Chapter 13: Connections between SDEs and PDE Flashcards

1
Q

Consider F(t, x) where t ∈ [0, T] and x ∈ R. We will begin by looking at the partial differential
equation
∂F/∂t (t, x) + α(t, x) ∂F/∂x (t, x) + (1/2)β(t, x)^2 ∂^2F/∂x^2 (t, x) = 0 *

F(T, x) = Φ(x) **

A

Consider F(t,x), where t in [0,T] and x in R

(t is time and x is space)

which solves

∂F/∂t (t, x) + α(t, x) ∂F/∂x (t, x) + (1/2)β(t, x)^2 ∂^2F/∂x^2 (t, x) = 0 *

F(T, x) = Φ(x) **
TERMINAL BOUNDARY CONDITION

Here, α(t, x) and β(t, x) are (deterministic) continuous functions, and Φ(x) is a function known as the boundary condition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

NOTE

SOLVING

∂F/∂t (t, x) + α(t, x) ∂F/∂x (t, x) + (1/2)β(t, x)^2 ∂^2F/∂x^2 (t, x) = 0 *

F(T, x) = Φ(x) **
TERMINAL BOUNDARY CONDITION

A

Let (X_t) be a stochastic process satisfying
dX_u= α(u, X_u) + β(u, X_u) dB_u

we will use X to solve *
and want to solve above where we look over [t,T] abd initial condition will be setting X_t=x

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

notation
E_{t,x}
P_{t,x}

A

E_{t,x}
P_{t,x}

mean exp or probability where condition imposed at time t(X_t=x)

We will need to consider solutions to this SDE where we vary the initial value of x, and also the time at which the ‘initial’ value occurs. For given x in R and t in [0,T] we write these above to specify X represents a sol of * with initial cond X_t=x

we are e then interested in Xu during time u ∈ [t, T]). We will continue to use P and
E to denote starting at time 0 with unspecified initial value X0. 0 less than t less than T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

chapter 13; Notation F(t,x)

A

t is time in [0,T}
space x in R

interested when this solves
∂F/∂t (t, x) + α(t, x) ∂F/∂x (t, x) + (1/2)β(t, x)^2 ∂^2F/∂x^2 (t, x) = 0 *

with bc
F(T, x) = Φ(x) **

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Chapter 13; X

interested in X

A

X is a stochastic process which satisfies

dX_u= α(u, X_u) + β(u, X_u) dB_u

for the two functions defined in *

We see that X solves *

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

LEMMA 13.1.2

if F solves * and **

A

Suppose that F is a solution of

∂F/∂t (t, x) + α(t, x) ∂F/∂x (t, x) + (1/2)β(t, x)^2 ∂^2F/∂x^2 (t, x) = 0 *
and
F(T, x) = Φ(x) **

and also that
β(t, Xt) = ∂F/∂x (t, Xt)
is in H^2

Then, F(t, x) = E_{t,x} [Φ(X_T )]
for all x ∈ R and t ∈ [0, T].

proof by itos formula using f(t,x) = F(t,x) functions α and β

we write in integral form for integrals over t to T:
F(T, XT ) = F(t, X_t) + INTEGRAL_{t,T}
[β(u, X_u) (∂F/∂x) (u, Xu) ] dB_u.

we now take Expectation E_{t,x}:
RHS as ito integrals are 0 mean martingales
LHS
E_{t,x}[F(T,X_T)] = E_{t,x}[F(t,X,t)]
notation rhs means F(T,X_T) =Φ(X_T) by 13.2
lhs means X_t=x

E{t,x} [ Φ(x_T)] = E_{t,x}[F(t,x)] = F(t,x)

as F is a deterministic function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The PDE that will turn out to be important for option pricing is

FEYMAN-KAC

A

∂F/∂t (t, x) + α(t, x) ∂F/∂x (t, x) + (1/2)β(t, x)^2 ∂^2F/∂x^2 (t, x) − rF(t, x)
= 0 (13.4)

F(T, x) = Φ(x) (13.5)

where α, β, Φ are as before and r is a deterministic constant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Lemma 13.1.3
FEYMAN-KAC
13.4 and 13.5 not * and **

A

Suppose that F is a solution of
(13.4) and (13.5),

and also that

β(t, Xt) (∂F/∂x)(t, Xt)
is in H^2

Then,
F(t, x) = e^(−r(T −t))E({t,x} [Φ(X_T )] (13.6)

for all x ∈ R and t ∈ [0, T].

Remark 13.1.4 Setting r = 0 in Lemma 13.1.3 gets us back to the statement of Lemma 13.1.2.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Lemma 13.1.3
FEYMAN-KAC
13.4 and 13.5 not * and **
PROOF

Suppose that F is a solution of
(13.4) and (13.5),

and also that

β(t, Xt) (∂F/∂x)(t, Xt)
is in H^2

Then,
F(t, x) = e^(−r(T −t))E({t,x} [Φ(X_T )] (13.6)

for all x ∈ R and t ∈ [0, T].

A

Apply itos to Z_T=e^(−rt)F(t,X_t)

set f(t,x)=e^(−rt)F(t,X_t)

dZ_t=
= e^{−rt} [−rF + e^{−rt} ∂F/∂t + α(t, Xt) ∂F/∂x + (1/2)β(t, Xt)^2 ∂^2F/∂x^2]dt
+
e^−rt β(t, Xt) ∂F/∂x dB_t

We know that F satisfies * and so first term =0

dZ_t= e^−rt β(t, Xt) ∂F/∂x dB_t

in integral form:

e^{−rT}F(T, XT ) =
e^{−rt}F(t, Xt) + ∫_{t,T} [e^{−ru} (∂F/∂x) (u, X_u) dB_u] .

Z_T- z_t= ∫_{t,T} [β(t, Xt) (∂F/∂x) (u, X_u) dB_u]

2nd term on the right is an ito integral and hence has mean 0 . Taking exp E_{t,x} :
E_{t,x}[e^{−rT}F(T, X_T )]
= E_{t,x}[e^{−rt}F(t, Xt)]

At time T F is bc:
F(T,X_T)=Φ(X_T )
and at time t deterministic:
X_t=x

Under E_{t,x} we have X_t = x, so F(t, X_t) = F(t, x) which is deterministic. We obtain that
e^{−r(T −t)}E_{t,x} [F(T, X_T )] = F(t, x) and using (13.5) then gives us
e^{−r(T −t)}E_{t,x} [Φ(X_T )] = F(t, x)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

F(t, x) = e^(−r(T −t))E({t,x} [Φ(X_T )] (13.6) and

isk-neutral valuation formula

A

We can start to see the connection to finance emerging in (13.6). If we set t = 0, we obtain
F(0, x) = e
−rTE0,x[Φ(XT )]
which bears a resemblance to the risk-neutral valuation formula we found in Chapter 5.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

EXAMPLE 13.1.6
In cases where we can solve (13.3), we can use the Feynman-Kac formula to find explicit solutions to PDEs. For example, consider

∂F/∂t (t, x) + (1/2)σ^2 ∂^2F/∂x^2(t, x) = 0

with bc
F(T, x) = x^2

Here, σ ≥ 0 is a deterministic constant and t, x ∈ R.

A
We have that 
α(t, x) = 0, 
β(t, x) = σ (both constants), 
and 
Φ(x) = x^2
r=0

From Lemma 13.1.2 the solution is given by

F(t, x) = E_{t,x}[X^2_T]
where
dXu = 0 du + σ dBu
= σ dBu.

This means that
X_T = X_t + σ ∫_{t,T} dBu
= Xt + σ(B_T − B_t).

Therefore
F(t,x) = E_{t,x} [ (X_t + σ(B_T − B_t))^2]
= E[(x + σ(B_T − B_t))^2]
= E[x^2 + σ^2(B_T − B_t)^2 + 2xσ(B_T − B_t)]
= x^2 + σ^2(T − t).

Here, we use that Xt = x under Et,x and that
B_T − B_t ∼ B_T −t ∼ N(0, T − t) by def of BM

See exercises 13.1 and 13.2 for further examples of this method.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

MARKOV PROPERTY
want to find the present value distribution of steps don’t need to know the values before the time

giving a process (X_u) we want to make guesses about the properties of X_T - not necessarily values

A

notation E_{t,x}[…]
(start process (X) at time t with run from time t to T, take expectation)

along with conditional expectation allows us to express the Markov Property

Suppose we have a stochastic process (F_t), and waited until time t so info is visible and given by curly F_t

We want to make a best guesses for some information about X_T where T > t. In symbols this means that we have chosen some (deterministic) function Φ and we are interested in
E[Φ(XT )| Ft].
In principle, we have access to all the information in Ft- information on what happened up to including time t

E_{t,Xt}[Φ(X_T )]. - we only know the value at specific time- value X_t

However, in many cases it holds that
E[Φ(XT )| Ft] =
E_{t,Xt}[Φ(X_T )].

(13.7)

ie replaced by as we only need that info

*we say that the markov property holds for (X_u) if hold for all Φ, t T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

lemma 13.2.1

Markov property

A

Lemma 13.2.1 All Ito processes satisfy the Markov property.

In particular, the formula for GBM satisfies the MP

E[Φ(X_T )| Ft] = E_{t,Xt}[Φ(X_T )].

holds when X is Brownian motion, and when X is geometric Brownian motion.

that is it’s constantly forgetting the past and to predict the future you only need the present for the best guess

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly