Book: Ch. 3. Quiz / Key terms / Essays Flashcards
Understand federalism (pp. 80–86)
Along with many other countries, the American system
of government has divided power between national and regional or state governments. That division of power has varied over time, and America’s notion of federalism has evolved through a number of forms.
federalism (p. 80)
a system of government in which power is divided between a central government and regional governments
sovereign (p. 82)
possessing supreme political authority within a geographic area
- Federalism refers to
a) a system of government where cities are strong.
b) a system of government where executive power is
grounded in a committee of governors.
c) a system of government where there is a national
government as well as a number of regional govern-
ments.
d) a system of government dominated by business
interests.
e) a system of government with strong parliaments.
c) a system of government where there is a national
government as well as a number of regional govern-
ments.
- The Articles of Confederation
a) was a loose confederation of independent states
that operated in the 1820s.
b) was never accepted by a majority of the states.
c) derived its power directly from the state
governments.
d) replaced the U.S. Constitution of 1787.
e) outlawed effective state constitutions.
c) derived its power directly from the state
governments.
- The relationship between the states and the national government
a) has been a matter of continuing controversy throughout the nation’s history.
b) was finally settled when the Articles of Confederation were rejected in favor of the U.S. Constitution.
c) was resolved for all time by the Civil War.
d) was resolved by Article I, Section 8, of the U.S.
Constitution.
e) was not a problem in a federal system.
a) has been a matter of continuing controversy throughout the nation’s history.
- The Supreme Court under John Marshall expanded national power partly through
a) rejecting the Articles of Confederation.
b) expanding the meaning of interstate commerce.
c) expanding Congress’s war-making powers.
d) ignoring the Tenth Amendment.
e) increasing the powers of the president.
b) expanding the meaning of interstate commerce.
- Prior to the ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Bill of Rights
a) applied only to states.
b) applied only to the national government.
c) applied to states and the national government.
d) was essential in protecting individual rights.
e) was applied only in extreme cases of rights
violations.
b) applied only to the national government.
- McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) was important
a) in establishing that the national government had
implied powers.
b) in establishing that state governments had implied
powers.
c) in showing that the state and national governments
could cooperate.
d) in preventing national banks from operating.
e) in destroying corrupt state banking systems.
a) in establishing that the national government had
implied powers.
categorical grants (p. 87)
congressionally appropriated grants to states and localities on the condition that expenditures be limited to a problem or group specified by law
New Federalism (p. 90)
the attempts by Presidents Nixon and Reagan to return power to the states through block grants
block grants (p. 90)
federal grants that allow states considerable discretion on how funds are spent
Describe the sources of national and state power as they relate to federalism today (pp. 90–100)
The incorporation of much of the Bill of Rights has limited the power of state governments by making them subject to restrictions under the U.S. Constitution. Additionally, the preemption doctrine has allowed the national government to prohibit state legislation in certain fields. An important constitutional provision that limits state action is the Fourteenth Amendment, particularly the equal protection clause of that amendment which prohibits discriminatory actions by state governments. Until recently, a number of jurisdictions—including Texas—were limited by the 1965 Voting Rights Act in the legislation they could pass involving the electoral process, although a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision has made it possible for Texas to pass controversial voter identification legislation. Finally, while state governments cannot reduce the rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, they can expand those guarantees under the concept of independent state grounds.
coercive federalism (p. 90)
federal policies that force states to change their policies to achieve national goals
unfunded mandates (p. 90)
federal requirements that states or local governments pay the costs of federal policies