Ch 3 Flashcards
diagnosis
the classification of disorders by symptoms and signs
advantages of diagnosis (3)
- facilitates communication among professionals
- advances the search for causes and treatments
- cornerstone of clinical care- leads us to how we are going to treat/work with that client
reliability
consistency of measurement
types of reliability
- interrater reliability
- test-retest
- alternate forms
- internal consistency
interrater reliability
degree to which two observers agree on their observations
test-retest reliability
similarity of scores across repeated test administrations
alternate forms reliability
similarity of scores on tests that similar but not identical
Internal Consistency reliability
extent to which test items are related to one another
how is reliability measured?
on a scale of 0 - 1.0
validity
how well a test measures what it’s supposed to
can unreliable measures have good validity?
no, because a measure needs to be consistent in order to properly test what it’s supposed to
good reliability does not necessarily mean good validity, though.
types of validity
content validity
criterion validity
construct validity
content validity
extent to which a measure contains all of the pieces of the domain of interest
criterion validity
extent to which a measure is associated w. another measure (the criterion)
Neumonic- this old movie is like this old movie
forms of criterion validity
- concurrent
- two measures administered at same point in time
-predictive
- ability of the measure to predict
another variable measured at a future point in time
Neumonic: criterion collection- konkurro can predict the future
construct validity
the extent to which the test or measure accurately assesses what its supposed to- was the construct operationalized well?
- involves correlating multiple indirect measures of the attribute
construct
abstract concept or inferred attribute- needs to be operationalized
what is construct validity important for
important for validating our theoretical understanding of psychopathology
method for evaluating diagnostic categories
DSM-5
Diagnostic and Statistic Manual of Mental Disorders, published by American Psychiatric Association
first one published in 1952, current 2013
provides specific diagnostic criteria- symptoms for a given diagnosis
Emil Kraepelin
1856-1926
- early classification of psychiatry
- noted symptoms cluster as a syndrome
Neumonic: cluster of crepes as a syndrome, with medicine sprinkled on top
WHO and DSM
World Health Organization had International Classification of Disease (ICD), DSM not on same page of symptoms for a given disorder
over time, getting closer to a consensus
Multi-Axial System- 5 axial
- DSM-5 used 5-axis system
contained: - clinical disorders
- relevant physical disorders
- psychosocial and Environmental problems
- global assesment of fuctioning
Neumonic - 5 axes - clinical, body, social and environment, a globe assessing functioning
DSM-5 axes
uses 2 axis
- Psychiatric and Medical Diagnoses (combo of 1,2, and 3 from previous)
- Psychosocial and Contextual Factors (previously psychosocial and environmental problems)
what are the DSM-5’s diagnoses organized by?
symptoms- knowledge base not yet strong enough to organize by causes (etiology)
- chapters are organized to reflect patterns of comorbity and shared causes
features of DSM-5 to enhance cultural sensitivity (3)
- culture-related issues discussed in the text for almost all disorders
- cultural formulation interview provides 16 questions clinicians can use to help understand how culture may be shaping the clinical presentation
- appendix describes syndromes that appear in particular cultures, culturally specific ways of expressing distress, and cultural explanations about cause of symptoms, illness, and distress
what does the DSM-5 caution clinicians re: culture?
not to diagnose symptoms unless atypical and problematic w/in a person’s culture
focus on influence of culture on disorder presentation
9 cultural concepts of distress
appendix in DSM-5 includes 9 cultural concepts of distress to describe syndromes that are observed w/in specific regions/ cultural groups
replaces 25 seperate diagnoses from DSM-IV
Criticisms of the DSM (2)
- too many diagnoses
- relatively common reactions pathologized
- comorbidity: presence of a second diagnosis - 45% of ppl diagnosed w/ one disorder will meet criteria for another
(some people prefer externalizing and internalizing disorders as labels)
-reliability in everyday practice - clients not so easily pigeonholed
externalizing and internalizing disorders
externalizing: childhood conduct disorder, adult antisocial personality disorder, alcohol/ substance use disoder
internalizing: anxiety disorders, ptsd, depressive disorders
people with one are at higher risk for another
Research Domain Criteria (RDoC)
National Institute of Mental Health adressing problem of OVERLAP in RISK FACTORS
refer to psychological variables that are relevant for many conditions
trying to create NEW SYSTEM based on NEUROSCIENCE and GENETIC data instead of just clinical systems
Neumonic : doctor into neuroscience and genetic data
interrater Reliability in relation to diagnosis
extent to which clinicians agree on the diagnosis
in research studies, interrater reliabilty for DSM is pretty good, not as much in everyday practice
categorical classification
in the DSM-5 diagnoses are based on categorical classification
must have a certain amount of symptoms - demarcates a particular point where treatment is recommended
dimensional diagnostic system
describes degree of symptoms
provide a way to describe subthreshold symptoms, and symptoms that are particularly severe
Neumonic: the 4th dimension is all about degrees of things
Construct Validity of Diagnostic Categories
diagnoses are constructs- because there is no lab test available to diagnose disorders w/ certainty
we have to operationalize the diagnoses properly in order for them to measure what they’re supposed to
what does strong construct validity (of diagnoses) predict? (Past present future)
a wide range of characteristics including
- possible etiological causes (past)
( biological vulnerability and psychosocial triggers) - clincical characteristics (current)
- predict treatment response (future)
( - treatment response- course of symptoms
- social functioning)
criticisms of diagnosing psychological disorders
- stigma against mental illness
(being treated differently, hard to find a job) - categories can’t capture uniqueness of a person
(disorder doesn’t define the person- person w/ schizophrenia vs schizophrenic). - classification can emphasize trivial similarities
(relevant info (that may not be as statistically prevalent) may be overlooked)
psychological assessment techniques are used to:
- describe clients problem
- determine causes of problem
- arrive at diagnosis
- develop treatment strategy
- monitor treatment progress
- conduct research
ideal assessment involves
multiple measures and methods (interviews, personality inventories, intelligence tests, etc.)
psychological assessment methods (5)
- interviews
- stress measures
- psychological tests
- direct observation
- self- observation
Neumonic:
A ruler that says psychological
-rulers interviewing for a job
- ruler taking a test
-ruler w magnifying glass
- ruler meditating on self
types of interviews
- clinical interview
- structured interviews
clinical interviews
- learns about patient’s problems through conversation- how are q’s answered
- PARADIGM of interviewer shapes interview
- involves establishing RAPPORT
- involves EMPATHIZING, using REFLECTION
- less reliable b/c relies on intuition and general experience, informal
Structured interviews
- collect standardized info by asking same q’s in predetermined ORDER
- used for DIAGNOSTIC purposes
- Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I of DSM (SCID)
- good interrater reliability for most diagnostic categories
Structured Clinical Interview for Axis I of DSM (SCID)
- structured interview
- BRANCHING interview- response to one question determines next question asked
- THREE POINT SEVERITY scale that translates ratings to diagnosis
Stress
subjective experience of distress in response to perceived environmental problems
life stressors: environmental problems that trigger the subjective sense of stress