Ch. 1: Introduction Flashcards

1
Q

Cooking class with Armenian matriarch

A

Yalom & Co could never get as delicious dishes even following the recipe, until he one day saw her servant throw in spices before putting the dish into the oven. Yalom believes psychotherapy is similar - the books, articles, lectures portray the recipe, yet “I believe that when no one is looking, the therapist throws in the ‘real thing’.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Throw-ins

A

Compassion, presence, caring, extending oneself, touching the patient at a profound level, wisdom?

Freud and Elisabeth von R.: officially Freud treated her with abreaction, but actually talked to her mom, said to visit a man she found attractive, untangled family finances, sent her to visit her sister’s grave, induced calmness before life’s uncertainty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Initial definition of existential psychotherapy

A

a dynamic approach to therapy which focuses on concerns that are rooted in the individual’s existence.

Yalom believes that no matter the school of thought, most psychologists employ many of his insights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dynamic

A

Lay definition: derives from Greek dunasthi, “to have strength”; evokes energy and movement

Technical sense: there is no non-dynamic therapist, no slow or sluggish one; instead the technical term involves the concept of “force” - there are forces in conflict inside individual that result in thoughts, emotions, behaviors, both adaptive and psychopathological
- At different levels of awareness!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Avenues to study the forces

A

deep reflection, dreams, nightmares, flashes of profound experience and insight, psychotic utterances, study of children.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Freudian Psychodynamics

A

A child is governed by instinctual forces and unfurl through a psychosexual developmental cycle.

  • Later a child has to balance this (id) with the demands of the environment (ego) and the demands of the internalized environment (superego).
  • Struggle between delayed gratification and instincts.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Neo-Freudian (Interpersonal) Psychodynamics

A

Aside from being instinct-powered and preprogrammed, a child is entirely shaped by the cultural and interpersonal environment.

  • Basic need = security (acceptance and approval)
  • Quality of interaction with significant adults determines character
  • Conflict arises between natural growth inclinations (energy, curiosity, innocence) and the child’s need for security and approval.
  • Severe conflict ensues from neurotic parents, growth is compromised
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Existential Psychodynamics

A

Conflict that flows from the individual’s confrontation with the givens of existence - intrinsic properties that are a part of the human’s existence of the world.

  • Deep personal reflections (solitude, silence, time, freedom from distraction) help us uncover these givens to reach the ground that underlies all other ground
  • From here on called “ultimate concerns”
  • Often this process of reflection is catalyzed by certain urgent experiences, i.e. “boundary” situations: confrontation with one’s death, collapse of fundamental schema etc.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Four ultimate concerns

A

Death: most easily apprehended - one day we’ll cease to be. Spinoza: “Everything endeavors to persist in it’s own being.” Terrifying.
- Conflict: knowing you’re going to die and wishing to continue to be.

Freedom: far less accessible one. Usually thought of as unequivocally positive, yet in its existential sense it refers to the absence of external structure. An individual is entirely responsible for their own world, choices, actions. In this sense, “freedom” is terrifying: there is no ground beneath us, just a void.
- Conflict: confrontation with groundlessness and our wish for ground.

(Existential) Isolation: not interpersonal, but a fundamental isolation both from creatures and the world. No matter how close you get with someone, there’s always a final unbridgeable gap - each of us enters existence alone and must depart alone.
- Conflict: awareness of absolute isolation and wish for contact, protection.

Meaninglessness: If we must die, if we constitute our own world, if each is ultimately alone in an indifferent universe, then what meaning does life have? Why and how?
- Conflict: meaning seeking creature seeking meaning in a meaningless universe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Freud vs Existential

A

Freud: DRIVE → ANXIETY → DEFENSE MECHANISM

Existential: AWARENESS OF ULTIMATE CONCERN → ANXIETY → DEFENSE MECHANISM

Freud: “deep” = “earliest” or “first” experience of conflict, chronological unlayering

Existential: deep means brushing away everyday concerns and thinking deeply about one’s existential situation. Not to think about how one came to be what one is but to think about that one is. To think outside of time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Otto Rank: leverage

A

therapist has far more leverage if they view the individual as primarily fearful, suffering rather than instinctually driven one. Our psychic operations (defense mechanisms) evolve to deal with anxiety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

“At this moment, what are the most fundamental sources of dread?”

A

Answer cuts beneath any personal life history; instead the answer applies to every person - it belongs to the human being’s “situation” in the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Existential Orientation: Strange But Oddly Familiar

A

Material can feel strange regarding the terms used, but familiar because it tries to get at the “real thing” that therapists throw in.

There’s also familiarity because philosophers, poets and theologians have asked existential questions throughout time (even though modern thinkers might pride otherwise). Existential dread is familiar too because it applies to everyone, not just psychologically ill.

Parish priest: “People are much more unhappy than one thinks… and then the fundamental fact is that there is no such thing as a grown up.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Noxious agents

A

With physical disease there are always noxious agents in the body fighting against the host’s resistance (already before illness). Similarly with psychological illness, the disease doesn’t arise just from a bacterial or viral agent invading the body, it arises as a result of disequilibrium between the agents and the host’s resistance (defence mechanisms). All of us have the noxious agents, some are unable to cope with it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Cervantes

&

Energizing questions

A

These topics are not easy to deal with. Cervantes: “Which would you have, wise madness or foolish sanity?”

In therapy, existential questions are intensely energizing, but often both therapist and client don’t know how to continue with them, thus “Well that’s life, innit? Let’s move on to something neurotic, something we can do something about!”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The Field of Existential Psychotherapy

A

Doesn’t really belong anywhere. No formal school, not welcomed into better academic neighborhoods, no robust journal or society. Yet there are a few scattered cousins.

17
Q

THE ANCESTRAL HOME

A

Two philosophers labeled “existential” may disagree on every cardinal point (aside from their shared aversion to being labeled so).

Most texts resolve to listing a number of themes: being, choice, freedom, death, isolation, absurdity.

18
Q

The “existential” tradition is ageless

A

all thinkers have thought about life and death

19
Q

The “existential” school (in philosophy) probably starts

A

with a Dane in 1834, who thought that he hasn’t contributed much to life like others who have contributed railways, telegraphs, steamboats, literature etc. He mused:

“You must do something but inasmuch as with your limited capacities it will be impossible to make anything easier than it has become, you must, with the same humanitarian enthusiasm as the others, undertake to make something harder.”

Meaning that when all combine to make something easier, then easiness could become excessive. He thought that someone should make things difficult again, and thus Kierkegaard found his destiny. And he didn’t have to look long for the things to make difficult - existence, dread, choices, possibilities and limitations were a good target. A lot of his work had little influence until almost a century later when his works were discovered after WWI by Martin Heidegger and Karl Jaspers.

20
Q

Literary exposition

A

“I will use philosophy a bit, but assume no philosophical background.” However: “Never understood why complicated words are important. That’s why Sartre, Camus, Unamuno, Buber prefer literary exposition rather than formal philosophical argument.”

21
Q

Aim of the existential therapist

A

The aim of the existential therapist is to uncover what the patient has always known all along not offer formal explication.

22
Q

Criticism of Freud (Old Country Cousins)

A

if one applies one schema to explain all individuals then one misses the unique experience of the particular person.

They objected to his:

  • reductionism (all behaviour = few basic drives),
  • materialism (explaining higher in terms of the lower),
  • determinism (belief that all mental functioning is caused by identifiable factors already in existence).
23
Q

Existential analysts agree on one point (Binswanger)

A

analyst must approach phenomenologically - enter the patient’s world and listen to the phenomena of that world without the presuppositions that distort understanding.

Binswanger: “Not one space and time only, but as many spaces and times as there are subjects.”

24
Q

Names who are almost entirely unknown to the Americans

A

Binswanger, Melard Boss, Minkowsky, Gebsattel, Roland Kuhn, G. Caruso, Buytendijk, G. Bally, Viktor Frankl

25
Q

HUMANISTIC PSYCHOLOGISTS: FLASHY AMERICAN COUSINS

A

Two dominant schools in the 50s: behaviorism and psychoanalysis.

Abnormal psychologists and social psychologists were comfortable in experimental psychology. However, many of these personality psychologists - Gordon Allport, Henry Murray, Gardner Murphy, George Kelly, Abraham Maslow, Carl Rogers, and Rollo May - became uncomfortable with the limitations of behaviorism and psychoanalysis.

They wanted to make space for values, love, creativity, self-awareness, human potential - “humanistic psychology”.

Humanistic psychology became the third force in psychology after behaviorism and psychoanalysis.

26
Q

Five postulates of humanistic psychology

A
  1. Human supersedes the sum of his parts - cannot be understood from a scientific study of part-functions.
  2. Human has his being in a human context - cannot be understood by part-functions which ignore interpersonal experiences.
  3. Human is aware - cannot be understood by a psychology which fails to recognize man’s continuous, many-layered self-awareness.
  4. Human has choice - man is not a bystander to his existence, he creates his own experience.
  5. Man is intentional - man points to the future; has purpose, values, and meaning.
27
Q

American vs European

A

The humanistic approach is much more American than its European counterpart psychoanalysis, perhaps the antideterminism, freedom, choice, values etc. comes because Europeans have seen human limitations and tragedy much more closely than Americans. The US bathed in a zeitgeist of expansiveness, optimism, limitless horizons and pragmatism.

28
Q

Counterculture and humanism

A

With counterculture, humanism came to include all sorts of different approaches, perhaps too many.

Emphasis on:

  • hedonism (“if it feels good, do it”),
  • anti-intellectualism (any cognitive approach = “mind-fucking”),
  • individual fulfillment (“doing your own thing”, “peak experiences”),
  • self-actualization (a belief in human perfectibility).

These soon led to a divorce between humanistic psychology and the academic community.

29
Q

HUMANISTIC PSYCHOANALYSTS: FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY

A

Otto Rank, Karen Horney, Erich Fromm, Helmuth Kaiser closely parallel some of the work. All objected to Freud’s instinct-powered model and made contributions of their own.

  • Rank: emphasised the importance of will and of death anxiety
  • Horney: emphasised the crucial role of the future (ideals, purpose, goals motivate rather than past events) as an influencer of behavior
  • Fromm: illuminated the role and fear of freedom in behavior
  • Kaiser: responsibility and isolation

Dostoyevsky, Kafka, Tolstoy, Sartre, Camus are also incredibly important.

30
Q

Quarantined by the academic establishment

A

The reason is “How do we know what we know?” - academic psychiatry and psychology are grounded in a positivist tradition, value empirical research as the method of validating knowledge.

31
Q

Problem with Empiricism

A

Problem: the empirical method requires that the investigator study a complex organism by breaking it down into parts simple enough for empirical investigation.

Frankl story: “His cat ate ten pounds of my butter.” → Wise man put the cat on the scale - exactly 10 pounds. Wise man: “Well, here’s the butter, but where’s the cat?” → Human is greater than the sum of its parts.

32
Q

Rollo May on Western thought

A

But it goes further than “where’s the cat?”. Rollo May: “existentialism is the endeavor to understand man by cutting below the cleavage between subject and object which has bedeviled Western thought and science since shortly after the Renaissance.”

PS!: Empirical limitations exist everywhere, it’s just that they are more explicit in existential. Insofar as therapy is deeply personal, there will be errors and limited value. Many great clinicians put down their tables of random numbers once they’ve reached their academic achievements.

33
Q

Cartesian vs Existential (incl Heidegger)

A

Cartesian: world is full of objects and of subjects who perceive them. Thus, objects with a finite set of properties that can be understood through objective investigation.

Existential: person not just a subject who can perceive reality under certain circumstances, but as a consciousness who participates in the construction of reality.

Heidegger referred to human as dasein: at once the meaning giver and the known

34
Q

Yalom’s personal story on measurement

A
Personal story: measured 
1) participants perspective 
2) group leader’s perspective, 
3) participant’s co-members 
4) participant’s social network
 → correlation between all of these was zero. 

The more methods used to assess outcome, the less certain is the researcher of his results! Ways to deal with this:

  • Less sources = more reliability
  • Only quantitative sources (how much alcohol, number of interruptions, number of bites of food etc.)

But try to measure ability to love and care, humor, courage, engagement, spontaneity etc.! Strange science.

35
Q

“Phenomenological” alternative

A

To go directly into the phenomena themselves, to encounter the other without “standardized” instruments and presuppositions. However, this is of course problematic for the research who struggles to achieve high scientific standards.

There’s a story of a man who searched at night for a lost key not in the whole dark alley where he dropped it but under a lamppost because the light was better.

The book intends to offer a paradigm that offers the clinician a system of explanation.