in many cases involving disputes over contracts or damage done as a result of negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

standing

A

a legal concept that refers to who is entitled to bring a case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rules Govern Standing

A

1- there must be an actual controversy between real adversaries
2- the person bringing suit must show that he or she has been harmed by the law or practice involved in the complaint
3- being a taxpayer does not entitle a person to challenge the constitutional of a government action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

State Decisis

A

an informal rule of judicial decision making in which jugdes try to follow precedent in deciding cases That is a court case today should br settled in accordance with prior decisions on similar cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Writ of Certiorari

A

a legal document issued by the Supreme Court to request the court transcripts of a case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Constitution Court

A

a fed court authorized by Article III of the Constitution that keeps judges in office during good behavior and precedents their salaries from being reduced

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Criminal Law

A

the gov changes an individual who violated specific laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Diversity Case

A

jurisdiction conferred by the Constitution on federal courts to hear cases involving citizens of different states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Dred Scott v Sandford

A

ruled that people of African descent imported into the United States and held as slaves or their descendants, whether or not they were slaves, were not legal persons and could never be citizens of the United States and the U S Congress had no authority to prohibit slavery in federal territories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Fee Shifting

A

rule that allows a plaintiff to recover costs from the defendant if the plaintiff wins

22
Q

Friday Conference

A

the meeting at which the justices vote on cases that they have recently heard

23
Q

Gang of Fourteen

A

agreed to block filibusters unless there were “extraordinary circumstances”

24
Q

Civil Law

A

rules defining relationships among private citizens

25
Q

Class Action Suit

A

a means by which one who has been injured can bring action on behalf of all similarly situated

26
Q

Concurring Opinion

A

a signed opinion in which one or more members agree with the majority view but for different reasons

27
Q

Appellate Jurisdiction

A

jurisdiction of courts that hear cases brought to them on appeal from lower courts These courts do not review the factual record, only the legal issues involved

28
Q

Bloc Voting

A

a pattern of voting behavior of two or more justices

29
Q

Amicus curiae

A

a means by which one who has an interest in a case but is not directly involved can present arguments in favor of one sude

30
Q

In Federalist 78, Alexander Hamilton described the judicial branch as the ___________ branch

A

least dangerous

31
Q

Seventy years ago judicial activists tended to be

A

conservatives

32
Q

What did the decision in McCulloch v Maryland establish?

A

Judicial Review

33
Q

The text suggests “judicial activism” was born in the

A

1890s

34
Q

From 1937 to 1974 the supreme court did not declare a single federal law dealing with __________ unconstitutional

A

regulations of business

35
Q

FDRs court packing bill is an example of a presidential action designed to

A

influence the way in which courts decide cases

36
Q

recent controversy regarding judicial appointments the “nuclear option” focused on

A

revising senate rules to block filibusters

37
Q

conflict surrounding some supreme court nominations can only be explained by the fact that

A

court plays such a large role in making public policy

38
Q

restraint orriented judges differ from activist judges in that they are more likely

A

apply rules that are clearly stated in the constitution

39
Q

who was defiant of the supreme court rulings and taunted the chief justice to enforce its decisions?

A

President Andrew Jackson

40
Q

Roger B taney was deliberately chosen for the Supreme Court because he

A

favored a strong national government

41
Q

from the civil war to the beginning of the new deal, the issue that the Supreme Court faced

A

government regulation of the economy

42
Q

owen roberts change of view was clear concession to

A

public opinion

43
Q

dramatic change in the 90s court struck down a stature that ______ did not affect interstate commerce

A

carrying a gun

44
Q

the court of military appeals is an example of a

A

legislative court

45
Q

when politicians complain about litmus tests in judicial nominations they are probably

A

not part of the group that is currently in power

46
Q

if you wish to declare bankruptcy you must do so in

A

a federal district court

47
Q

Certiorari is a latin word meaning, roughly,

A

“made more certain”

48
Q

cert is issued and a case is scheduled for a hearing if _______ justices agree to hear it

A

4

49
Q

means by which one who has interest in a case but is not directly involved can present arguments

A

amicus curiae

50
Q

1868, case of mississippi newspaper editor was extraordinary because

A

congress took courts power to consider case during appeal