Chapter 12: Stochastic differential equation Flashcards

1
Q

Making sense of:

Xt = X0 + ∫{0,t} F_u du + ∫{0,t} G_u dB_t

A
  • B_t is Brownian motion
  • We allow cases in which the stochastic processes F_u and G_u depend on X_u e.g F_u = X_t^2
  • X_t is an unknown stochastic process

eq called STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS SDEs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

SOLVING SDES

A

STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS SDEs
solving Xt = X0 + ∫{0,t} F_u du + ∫{0,t} G_u dB_t

Solution involves finding X_t in terms of B_t

  • If F_t and G_t only dep on t and B_t then SDE is just an explicit formula for a solution to it
  • if F_t and or G_t dep on X_t ( e.g F_t=2X_t) then its no an explicit formula and no guarantee a sol for X_t exists
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

SDE
INTEGRAL FORM

STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL FORM

A
INTEGRAL FORM
X_t - X_0 =  ∫_{0,t}  F_u du + ∫_{0,t} G_u dB_t
commonly write
STOCHASTIC DIFFERENTIAL FORM
dXt = Ft dt + Gt dBt
  • drop integral signs
  • converting from stoch diff to int form we add limits (any as long as consistent)
    X_t - X_v = ∫{v,t} F_u du + ∫{v,t} G_u dB_t
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

DF 12.0.2

Stochastic process ito in stoch diff form

A

A stochastic process Xt is an Ito process if it satisfies
dXt = Ft dt + Gt dBt

for some G ∈ H^2 and a continuous adapted stochastic process F.

updated in new form*

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

NOTATION

ito process (X_t)and stoch process (H_t)

A

Given an Ito process Xt , as in Definition 12.0.2, and a
stochastic process H_t , we will often write
dZ_t = H_t dX_t

which (as a definition) we interpret to mean that
dZ_t = H_t(F_t dt + G_t dBt)
= H_tF_t dt + H_tG_t dB_t

In integral form this represents
Zt = Z0 + ∫{0,t} H_uF_u du + ∫{0,t} H_uG_u dB_u.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

LEMMA 12.1.1 ITOS FORMULA

A

Suppose that, for t ∈ R and x ∈ R, f(t, x) is a deterministic function that is differentiable in t and twice differentiable in x.
Then Zt = f(t, Xt) is an Ito
process and
dZt =
[∂f/∂t (t, X_t) + F_t ∂f/∂x(t, X_t) + (1/2)G^2_t ∂^2f/ ∂x^2 (t, X_t).dt + G_t ∂f/∂x(t, Xt) dB_t

*notation:
usually:
dZt = {∂f/∂t + F_t∂f/∂x+ (1/2)G^2_t ∂^2f/∂x^2 } dt + G_t ∂f/∂x dB_t

sometimes:
dZt = {∂f/∂t +(1/2)G^2_t ∂^2f/∂x^2 } dt + ∂f/∂x dX_t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

EXAMPLE 12.1.2.

Let us apply Ito’s formula to calculate dZ_t where Zt = B^2_t

A
Z_t= f(t,B_t)
f(t,x)=x^2
∂f/∂t =0
∂f/∂x = 2x
∂^2 f/∂x^2 =2

B_t is an ito process satisfying dB_T = 0 dt + 1 dB_t

From Ito’s formula:

dZ_t = ( 0 +(0)(2B_t) + 0.5(1^2)(2))dt + (1)(2B_t)dB_t
= 1 dt + 2B_t dB_t

in integral form:

Z_t = Z_0 + ∫_{0,t} 1 du + 2B_u dB_u

rearranged

∫_{0,t} B_u dB_u = B^2_t/2 - t/2

IMPORTANT
*B^2t - t = ∫{0,t} 2B_u dB_u

we proved RHS was martingale ( we have that LHS is ito integral and thus its a martingale and thus RHS is a martingale) and now we have this w/o using conditional expectations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

EXAMPLE 12.1.3
Suppose that X satisfies
dX_t = µ dt + σ dB_t, where µ ∈ R and σ bigger than 0 are deterministic constants. Let Zt = X_te^t

We want to find dZt

constant stoch processes

A

dZ_t =(X_te^t + (µ)(e^t) + (1/2)(σ^2)(0))dt + (σ)(e^t) dBt

Z_t = f(t, X_t) where f(t,x) = xe^t
F_t=µ
G_t= σ

by ITO’s formula

(Xt + µ) e^t dt + σe^t dBt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

EXAMPLE 12.1.2.

Let us apply Ito’s formula to calculate dZ_t where Zt = B^2_t

NOTES

A

IMPORTANT
*B^2t - t = ∫{0,t} 2B_u dB_u

we proved RHS was martingale ( we have that LHS is ito integral and thus its a martingale and thus RHS is a martingale) and now we have this w/o using conditional expectations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

EXAMPLE 12.1.4

Suppose that we want to calculate E[B^4_t]

A

Define Z_t= B^4_t and use itos formula:

Z_t = f(t,B_t) where f(t,x) = x^4

B_t is also an ito process with
dB_t = 0 dt + 1 dBt. So,

dZt =[0 + (0)(4B^3_t) + (1/2)(1^2)(12B^2_t)]
dt + (1)(4B^3_t) dBt
= 6B^2_t dt + 4B^3_t dBt

in integral form:
Z_t = Z_0 + ∫_{0,t} 6B^2u du + ∫{0,t} 4B^3_u dBu

taking expectations:
E[Z_t] =  E[∫_{0,t}6B^2_u du]  + E[∫_{0,t} 4B^3_u dBu]
(lemma to swap E and int 11.4.2 and ito integral is zero-mean martingale 11.2.1)
=
∫_{0,t} E[6B^2_u du]  + 0  
=  ∫_{0,t} 6u .du
= 6t^2/2
= 3t^2

The result we have obtained matches that from exercise 10.4, but with much less work!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Geometric Brownian motion

A

dXt = αXt dt + σXt dBt

where α ∈ R and σ ≥ 0 are deterministic constants. The parameter α is known as the drift, and σ is known as the volatility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

GBM
dXt = αXt dt + σXt dBt

*consider σ=0 and solve

A

dx_t=αx_t dt

in int form:
x_t - x_0 = ∫_{0,t} αx_u du

By FTOC:
dx/dt = αx ODE

To solve: sub z= log x
(we assume a sol exists and never negative)

dz/dt = (dz/dt)(du.dt) = (1/x) αx = α
int gives sol
z_t = αt+ C
e^z_t = C’e^{αt}

So we try substitution z=log(X)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

dXt = αXt dt + σXt dBt

solving with z=log(X)

A

dZ_t = {(0) + (αX_t)(1/X_t) + 0.5 (σX_t)^2 (-1/X_62_t)dt + σX_t (1/X_t)dB_t

We saw σ=0 case solved

Z_t = f(t,x_t) where f(t,x)= log(x)

∂f/∂t =0
∂f/∂x = 1/x
∂^f/∂x^2 = -1/x^2

(α − 1/2 σ^2)dt + σ dBt
Integral form:

Z_t = Z_0 + ∫{0,t} (α − 1/2 σ^ 2)du + ∫{0,t} σ dBt

= Z_0 + (α − 1/2 σ^2)t + σBt

Z_t=log X_T so
Xt = X0 exp((α −1/2 σ^2)t + σBt)

As we said, this was all based on the assumption that a (strictly positive) solution exists

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

SOL OF GBM for times t and T

A

X_T = X_t exp((α −1/2 σ^2)(T − t) + σ(BT − Bt))

*see everything happened uo to time t and make predictions about stock prices until time T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

CONSIDER SDE
dXt = σtXt dBt
where (σ_t) is an adapted stochastic process
solve

A

To solve we use same idea as before and set Z_t = log (X_t)

dZ_T= {0 + (0)(1/X_t) + 0.5(σtX_t)(X^2_t)} dt + (σ_tX_t)(1/X_t)dB_t

= -0.5 σ^t dt + σ_t dB_t

Z_t- Z_0 = ∫{0,t} -0.5 σ^u du
+∫
{0,t}σ_u dB_u
(we cant do as we dont know anything about stoch process σ_t)

X_t = X_0 exp( ∫{0,t} -0.5 σ^u du
+∫
{0,t}σ_u dB_u)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

DEF 12.3.2

The stochastic exp of the process σ_t

don’t need to remember we only use result

A

2 The stochastic exponential of the process σt is
E_σ(t) =
exp( ∫{0,t} σ_u dB_u) -
0.5 ∫
{0,t}σ^u du

Of course, we have shown that Eσ(t) solves dXt = σtXt dBt , and noting that Eσ(0) = 1 we thus have
Eσ(t) = 1 + ∫_{0,t} σuEσ(u) dBu.

17
Q

Note that this section is off-syllabus However, since it covers a result that we will need in our analysis of the Black-Scholes model, it will still be covered in lectures.

Theorem 12.3.3 (Martingale Representation Theorem)

A

*ito integrals are martingales, so given a martingale M_t we rewrite in terms of integrals of some stochastic process

Theorem 12.3.3 (Martingale Representation Theorem)

Let Mt ∈ H2
be a continuous martingale. Fix T ∈ (0, ∞).

Then there exists a stochastic process h_t ∈ H^2
such that
M_t = M_0 + ∫_{0,t} h_u dBu
for all t ∈ [0, T].

(only works for finite time: martingales in cont time equiv to ito integrals)

*does not give us formula for (h_t) only its existence