Chaney et al - Developmental area Flashcards

1
Q

What are behaviour therapy and behaviour modification based on?

A
  • Based on classical conditioning

- Based on operant conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What doesn’t necessarily improve with rising severity of illness?

A

Adherence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What did Watt et al propose would improve medical adherence in young asthmatics?

A

That a positive interplay of adherence considerations with aerosol output factors would improve medication adherence in young asthmatics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is operant conditioning?

A
  • It is a form of associative learning
  • Whereby, associations and connections are formed between stimuli and responses that didn’t exist before learning occurs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What does operant conditioning involve?

A

It involves learning through the consequences of behavioural responses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Who first investigated the principles of operant conditioning?

A

Thorndike

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What did he find?

A
  • Found that any response that led to desirable consequences was more likely to be repeated
  • Any response that led to undersirable consequences was less likely to be repeated - a principle which became known as the Law of Effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What was the aim of this study?

A
  • The aim of this study was to show that the use of a novel asthma spacer device, the ‘Funhaler’, which incorporated incentive toys isolated from the main inspiratory circuit by a valve whilst not compromising drug delivery
  • can provide positive reinforcement which leads to improved adherence in young asthmatics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What experimental method was used?

A

Field experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What was the experimental design that was used?

A

Repeated measures design

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the IV? (2)

A
  • Whether the child used a standard/small volume spacer device - The breath-A-Tech
  • Whether the child used a Funhaler
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the DV?

A

The amount of adherence to the prescribed medical regime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How many children were in the study? (gender)

A
  • 32 children

- 22 male, 10 female

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Where was the study conducted?

A

Conducted in the P’s home setting in Australia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

On average, how long had the children had asthma?

A

2.2 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How did the children’s parents get involved?

A
  • Helped (where necessary) in the use of the inhalers

- Completed questionnaires and took part in a phone interview

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What did the parents provide?

A

Provided informed consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What was the sampling technique?

A

Random sampling

19
Q

How were P’s recruited?

A

Recruited from clinics across a large area

20
Q

What happened first? (inhalers)

A
  • Firstly, a comparison was made between the aerosol output of the standard/small volume spacer device
  • 235ml Breath-A-Tech
  • 225ml Funhaler
21
Q

Was there any differences observed?

A

There was no significant differences observed

22
Q

What did that mean for the comparison?

A
  • The comparison was therefore complementary

- It indicated that the use of a Funhaler rather than a standard inhaler does not compromise drug delivery

23
Q

How were participants approached by the researcher?

A
  • Approached by the researcher at home
  • Before the Funhaler was even mentioned
  • They were interviewed with a questionnaire on their existing use of the inhaler
24
Q

How long were they given the funhaler?

25
What happened in the 2 weeks
They reported over the phone on an ad hoc basic to take snapshots of whether they had used the Funhaler the previous day
26
What were completed by the parents?
Matched questionaires
27
When were the matched questionnaires completed?
After sequential use of the Breath-A-Tech inhaler and the Funhaler
28
After sequential use of both inhalers, who visited them again?
Researchers
29
What happened when they were visited?
The parents were interviewed and they completed the matched questionnaires
30
What data was collected from the self-report?
- How easy each device was to use - Compliance of parents and children - Treatment attitudes
31
During the course of the study, when were the parents called?
- At random | - To find out whether they had attempted to medicate their child the day before
32
Why does the Fuhaler include features to the inhaler?
- To distract the attention of the child from the drug delivery event - Provide a means of self-reinforcing the use of effective technique
33
How was the funhaler made appealing?
- Isolates Incentive toys (spinner + whistle) - Design of the toys ensures sufficient inspiratory resistance to minimise entrainment of inspired air through the circuit toy - Design attempts to link optimal function of the toys deep breathing pattern conductive to effective medication - Design anticipates the potential for boredom - its modular arrangement would allow for the replacement of the incentive toy module with a range of other toys.
34
Did the use of the Funhaler associate with improved parental and child compliance?
Yes
35
When surveyed at random, how many children were found to have been medicated the previous day (FUNHALER)
81% (22/27)
36
What was this in comparison to?
- 59% of children (16/27) | - using the existing small volume spacer device
37
How many children took the recommended 4 or more cycles per aerosol delivery when using the funhaler?
- 80% - 24/30 - compared with 15/30 - 50% Standard/ Small volume spacer - 30% more
38
How many parents were always successful in medicating their child with the funhaler?
22/30
39
How many parents were always successful in medicating their child with the B-A-T?
3/30
40
What was the Funhaler associated with?
Fewer problems than when using the existing device
41
Is the Funhaler useful for management of young asthmatics?
Improved adherence combined with satisfactory delivery characteristics, suggest that the Funhaler may be useful for management of young asthmatics
42
What could the use of the Funhaler be translated to?
The use of the Funhaler could possibly be translated to improved measures of clinical outcome
43
How can the Funhaler improve health?
The use of functional incentive devices such as the Funhaler may improve the health of children
44
Is more research needed?
More research is recommended in the long term efficiency of this treatment