ch 11 Flashcards
INTRODUCTION
-Küchlüg, escaping the Mongols, having him chase him, when dead they found themselves in Central Asia
-Their conquest of the region was one without the forethought of empire, yet the area absorbed,
adopted, and integrated the Mongols, just as it had incorporated external forces many times before.
-Central Asia displayed a remarkable ability to embrace foreign influences, such as the Turkic
migrations, expansion of Islam, and Mongol conquest, internalizing them and making them its
own, much like an interesting stew. Situated at the crossroads of many empires, Central Asia was
tucked in between the Chinese, Europeans, Arabs, and Indians. There, in the middle of these grand
civilizations, just along the Great Silk Road, the region connected the Orient to the Occident and
linked it to major patterns in world history.
GEOGRAPHY OF CENTRAL ASIA
-Perhaps the most well-known
topographic area in Central Asia is the
great Eurasian Steppe, a latitudinal belt
of grassland that stretches from Eastern
Europe through Mongolia. It was there
that nomadic horse cultures flourished.
-Transoxiana. This is a dry region
that lies beyond the Oxus River, known
today as the Amu Darya. In Transoxiana
trade settlements and irrigated agricul-
ture developed along the Amu Darya and
Syr Darya watersheds.
-the mountainous area
of Khorasan, the cultural capital of Persia
prior to the appearance of the Mongols.
TURKIC MIGRATIONS
-Asia. Beginning with the Xiongnu
a long-term exodus of
steppe peoples spread out of Mongolia and
into Central Asia.
-For millennia prior to the
rise of Genghis Khan, the winners of the
tribal battles for predominance on the Orkhon Steppe, prime pastureland located in western
Mongolia, forced the vanquished off to the west.
-These periodic mass departures of Turkic tribes
out of the area progressed
southwest into Central Asia
in a migration conquest,
not a trade diaspora, as
happened to Africans during
the slave trade. These new
arrivals forever altered the
ethnic makeup of Central
Asia. Previously, the region
had been predominantly
Persian and Indo-European;
when the waves of Turkic
tribes penetrated into the
area, though, they occupied
the great steppe and agricul-
tural basin of Central Asia
and pushed these Persian
groups to the fringes. Over
time, they slowly Turkified
the area, endowing it with a
more nomadic character.
-These Turkic tribesmen divided their society into five strata. Members of the royal tribal clan
presided over the social order. This dominant group bestowed its name on the tribal confederation,
a collection of tribes. Positioned below them were their allies and associated tribes. Next were the
common herders who did not participate in struggles for power. Lower still were the artisans, such
as blacksmiths and leatherworkers. And finally, we find slaves at the bottom of the hierarchy. They
usually acquired their lowly position in society by means of capture in times of war.
-These Turkic wanderers belonged to an unstable confederation of clans and tribes roaming
the steppe, loosely bound under a khagan, a charismatic monarch who laid claim to some sort
of divine providence.
-Khagan made use of their personal charisma, as well as their political and
military smarts, in order to maintain group cohesion and ward off challenges to their authority.
Under strong khagans, tribal confederations were capable of wielding incredible power, but, more
often than not, they were notoriously volatile and often imploded upon the death of their leader,
collapsing into a brutal struggle for power. The winners in this struggle forced the losers out of the
area, and while many went to the north or south, most to the west. Victorious tribes remained in
Mongolia on the highly-prized Orkhon Steppe, located near Lake Baikal.
-Although the khaganate was a diarchy, or system of dual rule, with the oldest son controlling
half of the land, it lacked a clear transition of power, like hereditary succession.
- Because the khagan
theoretically ruled over a series of tribal confederations, any member of the tribal confederation
could ascend to the position of monarch by demonstrating their personal charisma and martial
skills on the battlefield. This often resulted in a fight to prove oneself that could erupt into broader
inter-tribal strife.
-Periodic Turkic migrations into Central Asia transformed the sedentary culture of the region. These steppe peoples lived by practicing pastoral nomadism, a way of life centered around
Herding, lived a utilitarian life
-In order to maintain
their pastures, these horsemen followed
a fixed, seasonal pattern of migration
because they did not want their flocks
to overgraze. During the winter, for
instance, they camped in foothills and
mountain valleys, where it was warmer
at lower altitudes. There they built fixed
shelters with one main objective: survival.
-The oral tradition, which included songs,
epic narratives, and parables, flourished
during the inhospitable winter months.
-In the spring, the nomads made a ten-day trip to the prairieland to graze their herds on fresh
grass that just emerged from mountain runoff. There the women and children erected a central
camp, usually comprising four yurts, while the men divided the flocks into their specific pastures.
They established about ten satellite camps around the central camp, with each herd positioned
about ten to twenty miles from the center. This separation of camps minimized the potential
threat that their enemies posed to their herds.
-During the summer, they traveled to mid-mountain
fields, where it was cooler and offered access to water. Covering about ten miles per day, it took
them approximately fifty days to reach this campground.
-Finally, in the fall, they returned to the
steppe in order to make provisions for the harsh winter. These preparations included drying and
preserving their meat, and taking milk from their animals.
-Enhanced mobility was the key to the survival of pastoral nomads. They actually spent a good
portion of their lives on horseback and were accustomed to moving over long distances, taking all of
life’s necessities with them. This allowed them to retreat quickly from rival attacks or areas afflicted
by natural disaster. Though their way of life appeared seemingly innocuous, it enhanced the ability
of these horsemen to expand rapidly and conquer neighboring groups.
-The annual Great Hunt
served as a military proving ground that helped them hone their fighting skills. In preparation for
winter, tribes deployed groups of mounted
men, who dispersed in different directions,
with the intent of driving every animal within
a set perimeter inwards to converge at a
pre-established central point. With great co-
ordination taking place over vast distances,
these migrants learned how to coordinate
their movements based on a color scheme of
arrows and whistling patterns. Their herding
tactics easily translated to military tactics and
proved devastating in combat.
-Able to ride on horseback and shoot archery at the same time, very skilled in it
- The combination of the skills
acquired from herding, the double-compound bow, and the Mongol Horse, translated to a formula
for political domination of Central Asia, at least until the arrival of Genghis Khan and the Mongols.
-Turkic domination of the region began on the battlefield, where the strategies of steppe warfare
proved devastating to infantry-based armies. The first stage of the nomad battle strategy
often commenced with a feigned retreat,
-the Turkic
horsemen were reluctant to risk fighting an enemy that they did not believe they could defeat,
instead, they would poison water wells, scorch the earth, and retreat. The Mongols would later
employ similar battle tactics that allowed them to conquer the whole of Central Asia.
–they had a lot of military tactics that were quite successfull
ISLAM
-Islam was not the first foreign religion to arrive in Central Asia. In fact, the region had already
been exposed to many foreign systems of belief prior to the coming of Islam in the seventh
century.
-Local merchants conducting long-distance trade along the Silk Road came into contact
with many different religious doctrines; the trade route served as a conveyor of not only goods but
also concepts.
(Generally, intellectual diffusion is not a one-way street, as western ideas traveled
eastward and eastern concepts filtered into the west.)
-The great
number of religions found in the area at the introduction of Islam testified to the great tolerance
of the region. By the tenth century, however, all of the non-monotheistic faiths had disappeared
from Central Asia in the aftermath of Islamic conquest.
-It was Qutayba ibn Muslim (669 – 716) who expanded the presence of Islam in Central
Asia during the eighth century, as the general’s forces swept into the area, defeated the Persians,
and by 715 CE completed their conquest of Transoxiana,
-A decisive Arab Muslim victory over the Chinese at the Battle of Talas River in 751
secured Central Asia and repulsed the only major challenge to Islamic rule. The triumph over the Chinese made it possible for Islam to become entrenched in the region.
-The Persian Samanids
(819 – 999) made Islam the official state religion and established a school of theology in Bukhara.
-Islamization did not take place overnight; instead, it took centuries.
-Transoxiana slowly
Islamicized, though it never Arabized. The peoples in the area remained culturally Turkic and
Persian. Central Asia retained its Turkic and Persian languages,
-Unlike
other places, where the religion filtered into society from the bottom up, as was the case in
Southeast Asia, Islamization in the region occurred from the top down. The process incorporated
native peoples, who took part in the process of conversion. Local leaders submitted to the faith
in order to maintain their social status and elite position in society. The conquerors offered the
Central Asian nobility important positions in the administration so long as they professed Islam,
providing the opportunity for the native elite to rule in their own right.
-Islam allowing some traditional practices to remain so long as
it accelerated conversion. By accepting certain harmless practices in order to Islamicize Central
Asia, these Muslims mirrored Christian efforts to Christianize Eastern Europe.
Sufism
-The Islam of Central Asia differed greatly from that which originated in the Arabian Peninsula.
This vast region embraced Islam, remaking it into a syncretic faith that was culturally its own.
-Essentially a sort of mysticism, or folk Islam, Sufism in the area emerged from the fusion of Islamic
sedentary civilization and Buddhist nomadic culture.
-Central Asians generally receptive, missionaries used for it to take roots
-The urban-dwell-
ing and agricultural populations of the region generally accepted Sunni Islam and the law of the
Sharia; however, the culture and lifestyle of the itinerant peoples of the steppe did not readily
conform to the rigors of Islamic law.
-Doctrinal flexibility of Sufism helped convert these tribes to Islam
-What arose from the mix of orthodox Islam and Turkic pastoral nomadism
was a uniquely Central Asian brand of Sufism.
-Sufi
merchants were largely responsible for bringing Islam to the region. Central Asian Sufi orders such
as the Yasaviyah established themselves along trade routes in order to reach out to travelers.
-Meanwhile, the
Naqshbandi Order, operating in travel lodges, spread Sufism by ministering to Iranian and
Tajik peoples. The followers of these Sufi orders believed that they could better disseminate a
form of the faith that was more loving and caring.
THE MONGOL ERA
-thirteenth century: Mongols greatly expanded
-forces indigenous to the region shaped the world around it; foreign
influence waned as a consequence of nativism.
-The Mongols created the largest empire in history,
as Central Asia externalized the violence of the steppe, yet it was with enormous difficulty that
they even united as a people. Perhaps the greatest obstacle for them to overcome was their own
divisiveness. Inter-tribal strife was commonplace, but once they united, the Mongols expanded
deep into Russia, China, India, and the Middle East.
A New System for Unity
-It was Temujin (1206 – 1227), later known as Genghis Khan, who brought this fractured
people together and developed a method of governance and expansion that lasted long after his
death.
-keen awareness of his own destiny, vision that God predestined him
-Some
historians believe that Temujin acquired the notion
of conquering all of the Mongols from his liberation
of Börte, his wife
-Temujin demanded a high level of commitment from his people, endowing his forces with
a coherency and unity of purpose. He also promoted allies based on merit, rather than by the
traditional Mongol method of advancement based on position within the tribal hierarchy. His
opponents, on the other hand, lacked his force of will and entered into a series of squabbles.
Temujin took advantage of their internal fights, emerging victorious
-The culmination
of his ascendency took place that year at a Mongol assembly, or khuriltai, which appointed him
as the first undisputed ruler of the Mongols, uniting them under the authority of his position.
Temujin adopted the name of Genghis Khan, or universal ruler in this context.
-presided over a people who had previously had near constant warfare, He consolidated all of these diverse tribes and reshaped them
into a single “nation,” endowing Mongol society with more cohesiveness, a key element to future
expansion. He did this by developing a new political order that deviated from tradition.
-By forcing
the men from one tribe to stand guard over the pastures of other tribes, he weakened loyalty to
ancestral lines and homelands, thereby reinforcing his own leadership.
-Genghis Khan represented the ultimate source of justice in his newly-formed state, consol-
idating his position and making it more authoritarian. By embodying autocracy in the position
of the khan, he made the title of khan institutional, not personal, building a new foundation for
legitimacy.
-Previously, tribal leadership rested on charisma. Furthermore, the great khan could
not be self-proclaimed but had to be recognized at a khuriltai.
-His law, known as Yassa, originated as decrees delivered during war. Yassa remained secret,
which allowed Genghis Khan to adapt it to changing circumstances.
-He based his code on shamanist
principles, and it served as the social and political formula binding all Mongols together. It also
strengthened Mongol, rather than clan or tribal identification.
- It is believed that Genghis Khan
himself directed the law, while his stepbrother Shihihutag served as the high judge, and his son
Chagatai administered its execution.
Expansion
-After
subduing inter-tribal warfare, he followed tradition and exported the violence of the steppe. He
offered incentives to his soldiers; the spoils of victory went to those who followed him into battle.
Genghis Khan received ten percent of the loot and divided the remaining ninety percent between his commanders, who, in turn, distributed their portion amongst their retinue.
-This plunder also
included the inhabitants of all subjugated lands, which resulted in the dramatic depopulation of
conquered territory, as the khan received his share of artisans and craftsmen to be sent back to
the itinerant Mongol capital.
-In 1208, Genghis Khan targeted northern China for pillaging, but he quickly encountered con-
siderable difficulties overcoming well-fortified Chinese municipalities. The Chinese had ringed
their principle metropolises with moats and connected these major urban centers to several
smaller satellite towns via underground tunnels. The Mongols had attempted to starve these cities
into submission, but they lacked the military technology necessary to overcome walls forty-feet
high and fifty-feet wide. To counter these challenges, they imported the technology necessary to
defeat Chinese cities. Genghis Khan also compensated for a lack of native talent by incorporating
foreign engineers into their army. He utilized Arab, Persian, and Chinese experts to solve the
problem of defeating Chinese municipalities. Their knowledge of siege warfare enabled them to
construct the siege engines capable of subjugating cities.
-Adding these new sedentary peoples to the khan’s army inevitably caused problems, for
these men hailed from distinctly different cultures and did not interact well with the Mongols.
-Genghis Khan, therefore, combined the mobility of his forces with the slow, bulky siege engines
of the sedentary armies. While he kept his cavalry independent from the foreign engineers,
mostly comprised of mercenaries, he blended these two disparate groups on the battlefield to
his strategic advantage.
-For the Mongols, building an empire was easier than keeping one
-But the Mongols had difficulty understanding settled
civilization and did not know how to maintain order in that new and different cultural milieu.
Although they were able to instill fear in their enemies and easily forced many cities to capitu-
late, the Mongols co-opted local officials to ensure that taxes and tribute flowed freely back to
their capital.
-With his newly-constructed army, Genghis Khan returned to northern China again in 1210
and began a continuous campaign of destruction, primarily directed against the Jin Dynasty
(1115 – 1234), an empire ruled by a Jurchen minority, a Tungusic people from Manchuria who
would later call themselves the Manchu.
-failed attempt at China, then succeeding in sacking it annually, This campaign represented the
first significant addition of territory to the Mongol Empire.
-As this chapter began, it was with the tenacious pursuit of the fugitive Küchlüg in 1216 that
originally brought the Mongols into Central Asia. There they aroused the disdain of the local ruler
in the area, Khwarazmshah Ala al-Din Muhammad II. Ruling over a loose confederation of
disparate peoples, Ala al-Din Muhammad lacked security in his position as the Khwarazmshah, he provoked the wrath of the Mongols
-Mongols spies (most likely) sent in caravan, Inalchuq, uncle of Ala al-Din Muhammad and governor of Otrar, improvidently convinced the Khwarazmshah to have the entire party executed. An enraged Genghis Khan quickly dispatched
another envoy and demanded that the governor of the city be put to death and have his head
sent back to Mongolia as proof that Genghis Khan’s wishes were fulfilled. The shah executed
this emissary too, a rash decision that precipitated the Mongol onslaught of Central Asia, which
resulted in brutal massacres and a drastic depopulation of the region.
-teared city apart, the shah Ala al-Din got away, died of pleurisy
-Meanwhile, Jalal al-Din Manguburti, the
son of the Khwarazmshah, assembled an army
of resistance. Genghis Khan sent his stepbrother
Shihihutug to apprehend Jalal, but he escaped
to the Hindu Kush Mountains of Afghanistan.
Jalal’s forces managed to defeat the Shihihutug-
led Mongols on the field of battle at Parwan
in the spring of 1221, a rare loss. The Mongols
actually respected Jalal for his display of valor
and willingness to resist them.
-then defeated Jalal
-The Central Asia campaign had started as a punitive
expedition but in the process had wiped out any
type of resistance in the region.
-Jebe and Sübedei to explore and reconnoiter the
west. Between 1221 and 1223 the two most gifted
of the khan’s generals traveled towards Russia.
In the course of their journey, they defeated
the Georgians, Armenians, princes of Rus,
and Kipchak Turkic tribes. Then they abruptly
returned home. The purpose was not to annex
the territory but to gather intelligence, which
proved to be important to their campaign against
the princes of Rus between 1236 and 1240.
-Meanwhile, Genghis Khan had died on expedi-
tion in southern China in 1227. Upon his death,
the Mongols participated in a year of mourning,
halting expansion.
Succession
-The Mongols were the only steppe tribes
whose empire actually expanded upon the
death of its founder.
-most conquests actually transpired after Gengis died
-it did
not implode because Genghis Khan
had invented a safe and reliable means
of transferring power. He also stabi-
lized Mongol society and made it less
fractious, constructing a framework
for subsequent generations to follow.
-To maintain political legitimacy and
inherit the throne under this new
system, one had to trace their ancestry
back to Genghis Khan through his
wife Börte and her four sons, Juchi,
Chagatai, Ögedei, and Tolui. This
concept dramatically limited contenders for the khanate, mitigating future competition for suc-
cession.
-The khan’s plan to transfer power upon his death also fused older steppe traditions with his
new vision. He bequeathed to his sons parts of the world yet unconquered, so that they had to
win these new areas. This stipulation produced an incentive for his sons to cooperate in order to
collect their patrimony. Genghis Khan had divided the four patrimonial ulus, or states, amongst
his sons. The four subsequent empires that grew out of these ulus included the Golden Horde,
who were the descendants of Juchi and controlled Russia; the Chagatai Khanate, which traced
its lineage to Chagatai and governed Central Asia; the Mongol-founded Yuan Dynasty in China,
the progeny of Tolui; and the Ilkhanate of Persia, inheritors of the House of Hülegü and also the
successors of Tolui.
-Genghis
Khan expressed a desire that his son
Ögedei succeed him, a decision that
affronted Juchi, his eldest, whose
lineage was questioned. Fortunately for
the Mongols, Juchi’s death preceded
that of his father’s, narrowly averting a
potential civil war.
-and it was
under Ögedei that the Mongols realized
their destiny of world domination.
-Between 1230 and 1233, Ögedei’s troops
defeated the remnants of the Jin dynasty
in central China. Then they focused
their attention on Russia, as they had actionable intelligence on the divisions among the Russian
principalities dating to a 1223 reconnaissance mission
that utterly crushed a coalition of Russian and Kipchak
princes.
-No military power in
Europe was capable of withstanding a Mongol attack.
-It was Ögedei’s death and Batu’s independence
of thought that saved Europe from Mongol conquest. (Batu knew he wouln’t become the next khan, so he put off the election for five years since he never came when summoned home like the rest)
-The khuriltai finally proclaimed Güyük, eldest son of
Ögedei, the next khan in 1246. This was not a legitimate
election though because of Batu’s conspicuous absence.
Güyük quickly dispatched an army to punish Batu for
meddling in the political process of succession, but Batu
had already arranged for his cousin’s assassination in
1248. Güyük’s death led to another period of paralysis. A
khuriltai eventually nominated Möngke, Tolui’s oldest
son, as the next great khan in 1251. Now Möngke had
to deal with the problem that Batu presented. He was
willing to allow for Batu’s autonomy so long as he recog-nized Möngke as the legitimate khan. It was at this point that Batu’s horde become the Golden
Horde. He adopted the moniker of “golden” because he was asserting his independence.
-Batu died in 1256, and his younger brother Berke became the first khan of the Golden Horde
to accept Islam. This sudden conversion to Islam caused systemic problems in the Mongol Empire because different parts of the four lines of Genghis Khan would adopt different faiths, resulting in political divisions that aligned with religious divisions.
- As a Muslim, Berke spurned his Buddhist
cousins and established firm links with the Turkic Mamluk Sultanate in Egypt, thus making an
alliance based on faith with a power outside of the Mongol Empire.
-Genghis Khan’s empire had exceeded normal steppe expectations, and, with potential fault
lines emerging already, his vision of a politically unified empire was never truly realized. A
series of civil wars erupted not long thereafter that fractured the Mongol Empire. First came the
Toluid Civil War (1260 – 1264), then the Berke-Hülegü War (1262), and finally the Kaidu-Kublai
War (1268 – 1301). These three wars had the combined effect of undermining the great khan’s
authority, and the empire ended up breaking apart on along the lines of the patrimonial ulus,
with each moving in their own direction. In fact, the successors of Kublai Khan (1260 – 1294),
who presided over the Yuan Dynasty in China, could not even convene a khuriltai to appoint a
great khan following his death. By 1294, there was neither fiction nor façade of a unified Mongol
Empire. It was the end of a unified political unit.
THE KHANATE OF CHAGATAI
-The origins of the Chagatai Khanate shaped its political
and demographic character; Chagatai, the second son, obtained the core of Central Asia, a personal pasture-
land located along the Kazakh
steppe. He also received the
settled lands to the south
in modern day Uzbekistan.
Chagatai never demonstrated
ambition for the position of
great khan; rather, he played
an important role helping
his brother Ögedei exercise
authority and uphold Yassa.
-Chagatai served as
the glue that helped hold the
Mongol Empire together.
-cultural differences that existed between steppe and settled societies. His solution to the conflict
between these two civilizations was known as Inju, a dual-administrative system and a form of
indirect rule. Inju was a political concession designed to separate the two incompatible cultures,
allowing both to maintain their own traditional laws yet remain subject to the authority of
Chagatai and his descendants.
-Chagatai was conscious not to force Yassa on sedentary Muslim
cities; however, it continued to be exercised on the plains. In agricultural and urban areas, a
bureaucratic tradition with a Muslim administration persisted. So long as these Muslims did not
openly resist Mongol control, they could go about their daily business, free from Mongol interfer-
ence in their life.
-It was in this way that the steppe continued to abide by customary Mongol law, while in the south the people of the cities lived according to the Sharia, or Quranic law.
-Inju was also an economic arrangement granting the Mongols a share of the resources produced in sedentary lands. The Mongols rewarded those who cooperated in governance with a portion of the profits; those who participated in Inju were entitled to their allotment of the common imperial
settled possessions.
-At first, all of the conquered towns remained the property of the khan, but
over time access to the wealth of the urban areas extended to the nomads who took part in Inju.
-Although Inju was a practical solution to the difficulty of governing the two separate societies,
it ultimately did not resolve the problem of uniting the sedentary Turkic population and the
nomadic Mongols since it failed to accommodate the needs of either society. Actually, it encour-
aged friction between the two civilizations because it placed hardships on both peoples.
-While the
horsemen benefited handsomely from Inju, they considered it incompatible with their traditional
practices because it forced them to climb down from their steeds and settle down in the cities.
-First, the maintenance of empire disrupted the nomadic way of
life because they often had to join in exhaustive campaigns, lasting years at a time. Second, the
nomads were unaccustomed to a considerable amount of government interference in their daily
routine. Increasingly, they viewed the prospect of governing an empire as a burden and preferred
to revert to a pastoral lifestyle on the prairie. They sought more independence and stability, so
they consciously began to defect from the system and return to their pastures.
-Inju encumbered urban-dwelling (settled lands in the south)
and farming peoples too. The Mongols stressed this population by raising additional taxes in
an unpredictable and disruptive manner. This annoyed the city folk, who were accustomed to
more regular taxation.
-Ultimately, Inju did not mesh well with either lifestyle. The practice rested
on force, not utility.
-The Mongol state sustained two different societies that often remained in
conflict, so it stayed in a state of permanent instability.
Turko-Mongol Fusion
-The Mongols were the first to unify the Eurasian steppe, and their occupation of the region corre-
sponded to a wholesale takeover.
-Mongols offered these
Turkic groups a deal to either merge with them or suffer harsh reprisal. So as the Mongols progressed
westward, their armies gained strength, as more and more of the Turkic tribesmen joined them,
resulting in armies that were mostly comprised of Turkic peoples, not Mongols.
-In this manner, the
Turkic groups absorbed and assimilated the invading Mongols, a process known as Turkification;
the conflict between the two cultures faded over time and eventually led to a fusion of Turkic and
Mongolian societies. Over time, these Mongol pastoralists presiding over a sedentary Islamic culture
slowly Turkified. They quickly became a Mongol minority governing a Turkic majority.
-There were numerous points of contention between the two groups but also many commonal-
ities. Both societies had originated on the steppe in modern day Mongolia, and, while the Turkic
groups had settled down over the years and adopted more of a sedentary existence, many of the
principles of pastoral nomadism still lingered in their culture. Both adhered to a patrimonial
distribution of inheritance. Also, both the Turkic groups and the Mongols organized along tribal
lines, and each followed a pattern of co-opting one tribe into another, thus facilitating a fusion of
the Mongols with their Turkic hosts.
-to work, the Mongols used the Turkic tongue, Chagatai
-For many years, religion remained the only major distinction between the two societies, but
once the Chagataids converted to Islam in 1333 this conspicuous difference disappeared. While
the Mongols adopted the creed and language of the Turkic Chagatai, these Turkic peoples incor-
porated the Mongol political concept of Genghis-Khanid legitimacy.
THE KHANATE OF THE ILKHANS (1265 – 1335)
-Hülegü Khan (1256 – 1265),
grandson of Genghis Khan and
son of Tolui, served his brother
Möngke (1251 – 1259), the great
khan, and campaigned through the
Middle East,
-hulegu’s brother gave him title of Ilkhan, a secondary khan who remained subordinate only to the great khan in Mongolia. This
portion of the empire became known as the Khanate of the Ilkhans.
-The Ilkhans were a Mongol minority ruling over a Muslim majority; religious problems plagued
the Ilkhanate for much of its existence.
-To begin with, Hülegü, a Nestorian Christian, who later
converted to Buddhism on his deathbed, had sacked Baghdad, one of the most politically important
cities in the Islamic world, an act that alienated him from his Muslim cousin Berke Khan, ruler of
the Golden Horde.
-The conversion of the Golden Horde to Islam had presented a real problem,
for the Ilkhans had initially championed Buddhism in Iraq and Iran.
-As animosity continued to
mount between the two parts of the Mongol Empire over religious differences,
- Faith-based civil wars consumed much of the reign of Abaga Khan
(1265 – 1282). These wars were rooted in the Ilkhanate’s inappropriate treatment of their Muslim
population. The Golden Horde’s alliance with the Mamluks threatened the Ilkhanate, and yet no
longer could Abaga rely on the full might of centralized Mongol power;
-Much of the religious conflict during the early
Ilkhanate related to doctrinal differences between
Islam and the traditional Mongol way of life. The
most stubborn problem for the two was the contra-
diction between the traditional Mongolian method
of animal slaughter, which required that no blood
be spilled, and the Islamic code of cleanliness, which
necessitated that all blood be drained. Each side was
appalled by the other’s customs.Also monothestic Muslims finding Mongol religious image worship repulsive
-not only spiritual, but also economic troubles
-Gaykhatu Khan (1291 – 1295)
practically emptied the royal treasury with profli-
gate spending. He experimented with paper money
recently adopted from China to compensate for his
wasteful expenditures, but overprinting resulted in
massive inflation. The Ilkhans also tried to extract
the maximum amount of tribute from the country-
side to offset declining revenues. This led to an abuse
in tax gathering, known as tax farming, in which
rulers sold contracts for the collection of revenues to the highest bidder. This method of tax col-
lection provided a strong incentive to despoil peasants.
-It was Mahmud Ghazan (1295 – 1304) who solved the Ilkhanate’s continued religious and
economic problems. He was the first Ilkhan to convert to Islam, thus rehabilitating their image
in the eyes of their Muslim subjects and making their rule much more acceptable.
-In terms of scholarship, the first
true history of the world was completed under the sponsorship of Mahmud Ghazan. Written by
Rashid al-Din Hamadani (1247 – 1318), the book was richly illustrated with watercolors and
portraiture in the Chinese style.
-ilkhanates good at predicting lunar eclipses
-Ilkhanates reviving silk road, Cities did revive, but the long term negative consequence of conquest continued to be
felt by the peasants who suffered from prolonged violence.
-eventually Ilkhans went native too. Here we
see a Persian-Mongol fusion, as they began to identify with Persian culture and speak the Persian
language. As they bonded with Persia, they adopted Islam and began to promote Persian as the
written language of their land.
TIMUR
-Timur attempted to smooth out their differences,developed a political arrangement that could harness the best attributes of
each society, without the dangerous side effect of communal violence associated with combining
the two civilizations.
-He also constructed a new political and military machine that was deeply
ingrained in the political background of the Chagatai Khanate, even while he acknowledged that
Inju satisfied neither the nomad nor the settled society and eliminated the practice. Astutely rec-
ognizing that serious conflict existed between these two incongruent cultures under his control,
Timur provided a framework for both societies to live in harmony.
-Timur came out of Central Asia and was a
product of the Turko-Mongol fusion. He descended from an aristocratic Mongol clan, but he was
raised as a Muslim and spoke a Turkic language.
-Unable to trace his ancestry to Genghis Khan, he
could not take the title of khan in his own
right.
-he would
have to earn it. His solution was to take the
title of emir, meaning commander, and rule
through a Chagatayid puppet khan acting
as a figurehead. The emir also married into
the family of Genghis Khan so that his children ciuld be legitimate for it
-To strengthen the security of his position
as emir, he constructed a system of support
that ordered his political connections in a
series of concentric rings: primary ring family and close allies, second loyal tribes like his own Barles Clan, third people he defeated on the battlefield, second and third balanced each other, outermost hereditary
professional administrators and bureaucrats, soldiers from the plains serving in his cavalry units,
and finally the Persian urban and agricultural populations, from which he recruited his infantry
and siege units.
-Like many transitional figures in history, such as Suleiman the Magnificent, Timur bridged
the medieval and modern worlds.
-designed a novel military machine that was well adapted to the environment in which he lived. His
military was the product of a Turko-Mongol fusion, employing Turkic siege techniques and the
Mongol cavalry. Unlike Genghis Khan, however, Timur increasingly combined his cavalry, siege,
and infantry units, placing his heavy cavalry at the center of formations. His army also utilized an
early form of artillery. He ventured to monopolize the market on gunpowder technology so that
other powers could not benefit from it.
-Timur was determined to keep his volatile
army occupied, so they would not be a burden
to the sedentary population in his realm.
-It was
in this context that he developed a formula for
success that promoted peace at home and war
abroad, a policy that best served the interests of
the merchants and townspeople. He externalized
the violence of the steppe and destroyed all of the
other trade routes that bypassed his territory.
Timur attempted to reactivate and dominate the
Silk Road and diverted trade to his lands in order
to help rebuild the cities that had been damaged
from years of Mongol and nomad rule. He did
not aim at permanent occupation or the creation
of new states; he just wanted to devastate, even
going so far as to campaign against the Golden
Horde, Delhi Sultanate, and the Ottoman Empire,
all in an effort to redirect trade in his direction.
-Timur showed his strategic genius
in these expeditions. He defeated a steppe power on the steppe. He put the pieces of his army
together in such a way so that he could take his enemies on in their arena and on their terms.
In this manner, Timur crushed Tokhtamysh, leader of the Golden Horde,
-interesting byproduct of Timur’s campaign against the Golden Horde was that it precipitated the
rise of the Grand Duchy of Moscow. He had weakened the Golden Horde to such an extent
that it made it possible for Moscow to throw off the Mongol yoke.
-Timur raided into India from 1398 to 1399 and dealt a blow to the southern sea route that
connected the Occident to the Orient. This expedition was primarily for looting, since he never
intended to conquer and annex the territory of Nasir-ud-Din Mahmud Shah Tughluq, the
last member of the Tughluq Dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate. During this campaign, Timur’s tactical
brilliance was on full display; he had an uncanny ability to adapt to any martial environment that
he confronted.
-Timur’s final conquest period against the Ottomans, had previously tried to avoid conflict with them
-Unlike Gengis Khan, TImur’s empire didn’t uphold after his death, fragmenting with squabbles over succession
Terror and Destruction
Timur certainly committed what we would describe today as war crimes; there definitely was
an element of terrorism to his campaigns. In fact, as an admirer of architecture, he is known to
have constructed pyramids of human skulls. Extant accounts describe him slaughtering 100,000
Indian prisoners following the Delhi uprising.
-But not all destruction was the same; and there
was a definite difference between that of Genghis Khan and Timur. The emir’s annihilation of the
region was not meant to serve a utilitarian purpose so much as to inflict suffering.
-Genghis Khan’s
used terror as a method to protect his troops, whereas Timur engaged in terror and destruction
for pleasure.
Legacy
-A product of the Turko-Mongolian fusion, Timur had been the first to reunite the eastern and
western parts of the Chagatai ulus.
-Under Timur we see growing political and cultural
distinctions between Iran, Central Asia proper, and India begin to cement. In this context, we see
a split taking place on the steppe that will lead to a differentiation of the Uzbeks and Kazaks. By
the late fourteenth century, the tribes on the steppe to the north will become known to Muslim
writers as Kazaks, whereas the tribes to the south will be increasingly referred to as Uzbeks, a
differentiation that has continued to persist and helped to delimit modern borders.
CONCLUSION
Three forces combined to shape the course of Central Asian history: the Turkic migrations,
expansion of Islam, and the Mongol conquest. Beginning in the second century BCE, waves of
Turkic migrations entered the region. It is debatable whether or not they Turkified the original
Iranian inhabitants or permanently changed the ethnic makeup of the area. Turkic tribes occupied
the great steppe, Turkifying the region and endowing it with a more nomadic character. They also
populated the agricultural basin of Transoxiana, displacing the original Iranian inhabitants of the
area. Many of these Turks slowly settled down over time. These Turkic peoples displayed a unique
ability to absorb the Islamic faith and internalize the Mongol conquest.
Islam transformed the religious adherence of Central Asia and left a lasting mark on the
region as well. Transoxiana gradually Islamicized, but Turkic and Persian cultures persisted.
Islamization incorporated native peoples in the process of conversion. As Islam spread through
the area, the faith demonstrated an extraordinary capacity to incorporate local traditions, permit-
ting some customs to linger so long as doing so accelerated conversion. Sufi missionaries made
some compromises with the Turkic nomadic culture in order to establish the religion in the area.
Sufism’s inherent flexibility helped to promote conversion, and the blend of orthodox Islam and
Turkic pastoral nomadism created a uniquely Central Asian brand of the faith.
The Mongol conquest of Central Asia had the most immediate impact on the history of the
region. Although the Mongols eventually Turkified over time, the legacy of Genghis-Khanid
legitimacy remained. Genghis Khan had developed a secure and dependable means of transferring
power, for Genghis-Khanid legitimacy reduced the number of contenders vying for the throne;
the Mongols did not collapse as a “nation” following the death of their founder. Genghis Khan
bequeathed a legacy of political legitimacy to the region that would last until 1920.
