Chapter 10 Flashcards
positive monotonic relationship
there is a positive relationship between the variables, but it is not a strictly positive linear relationship. An experiment with only two levels cannot yield such exact information.
Factorial designs
are experimental designs with more than one independent variable (or factor). In a factorial design, all levels of each independent variable are combined with all levels of the other independent variables. The simplest factorial design—known as a 2 × 2 (two by two) factorial design—has two independent variables, each having two levels.
The general format for describing factorial designs is
Number of levels of first IV x Number of levels of second IV x Number of levels of third IV
Factorial designs yield
two kinds of information. The first is information about the effect of each independent variable taken by itself: this is called the main effect of an independent variable. The second type of information is called an interaction.
In a design with two independent variables, there are
two main effects—one for each independent variable.
The second type of information is called an interaction. If there is an interaction between two independent variables, the effect of one independent variable depends on the particular level of the other variable. In other words, the effect that an independent variable has on the dependent variable depends on the
level of the other independent variable. Interactions are a new source of information that cannot be obtained in a
simple experimental design in which only one independent variable is manipulated.
One common type of factorial design includes both experimental (manipulated) and nonexperimental
(measured or nonmanipulated) variables. These designs—sometimes called IV × PV designs (i.e., independent variable by participant variable)—allow researchers to investigate how different types of individuals (i.e., participants) respond to the same manipulated variable.
These “participant variables” are personal attributes
such as age, ethnicity, participant sex, personality characteristics, and clinical diagnostic category. You will sometimes see participant variables described as subject variables or attribute variables. This is only a difference of terminology.
The simplest IV × PV design includes one manipulated independent variable that has at least two levels
and one participant variable with at least
two levels
A statistical procedure called analysis of variance is used to
assess the statistical significance of the main effects
and the interaction in a factorial design. When a significant interaction occurs, the researcher must statistically evaluate the individual means.
When there is a significant interaction, the next step is to look at the
simple main effects
A simple main effect analysis examines
mean differences at each level of the independent variable.
the main effect of an independent variable averages across the levels of the other
independent variable; with simple main effects, the results are analyzed as if we had separate experiments at each level of the other independent variable.
mixed factorial design
a combination of (1) In an independent groups design, different participants are assigned to each of the conditions in the study and (2) in a repeated measures design, the same individuals participate in all conditions in the study.
In a 2 × 2 factorial design, there are four conditions. If we want a completely independent groups (between-subjects) design, a different group of participants will be assigned to each of the four conditions. The food intake modeling study illustrates a factorial design with different individuals in each of the conditions.
Suppose that you have planned a 2 × 2 design and want to have 10 participants in each condition; you will
need a total of 40 different participants
In a completely repeated measures (within-subjects) design, the same individuals will participate in all
conditions. Suppose you have planned a study on the effects of marijuana: One factor is marijuana (marijuana
treatment versus placebo control) and the other factor is task difficulty (easy versus difficult). In a 2 × 2
completely repeated measures design,
each individual would participate in all of the conditions by completing both easy and difficult tasks under both marijuana treatment conditions. If you wanted 10 participants in each condition, a total of 10 subjects would be needed
Mixed Factorial Design Using Combined Assignment
The third table in Figure 7 shows the number of participants needed to have 10 per condition in a 2 × 2 mixed factorial design. In this table, independent variable A is an independent groups variable. Ten participants are assigned to level 1 of this independent variable, and another 10 participants are assigned to level 2. Independent variable B is a repeated measures variable, however. The 10 participants
assigned to A1 receive both levels of independent variable B. Similarly, the other 10 participants assigned to A2 receive both levels of the B variable. Thus, a total of 20 participants are required.
One way to increase complexity is to
increase the number of levels of one or
more of the independent variables. A 2 × 3 design, for example, contains two independent variables:
Independent variable A has two levels, and independent variable B has three levels. Thus, the 2 × 3 design has six conditions.
THERE ARE TWO WAYS IN WHICH STATISTICS HELP US UNDERSTAND DATA COLLECTED IN RESEARCH INVESTIGATIONS.
First, statistics are used to describe the data.
Second, statistics are used to make inferences and draw conclusions about a population on the basis of sample
data.
The levels of nominal scale variables have
no numerical, quantitative properties. The levels are simply different categories or groups. Most independent variables in experiments are nominal—for example, as in an experiment that compares behavioral and cognitive therapies for depression. Variables such as eye color, hand dominance, college major, and marital status are nominal scale variables; left-handed and right-handed people differ from each other, but not in a quantitative way.
Variables with ordinal scale levels exhibit minimal quantitative distinctions. We can rank order the levels
of the variable being studied from lowest to highest. The clearest example of an ordinal scale is one that asks people to make rank-ordered judgments. For example, you might ask people to rank the most important problems facing your state today.
If education is ranked first, health care second, and crime third, you know the order but you do not know how strongly people feel about each problem: Education and health care may be deemed very close together in seriousness, with crime a distant third. With an ordinal scale, the intervals between items probably are not equal.