Chapter 11 Flashcards
Promisor
A person who makes a promise
Promisee
A person to whom a promise is made
Contract
An agreement that can be enforced in court; formed by two or more parties, each of whom agrees to perform or to refrain from performing some act now or in the future
Objective theory of contracts
A theory under which the intent to form a contract will be judged by outward, objective facts (what the party said when entering the contract, how the party acted or appeared, and the circumstances surrounding the transaction) as interpreted by a reasonable person, rather than by the party’s own secret, subjective intentions
Requirements of a valid contract
Agreement
Consideration
Contractual capacity
Legality
Defenses to the enforceability of a contract
Voluntary consent
Form
What governs all contracts
Common law except when it has been modified or replaced by statutory law or administrative agency regulations
- (usually for the sale and lease of goods)
Offeror
A person who makes an offer
Offeree
A person to whom an offer is made
Bilateral contract
A type of contract that arises when a promise is given in exchange for a return promise
Unilateral contract
A contract that results when an offer can only be accepted by the offeree’s performance
“A promise for an act”
- contests, lotteries, etc
Formal contracts
A contract that by law requires a specific form, such as being executed under seal to be valid
- negotiable instruments (checks, drafts, promissory notes, bills of exchange, certificates of deposit)
Informal contracts
A contract that does not require a specified form or formality in order to be valid
Express contract
A contract in which the terms of the agreement are fully and explicitly states in words, oral or written.
- signed lease for a house
Implied contract
A contract formed in whole or in part from the conduct of the parties (as opposed to an express contract)
- also known as implied in fact contract
1. Plaintiff furnished some service/property
2. Plaintiff expected to be paid for it and the defendant knew that payment was expected
3. Defendant had a chance to reject the services/property and did not