Chapter 13-Neobehaviorism Flashcards
The philosophy of science according to which theoretical concepts are inadmissible if they are tied to the observable world through operational definitions
Logical positivism
According to logical positivism, terms that refer to empirical events
Observational terms
According to logical positivism, those terms that are employed to explain empirical observations
Theoretical terms
Describe logical positivism and its historical origins, including the positions of Comte, Mach, and the Vienna Circle
Logical positivism was proposed as a solution to finding a way for science to use theory without encountering the dangers inherent in metaphysical speculation to describe such concepts that were being discovered as gravity, magnetism, atom, force, electron, and mass indispensable which could not be observed directly
The ultimate authority for the logical positivist was empirical observation, and theories were considered useful only if they helped explain what was observed
Comte- individual and group behavior can and should be studied scientifically and he coined the the term sociology to describe such a study
Mach- argued that all we can be certain of is our sensations which form the ultimate subject matter for all sciences. Introspection was essential
Vienna circle- came up with the view of science called logical positivism and took the older positivism of Conte and Mach and combined it with the rigors of formal logic. For them, abstract theoretical terms were allowed only if such terms could be logically tied to empirical observations
A definition that relates an abstract concept to the procedures used to measure it
Operational definition
The belief that all abstract scientific concepts should be operationally defined
Operationism
A belief growing out of logical positivism that all sciences should share common assumptions, principles, and methodologies and should model themselves after physics
Physicalism
Agreed with older forms of behaviorism that overt behavior should be psychology’s subject matter but disagreed that theoretical speculation concerning abstract entities must be avoided. Such speculation was accepted providing that the theoretical terms employed are operationally defined and lead to testable predictions about overt behavior
Neobehaviourism
Describe neobehaviorism and it’s historical origins
Resulted when behaviorism was combined with logical positivism.
Tend to believe the following:
- if theory is used, it must be used in ways demanded by logical positivism
- all theoretical terms must be operationally defined
- nonhuman animals should be used as research subjects for two reasons: relevant variables are easier to control than they are for human subjects, and perceptual and learning process is occurring in nonhuman animals differ only in degree from those processes in humans; therefore, the information gained from nonhuman animals can be generalized to humans
- The learning process is of prime importance because it is the primary mechanism by which organisms adjust to changing environments
Created a brand of behaviorism that used mental constructs and emphasized purposive behavior. Although he employed many intervening variables, his most important was the cognitive map
Edward Chace Tolman
According to Tolman, a small segment of behavior such as a reflex or a habit that is isolated for study
Molecular behavior
According to Tolman, behavior that is directed toward some goal and that terminates when the goal is attained
Purposive behavior. He called purposive behavior molar behavior to contrast it with molecular behavior.
The type of behaviorism Tolman pursued, which emphasizes molar rather than molecular behavior
Purposive behaviorism
Describe Tolman’s use of rats in his research
Well teaching comparative psychology, his interest was stimulated in the rat as an experimental subject. He saw the use of rats as a way of guarding against even the possibility of indirect introspection that could occur if humans were used as experimental subjects. He dedicated his book purposive behavior to the white rat
According to Tolman, events believed to occur between environmental and behavioral events. Although they cannot be observed directly, they are thought to be causally related to behavior. Hull’s habit strength and Tolman’s cognitive map are examples
Intervening variables
By introducing the use of intervening variables, Tolman brought abstract scientific theory into psychology.
To account fully for the behavior, one has to know both the environmental events and the internal or intervening events that they initiate. The most important intervening variables he postulated are cognitive are mental in nature
According to Tolman, an expectancy that occurs during the early stages of learning
Hypothesis
According to Tolman, the apparent pondering of behavioral choices in a learning situation
Vicarious trial and error
According to Tolman, a hypothesis that has been tentatively confirmed
Expectancy
According to Tolman, an expectation that experience has consistently confirmed
Belief
According to Tolman, the mental representation of the environment
Cognitive map
An awareness of all possibilities in a situation
For Tolman, hypotheses, expectations, beliefs, and finally a cognitive map intervene between experience and behavior. Rather than just describing an organisms behavior, these intervening variables were thought to explain it
According to Tolman, the verification of a hypothesis, expectancy, or belief
Confirmation