Chapter 13 Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Mimicry

A

Mimicry is the automatic imitation of others’ behaviors, enhancing social bonding. Key aspects include:

Copying Behavior: Imitating gestures, speech, or expressions.
Chameleon Effect: Subconsciously blending in to make interactions smoother.
Nonconscious Mimicry: Unintentional mimicry that builds rapport.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ostracism

A

Ostracism is a strong form of social pressure involving exclusion or ignoring individuals, often leading to feelings of isolation and impacting self-esteem and well-being.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Group Dynamics
Social Loafing
Social facilitation

A

Group Dynamics
Social Loafing
- When individuals put less effort into tasks when working with others
Social facilitation
- When one’s performance is affected by the presence of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

The Asch Experiments: Conformity

A

Conformity: Adopting actions or attitudes due to real or perceived group pressure.

Normative Influence: Conforming to fit in and be accepted, avoiding rejection.

Informational Influence: Conforming because the group’s perspective is seen as informative or helpful in understanding a situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Follow-up Studies on Conformity and Group Influence:

A

Conformity and Group Size: Conformity increases with group size, reaching its peak when there are at least three people. Larger groups don’t significantly increase conformity further.

Power of Individuals: A single dissenter—someone who disagrees with the group—can significantly reduce conformity, empowering others to express their true beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The Bystander Effect:
Diffusion of Responsibility

A

The Bystander Effect:
a social phenomenon where individuals are less likely to help in an emergency when others are present, as they assume someone else will intervene. This effect gained attention following the story of Kitty Genovese, a woman who was attacked in New York City while bystanders reportedly did not intervene. Her case highlighted how the presence of others can reduce the likelihood of any one person stepping forward to help.
Diffusion of Responsibility: In groups, individuals feel less personal responsibility to act, assuming others will step in.

If ten people watch someone choking on a bus but do nothing, this is an example of diffusion of responsibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Researchers describe two types of social influences that lead people to conform:

and Brain Area

A

Normative Influence: The pressure to conform to gain social acceptance and avoid rejection.

Informational Influence: The influence of others’ opinions, which people may accept as useful information in uncertain situations.

When people resist conforming to a group’s incorrect judgments, the amygdala becomes active. This area is associated with processing emotional responses, suggesting that resisting group pressure may evoke feelings of discomfort or stress.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Pluralistic Ignorance:

A

occurs when individuals mistakenly believe that their own thoughts or beliefs differ from those of the group, so they conform to what they think is the group norm, even if that norm is not widely held. This can lead to inaction in ambiguous situations, as people look to others for cues on how to behave.

People may conform outwardly to perceived social norms even if they internally disagree, mistakenly thinking others support those norms. This can discourage action in ambiguous situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Main Outcome of Milgram’s Study:

A

The Milgram study revealed that ordinary people are often willing to obey authority figures even when instructed to perform actions that conflict with their morals, demonstrating how powerful authority can be in shaping behavior.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

“The Banality of Evil”:

A

Sociologist Hannah Arendt used this phrase to describe how ordinary people can commit horrific acts not out of malice, but due to a tendency to follow orders or conform to roles without critical thought. This concept is related to Milgram’s research, as his study demonstrated how regular individuals could perform harmful actions simply by complying with an authority figure’s directives, highlighting how obedience can lead to morally questionable behavior.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Two Types of Cognitive Processes:

ex and im

A

Explicit Processes: Conscious, deliberate, and effortful mental activities, such as logical reasoning or decision-making that we are aware of and can control.

Implicit Processes: Automatic, unconscious mental activities, like intuition or habits, that occur without deliberate thought and influence behavior subtly.

Dual-Process Models: Theories suggesting that human thinking operates through both explicit and implicit processes, with one pathway for deliberate reasoning and another for automatic responses, allowing flexibility in how we process information.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Person Perception and Schemas

A

Person Perception: The mental processes through which we categorize and form judgments about others, helping us navigate social interactions.

Schemas: Cognitive structures that organize information and relationships, shaping our expectations and interpretations of people and situations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Projecting the Self onto Others:
False Consensus
Naïve Realism:
Self-Serving Biases:

A

Projecting the Self onto Others: This involves projecting our beliefs and attitudes onto others, often through false consensus and naïve realism.

False Consensus: The tendency to assume that others share our views, beliefs, or behaviors, projecting our self-concept onto the social world.

Naïve Realism: The assumption that our perception of reality is objective and accurate, while others’ differing views are biased or incorrect.

Self-Serving Biases: These biases help us maintain a positive self-image, leading us to attribute successes to our abilities or effort and failures to external factors. This need to feel good about ourselves can influence how we interpret events and interact with others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Attribution Theory:
Situational (External) Attribution:
Dispositional (Internal) Attribution:

A

Attribution Theory: This theory explains how people interpret and explain the causes of their own and others’ behavior by attributing it either to external (situational) or internal (dispositional) factors.

Situational (External) Attribution: Assigning the cause of behavior to external factors, such as the environment or context (e.g., time of day, surrounding environment, interactions with others).

Dispositional (Internal) Attribution: Attributing behavior to personal traits or motives (e.g., intelligence, personality, gender, ethnicity).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Fundamental Attribution Error:

A

The Fundamental Attribution Error is the tendency to overemphasize personal characteristics (dispositional factors) and underestimate situational factors when interpreting others’ behaviors.
Example: Assuming someone is rude because they are naturally inconsiderate, without considering they might be having a stressful day.

Cultural Phenomenon: This error is more common in individualistic cultures, where personal traits are often emphasized over contextual influences. In contrast, collectivist cultures are more likely to consider situational factors, leading to fewer instances of this attribution bias.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Difference Between Internal and External Attributions:

A

Internal Attributions: These assign the cause of behavior to personal traits, abilities, or motives within the individual.

Example 1: Believing someone succeeded in their job because of their intelligence.

External Attributions: These attribute behavior to situational or environmental factors outside the individual.

Example 1: Explaining a coworker’s poor performance due to a distracting work environment.

17
Q

Ingroups and Outgroups:

A

Ingroups: Groups to which we belong and identify with, such as family, friends, or social circles.
Outgroups: Groups to which we don’t belong and often see as different from or even opposed to our ingroups.

18
Q

The Implicit Association Test (IAT)

A

Measures the speed of positive and negative associations with a target group.
Faster responses to stereotypical pairings (e.g., male/leader or female/caregiver) reveal implicit biases.

Brain Activity:
Neuroimaging techniques like fMRI and PET scans identify brain areas active during stereotype formation and prejudice-related thoughts.

19
Q

The Contact Hypothesis

A

The Contact Hypothesis proposes that increased contact between members of different groups can reduce stereotypes and prejudice. When people from diverse groups interact in cooperative, equal-status settings, they can form more positive attitudes and break down prejudiced beliefs.

20
Q

Group-Serving Bias:

A

Group-Serving Bias:
Definition: The tendency to make favorable attributions for the behaviors of in-group members while making unfavorable attributions for out-group members.
Example: Explaining the success of in-group members as due to talent and hard work, but attributing the same success for out-group members to luck or unfair advantage.

21
Q

Just-World Hypothesis:

A

Definition: A belief that the world is fair, and people get what they deserve.
Positive outcome: Encourages belief in fairness and justice.
Negative outcome: Leads to victim blaming when assumptions of fairness are challenged.
Example: Blaming a victim of theft for leaving their door unlocked, instead of focusing on the perpetrator’s wrongdoing.

22
Q

Persuasion: Changing Attitudes Through Communication
Elaborative Likelihood Model (ELM):

A

Central Route:

Persuasion through logical, well-reasoned content.
Effective for audiences willing to engage deeply with the message.
Example: Detailed data on climate impacts persuading policy-makers.

Peripheral Route:

Persuasion through presentation style, emotional appeals, or superficial cues.
Effective for less-engaged audiences.
Example: A visually striking advertisement encouraging eco-friendly behavior.

23
Q

Preaching vs. Flip-Flopping: One-Sided vs. Two-Sided Messages

A

One-Sided Messages:

Focus exclusively on supporting one perspective.
Best for audiences already aligned with the message.

Two-Sided Messages:

Acknowledge opposing viewpoints while presenting stronger arguments for your position.
Seen as more trustworthy and credible.
Supported by Attitude Inoculation: Exposing audiences to weak counterarguments strengthens their resistance to persuasion.

24
Q

The Attitude-Behavior Feedback Loop
Cognitive Dissonance Theory:

A

When actions and beliefs conflict, people change one to align with the other to reduce discomfort.
Examples:
Doomsday Cults: Members rationalize failed predictions to maintain belief.
Lying for $1 vs. $20: People justify actions more when external incentives are minimal (e.g., $1) compared to significant incentives ($20).

25
Q

Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM) of Persuasive Communication

A

Definition: A model explaining how persuasive messages are processed through two routes:
Central Route: Persuasion based on the quality and strength of the arguments. Requires the audience to think critically about the content.
Peripheral Route: Persuasion based on superficial cues like attractiveness, authority, or presentation style, rather than content.

26
Q

Construal-Level Theory of Persuasion
Definition:

A

Psychological distance (time, space, social, or hypothetical scenarios) affects how people process information.
Near (low-level construal): Concrete and specific information is more persuasive.
Far (high-level construal): Abstract and general arguments are more effective.

27
Q

Attitude Inoculation, Door-in-the-Face Technique, Foot-in-the-Door Technique

A

Attitude Inoculation
Definition:
Exposing individuals to weak counterarguments strengthens their resistance to stronger persuasive attempts later.
Real-World Example:
Anti-smoking campaigns showing minor peer pressure scenarios to build resistance against future persuasion to smoke.

Door-in-the-Face Technique
Definition:
Start with a large request likely to be refused, then follow with a smaller, more reasonable request.
Example: Asking for a $500 donation, then asking for $50 instead.

Foot-in-the-Door Technique
Definition:
Start with a small request to gain compliance, then escalate to a larger request.
Example: Asking someone to sign a petition, then asking them to volunteer time.