BRM2016Q6 Flashcards
What are typical mistakes in setting research questions and objectives?
- Having too broad questions that you will have to work a lifetime to answer
- Aims as “to investigate” and “to study” are not aims in themselves and need to be avoided
What is mode 1 and 2 research?
- Mode 1: focusing on theoretical questions and problems ⇒ Theoretical and academics
- Mode 2: direct engagement with social practice and problems ⇒ Practical and typically management research
- Mode 1.5: a compromise of mode 1 and 2 ⇒ business students (can also use mode 2 but is typically this compromised mode 1.5 approach).
What is action research?
An approach to research that seeks understanding through attempting to change the situation under investigation
Characteristics of Action research on page 173-174
What is applied research?
Studies that focus on tackling practical problems in organizations where the desired outcome will be knowledge about how to solve the problem
What is content analysis?
A relatively deductive method of analysis where codes (or con¬structs) are almost all predetermined and where they are systematically searched for within the data collected
What is engaged research?
Involves close collaboration between academics and practitioners in determining the research aims, its implementation, and the practical implications
What is epistemology?
Views about the most appropriate ways of enquiring into the nature of the world.
What can we know about reality? What is knowledge? How does knowledge differ from beliefs, opinions and superstition?
What is evaluation research?
is research which has, as its focus, the systemic and rigorous assessment of an activity or object such that the information and insights gleaned can provide useful feedback
What is grounded analysis?
The linking of key variables (theoretical codes) into a more holistic theory that makes a contribution to knowledge in a particular field or domain
What is methods and techniques?
The instruments and processes for gathering research data, analyzing it and drawing conclusions from it.
What is mode 1 research?
The generation of theoretical knowledge through detached scientific research
What is mode 1½ research?
The generation of useful knowledge through combining scientific research methods with practical engagement
What is mode 2 research?
The generation of practical knowledge through direct engagement with practice
What is ontology?
Views about the nature of reality.
What does it mean to say that something exists? That god exists vs. that the color green exists
What is participant observation?
A form of ethnography where there is close involvement in the organization in order to gain a detailed understanding of other people’s realities
Primary data new information that is collected directly by the researcher
What is pure research?
Research for which the primary objective/output is the development of theory
What is qualitative data?
The authors of this book see the logic or framing that defines the research questions of social scientists as little different whether structural equation models are used or methods of discourse analysis. Qualitative data requires relevance to be identified, categories and concepts to be defined and theories developed, as well as the development of particular truths. In addition, data is usually (but not always) gathered through the engagement of the researcher
What is reflexivity?
Where researchers think about the effects they have had or may have on the outcome and process of research
What is secondary data?
research information that already exists in the form of publications or other electronic media, which is collected by the researcher
What is a literature review and its purpose?
An analytical summary of an existing body of research.
- helps researcher to learn from previous research
- to provide a context and help it to refine its topic
- to highlight flaws in previous research and outline gaps in the knowledge
- indicate what the research adds to the field
- justifying why research is undertaken
- ensure that the research has undertaken fits within the subject area
What are sources of information?
Listed by acknowledgment, with most acknowledged first:
- peer-reviewed journal articles
- academic books
- reference works
- working papers and theses
- academic websites, research blogs and podcasts
“Grey” literature
- governmental publications and websites
- websites, email lists, newsletters and online forums run på expert groups
- the internet
What are the criterias for evaluation sources of information?
table 2.1 for more information
- Purpose
- Authorship
- Credibility and accuracy
- Timeliness
What are the two types of literature review?
- traditional literature review:
- systematic literature review: very strict in the use of literature; more or less ONLY academic journal articles
What are the pros and cons of systematic literature review?
table 2.2
What are the pros and cons of different sources?
table x.x
What are some leading questions to start your literature review?
- what is the topic of my research?
- why is this topic relevant, important or interesting?
- how does this project relate to past research in this field?
- what are the main concepts and theories that would be relevant?
- what is the aim of the literature review, and how does it relate to the aim of my research?
- what could be an appropriate working title for this review?
What are different kinds of reviews?
- critical review: assess value of existing research in critical light
- theoretical review: evaluates and synthesizes a corpus of theory that has accumulated around a concept, theory, or phenomenon
- scoping review: maps the territory for future research and develops a new research agenda
How is a literature review structured?
- Introduction: topic, aim, and the scope of the review, why topic is of interest, organization of review
- Main body: methodological and conceptual issues, sub-topics or themes, ended by a discussion leading to the identification of key findings
- Conclusion: summary of review. Flaws and gaps in literature are identified which motivate and justify future research.
What are the main viewpoints of the philosophical debate?
- Deriving theories from data vs. deriving theory and afterwards looking at data
What is ontology, epistemology, methodology and methods and techniques?
What are the main viewpoints of the philosophical debate on ontology?
Fx: Corporate profit
- Realist: interested in a single figure that represents the difference between income and expenditure
- Internal realist: will see a more complex position; what acquisitions and divestments have been taking place
- Relativist: profit is just one of many indicators of corporate health (sales growth, innovation, stock-market valuations etc. also important).
- Nominalist: how has the profit figures been constructed? are the management trying to hide or show particular things, have they tried to minimize tax liabilities to maximize their annual bonus payments etc.?
What has been the trend since the 1980s in management research?
A gradual trend towards social constructionism from positivism.
More mixed approaches of relatively weak positivism and relatively weak social constructionism in being used.
What are the differences between social constructionism and positivism?
What are some of the methodological implications of different epistemologies? (strong positivism, positivism, constructionism, strong constructionism)
In regards to epistemology and research we have a dimension of positivism vs. constructivism, what is the other dimension?
How engaged vs. detached the researchers is.
Some argue that a researcher should strive to be independent and DETACHED from the people and processes that they are studying, whereas others argue that when studying social systems like complex organizations, there is positive value in getting closer to the things they are studying, and this is increasingly known as an ENGAGED style of research.
(page 58-63)
Quadrant A: Detached positivism; critical realism
Quadrant B: Detached constructionism; hermeneutics, postmodernism,
Quadrant C: Engaged constructivism; pragmatism, critical theory,
Quadrant D: Engaged positivism;
What is the experimenter effect?
The concept that human behavior can be affected and potentially “distorted” by the presence of an observer.
What are the four different types of quasi-experimental designs? (p. 70-73)
- Cross-sectional comparison:
- post-test only design. Comparing two groups (proportions or means). This is not very strong as we would often be tempted to conclude causality on a variable on the difference seen between the two groups. However, we have to check for lurking and confounding variables, which is not necessarily possible
- Longitudinal design
- Before/After test of 1 group where “after” is taking our intervention into account (fx. giving a certain drug)
- Problem is history effects (some other event has influenced the group) + maturation (getting smarter, healthier etc. during the period anyway) + testing effect (people might answer differently when asked the second time simply due to higher awareness)
- Before/After test of 1 group where “after” is taking our intervention into account (fx. giving a certain drug)
- Randomized control group
- Comparing two groups that have been randomized. We compare before/after where one randomized group has been influenced by our intervention during the study and one has not been influenced by our intervention. Is there any different?
- This makes sure that the risks of history effect and maturation effect are removed
- Comparing two groups that have been randomized. We compare before/after where one randomized group has been influenced by our intervention during the study and one has not been influenced by our intervention. Is there any different?
- Nonequivalent control group
- Before/After test of two groups. However, the two groups are not randomized but created on some other criterion.
What is internal and external validity?
How can you generalize your results? If it is true in all situations (external), or if it only true within your organization (internal).
E.g. Newton’s law of motion applies for the rest of the world, not only one country.
In a trade-off of designing a sample, which is better?: Imprecisely right or precisely right?
Imprecisely right (low bias, but low precision)
What are different ways of sampling data? (probability sampling)
- Simple random sampling
- Stratified random sampling
- Systematic random sampling
- Cluster sampling
- Multi-stage sampling (combines the use of the other methods to achieve higher operational and technical efficiency).
What are different ways of sampling data? (NON-probability sampling) (p. 82)
- Convenience sampling
- Quota sampling
- Purposive sampling
- Snowball sampling
What does archival research refer to?
Textual information and the analysis thereof.
What is action research?
- The best way of learning about an organization or social system is through attempting to change it, and this, therefore, should be an objective of the action researcher
- The people most likely to be affected by, or involved in implementing, these changes should as far as possible become involved in the research process itself.
What is co-operative inquiry?
A term used for action research where the researcher’s involvement in the process is taken a stage further.
What is the principle of ethnography when used in research? (constructionism)
That the researcher should “immerse” him or herself in a setting, and become part of the group under study in order to understand the meanings and significances that people give to their behavior and that of other ⇒ Strong form of constructionism.
What is the difference between emic and etic perspectives?
- Emic: sounds within a language which can only be distinguished by speaker of that language: fx. four tones in Mandarin
- Etic: American english sounding monotonic from the viewpoint of French and Italian speakers (they can hear that it is monotonous, whereas Americans often are unaware)
What characterizes the case method?
Originally from dominant positivist texts but can be constructed and used as a more mixed method.
The case study looks into depth at one, or a small number of, organizations, events, or individuals, generally over time.
Social constructionism epistemology often advocates for single cases
Positivist epistemology often advocates for multiple cases.
What characterizes grounded theory? (p. 92-94)
“Comparative method” ⇒ looking at the same event/process in different settings or situations.
What are the primary choices when designing mixed research methods?
- Sequence of methods: qualitative first, quantitative first or both at the same time?
- Dominance of methods: dominantly qualitative, or quantitative or balanced?
- How do we analyze the mix of numerical and categorical data?
See arguments for and against mixed methods at p. 97.