C. Wright Mills Flashcards
Individual problem
a problem caused by individual characteristics/choices/actions
Social problem
a problem that individuals suffer but that is promoted by the social environment
The problem with social problems
combination of social problems with individualism
promotes considerable angst
we blame the problems on ourselves or deleted them to blame others
Sociological imagination
ability to connect seemingly impersonal and remote historical/social forces to the incidents of an individuals life
Components of the sociological imagination(3)
1) History: how society came to be, major historical forces created it
2) social structures: how the various institutional orders in a society operate, which ones are dominate and how they function
3) Biography: particular individual characteristics
Example: Missing aboriginal women
Individual: sees women as defective in some way, made bad choices with dire consequences
But the sociological imagination:
History: cultural genocide and margnilization disempowering of aboriginal women and crate of a negative discourse (Stevenson)
Social structure: high likelihood of experiencing poverty and discrimination, living in isolated areas with high crime and limited services
biography: shaped by history and social structure
Structure- Agency Debate
social imagination focuses on structure but Mills also thought people have agency
believes one’s agency depends on history, social structure and biography
The Power Elite
concerned with the bases of power/agency inequality in the US in the 1950s
saw organizations as the key to disempowerment
Michels vs. Mills
Michels: empowered a select few, which allowed them to dominate organizations and their members
unlike Michels, Mills focused on larger society, not single organizations
Mills and Society
societies are increasingly dominated by organizations
organizational elites dominate society
Mills and organization and social power
believed that the most powerful organizations in the us in the 1950s exerted great control over individual life
1) corporate chieftains: CEOs of major corporations
2) political directorate: officials who command the state hierarchies
3) warlords: military generals
Interlocking Directorate (3)
3 components of the power elite are intertwined but not autonomous
1) Status community: go to the same schools, have same friendship networks, have same elite outlooks
2) Interdependence: all 3 segments of the elite are interdependent
3)Transferability: elites from one segment can become elites from another segment
Outcome of interlocking directorate
cohesive elite community and are able to look out for elite interest
promotes social and political oligarchy
limits the agency of the masses and deters democracy