Chapter 1 Flashcards

1
Q

A hearing to determine if evidence will be admissible

A

Admissibility hearing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A system in which opposing arguments are presented to the party that makes the decision (trier of fact)

A

Adversarial system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A cradle-to-grave document that tracks evidence

A

Chain of custody

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Evidence that alone proves nothing directly; requires additional inference to prove a fact in dispute

A

Circumstantial evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Law that deals with disputes between parties

A

Civil law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

To assign an exhibit of evidence or other object to a group of like objects based on descriptors such as chemical and physical properties

A

Classifications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Associating two or more items or exhibit of evidence to one and only one possible source

A

Common source

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Law that deals with crimes committed against society as defined by law and administered by government

A

Criminal law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A court ruling on admissibility that among other things tasked judges with the role of gatekeeper for admissibility of scientific evidence and expert testimony

A

Daubert decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

An admissibility hearing based on the Daubert standards held to determine if scientific evidence and testimony is going to be admitted into the court proceeding

A

Daubert hearing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Three cases - Daubert, GE v. Joiner, and Kuhmo Tire related to the admissibility of scientific evidence; all three are federal cases

A

Daubert trilogy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Evidence known to a person directly by personal knowledge

A

Direct evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evidence that by itself excludes a person or a possibility

A

Exclusive evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

The question that directs a forensic analysis; the question that dictates how a piece of evidence is analyzed and what data is provided. The forensic question may or may not be the same as the scientific and legal questions

A

Forensic question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

A rule of admissibility of scientific evidence and expert testimony that relies on general acceptance by the Scientific community

A

Frye rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The role of the judge in regards to the admissibility of scientific evidence under the Daubert hearing

A

Gatekeeper

17
Q

Under the Frye decision, the criteria for admitting scientific evidence

A

General acceptance

18
Q

The second case in the Daubert trilogy; the ruling in the case stressed the need to weigh the relevancy of the data to the question at hand

A

General Electric v. Joiner (GE v. Joiner)

19
Q

An exhibit for which there is no prior knowledge or outward signs that point to its consumption. Forensic samples are often treated as general unknowns even if there is some prior knowledge

A

General unknown

20
Q

A term with various meanings in forensic science including linking a piece of evidence to a single source (such as a fingerprint to a person) or identification of a chemical compound using libraries and reference materials

A

Identification

21
Q

Evidence that by itself includes a person or a possibility

A

Inclusive evidence

22
Q

Linking a piece of evidence to a single source

A

Individualization

23
Q

The third decision in the Daubert trilogy; the ruling extended scope of Daubert and the judge’s gatekeeper role to all expert testimony, not just scientific

A

Kuhmo Tire v. Carmichael

24
Q

The question that is at the center of a case or court proceeding

A

Legal question

25
Q

That which has gone before; previous rulings and approaches made by courts and supported over time

A

Precedent

26
Q

In the forensic context, the applicability of the data or information to the question at hand

A

Relevancy

27
Q

In a court or legal proceeding, the person or persons that make the ultimate decisions; can be a judge or jury

A

Trier of fact

28
Q

Analytical testing that utilizes relatively large quantities of liquid reagents

A

Wet chemical methods