Chapter 10: Performance Management Flashcards
Performance appraisal
evaluating an employee’s current and/or past performance relative to his or her performance standards.
Performance management
The process encompassing all activities related to improving employee performance, productivity, and effectiveness
Performance management includes:
goal setting, pay for performance, training and development, career management, and disciplinary action
There are three major purposes of performance management:
1) it aligns employee actions with strategic goals,
2) it is a vehicle for culture change,
3) it provides input into other HR systems such as development and remuneration
Which elements of performance appraisals are used most by Canadian organizations?
Premature,
QUIZ QUESTION
Individual objectives and goals.
The performance management process contains five steps: what are they?
1) Defining performance expectations and goals
2) Providing ongoing feedback and coaching
3) Conducting performance appraisals and evaluation discussions
4) Determining performance rewards and / consequences
5) Conducting development and career opportunities discussions
There are five reasons to appraise subordinates’ performance. what are they?
First, most employers base pay, promotion, and retention decisions on the employee’s appraisal
Appraisals play a central role in the employer’s performance management process
The appraisal lets the manager and subordinate develop a plan for correcting any deficiencies, and to reinforce the subordinate’s strengths.
Appraisals provide an opportunity to review the employee’s career plans in light of his or her exhibited strengths and weaknesses.
Finally, appraisals enable the supervisor to identify if there is a training need and the remedial steps required.
Over the last 30 years there has been more recognition that job performance is a multidimensional construct which can be split into what has become widely acknowledged as ______ versus ______performance
task
contextual
Task performance
An individual’s direct contribution to their job-related processes
Contextual performance
An individual’s indirect contribution to the organization by improving the organizational, social, and psychological behaviours that contribute to organizational effectiveness beyond those specified for the job
Coaching
defined as a process for improving work performance in a frequent contact, hands-on process aimed at helping employees improve performance and capabilities.
Electronic performance monitoring (EPM)
Having supervisors electronically monitor the amount of computerized data an employee is processing per day and thereby his performance
Formal Appraisal Discussions
An interview in which the supervisor and employee review the appraisal and make plans to remedy deficiencies and reinforce strengths
There are three basic types of formal appraisal discussions, each with its own objectives: what are they?
1) Satisfactory - promotable
2) Satisfactory - not promotable
3) Unsatisfactory - correctable versus uncorrectable
1) Satisfactory - promotable
Here, the person’s performance is satisfactory and there is a promotion ahead
The objective is to discuss the person’s career plans and to develop a specific action plan for the educational and professional development that the person needs to move to the next job
2) Satisfactory - not promotable
This interview is for employees whose performance is satisfactory but for whom promotion is not possible
The objective here is not to improve or develop the person but to maintain satisfactory performance.
3) Unsatisfactory - correctable versus uncorrectable
When the person’s performance is unsatisfactory but correctable, the interview objective is to lay out an action plan for correcting the unsatisfactory performance
If unsatisfactory and the situation uncorrectable, there is usually no need for any formal appraisal discussion because the person’s performance is not correctable anyway
There are three things to do in preparation for the interview what are they?
1) First, assemble the data
2) Next, prepare the employee
3) Finally, find a mutually agreeable time and place, and allow plenty of time for the interview
How to Conduct the Interview:
There are four things to keep in mind when conducting a formal appraisal discussion to ensure the feedback is constructive
Be direct and specific
Do not get personal
Encourage the person to talk
Develop an action plan
When a supervisor tells someone his or her performance is poor, the first reaction is often
Denial
The Performance Management Process
STEP 1: DEFINING PERFORMANCE EXPECTATIONS
STEP 2: PROVIDING ONGOING COACHING AND FEEDBACK
STEP 3: CONDUCT PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL AND EVALUATION DISCUSSION
STEP 4: DETERMINE PERFORMANCE REWARDS/CONSEQUENCES
STEP 5: CAREER DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION
Graphic Rating Scale
Simplest and most popular technique for appraising performance.
It lists traits (such as reliability) and a range of performance values (from unsatisfactory to outstanding) for each one
Alternation Ranking Method
Ranking employees from best to worst on a particular trait
Paired Comparison Method
Ranking employees by making a chart of all possible pairs of employees for each trait and indicating the better employee of the pair
Forced Distribution Method
Predetermined percentages of ratees are placed in various performance categories
Critical Incident Method
the supervisor keeps a log of desirable or undesirable examples or incidents of each employee’s work-related behaviour. Then, every six months or so, the supervisor and employee meet to discuss the latter’s performance by using the specific incidents as examples.
PIP
Performance improvement plan
Behaviourally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS)
combines the benefits of narratives, critical incidents, and quantified ratings by anchoring a series of quantified scales, one for each performance dimension, with specific behavioural examples of good or poor performance