Ch 33 Agency Liability and Termination Flashcards
express authority
authority declared in clear, direct, and definite terms
equal dignity rule + 3 exceptions
IF CONTRACT BEING EXECUTED MUST BE IN WRIITNG, THEN AGENTS AUTHORITY MUST ALSO BE IN WRITING, else voidable at option of principal; contract regarded by law as mere offer
Elif: 1. executive offiver of corp normally can conduct ordinary busi transactions wo obtaining written auth fr corp; 2. when agent acts in presence of principal 3. when agents act of signing is merely a formalisty, X need written authy to sign
power of attorney
written doc and uaully notarized == when notary public (person auth to attest to authenticity of signatures) signs, dates, and imprints the doc with their seal of authority
special v general power of attorney
- permitting agent to perf specified acts only
2. permitting a* to transact all busi f prin*
implied authority
doing what is reasonably necessary to carry our express authority and accomplish the objectives of the agency
By custom or inferred from a*’s position
X contradict express authority
apparent authority
2 ways it happens
when principal, either word or action, causes a 3rd party reasonably to believe that the a* has authority to act, even enough agent has X express/implied authority
A PATTERN OF CONDUCT - usu~ how apparent authority comes into existence
(agency scope) emergency powers
when unforeseen emergency demands action by a* to protect/preserve property + rights o principal, but a* unable to communicate with principal
(agency scope) ratification
when prin* affirms responsibility for an agent’s unauthorizes act
Prin* bound to a’s act, and the act - treated as if it had been authorized by prin from outset
a* may be laible to 3rd party for misrep authy
(agency scope) ratification rqs (6)
agent must have acted on behalf o ID princ* who subsequently ratifies action
princ* must know all o material facts involved in transaction, else princ* can rescind contract
principal must affirm agent’s act in entirety
princ* must have legal capacity to auth transaction @ same time agent engages in act + @ time prinipal ratifies, 3rd party must also have legal capacity to engage in transaction
principal’s affirmation must occur before 3rd party withdraws fr transaction
princ* must observe same formalities when ratifying act as would been required to auth it formally
(agency) liability for contracts depends on
how prin* - classified + whether actions o a* - autho/unauth
disclosed principle
princ* whose ID - known by 3rd p* @ time contract - made by agent
partially disclosed principal
ID X known by 3rd party, but 3rd p* knows agent -/may be acting f principal @ time contract - made
undisclosed principal
ID totally unknown by 3rd party, no knowledge agent - act in agency capacity when contract made
authorized acts - disclosed, partially disclosed, undisclosed
Disclosed -> a* no contractual liability
Partially disclosed -> (mj~ states) a* party to contract -> 3rd party can hold a* liable f contractual nonperf
INDEMNIFICATION - When prin* ID is undisclosed + a* - forced to pay 3rd party, a* is [t] by principal, principal has duty to perf
PERFORMANCE - when ID revealed, 3rdd party can elect to hold either prin* or a* liable on contract OR undisclosed prin* can rq 3rd party to fulfill unless (1/3):
- Undisclosed prin* - expressly excluded as party in written contract
- Contract - negotiable instrument signed by agent w no indication o signing in a rep capacity
Perf o agent - personal to contract -> allow 3rd p* to refuse princ* perf
(unathorized acts) implied warranty
a* impliedly warrants that they have authority to enter contract on behalf of principal, agent liable